Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by ROBERT VOLK and LISA MARIE LOWENSTEIN.
Connection Strength
7.513
-
A protocol for a cluster randomized trial of care delivery models to improve the quality of smoking cessation and shared decision making for lung cancer screening. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 05; 128:107141.
Score: 0.925
-
Smoking cessation services and shared decision-making practices among lung cancer screening facilities: A cross-sectional study. Cancer. 2022 05 15; 128(10):1967-1975.
Score: 0.860
-
Implementing Decision Coaching for Lung Cancer Screening in the Low-Dose Computed Tomography Setting. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 08; 16(8):e703-e725.
Score: 0.754
-
Randomized trial of a patient-centered decision aid for promoting informed decisions about lung cancer screening: Implementation of a PCORI study protocol and lessons learned. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 09; 72:26-34.
Score: 0.671
-
Shared decision-making conversations and smoking cessation interventions: critical components of low-dose CT lung cancer screening programs. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018 Jun; 7(3):254-271.
Score: 0.665
-
A brief measure of Smokers' knowledge of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography. Prev Med Rep. 2016 Dec; 4:351-6.
Score: 0.585
-
Impact of the shared decision-making process on lung cancer screening decisions. Cancer Med. 2022 02; 11(3):790-797.
Score: 0.213
-
Factors Associated With Obtaining Lung Cancer Screening Among Persons Who Smoke. MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jul-Dec; 6(2):23814683211067810.
Score: 0.213
-
Factors that influence clinicians' decisions to decrease active surveillance monitoring frequency or transition to watchful waiting for localised prostate cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2021 11 12; 11(11):e048347.
Score: 0.211
-
Shared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening: How Well Are We "Sharing"? Chest. 2021 07; 160(1):330-340.
Score: 0.200
-
Implementation of Shared Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening Among the Privately Insured Nonelderly. MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jan-Jun; 6(1):2381468320984773.
Score: 0.200
-
Smoking cessation and shared decision-making practices about lung cancer screening among primary care providers. Cancer Med. 2021 02; 10(4):1357-1365.
Score: 0.200
-
Patient Adherence to Screening for Lung Cancer in the US: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 11 02; 3(11):e2025102.
Score: 0.197
-
Effect of a Patient Decision Aid on Lung Cancer Screening Decision-Making by Persons Who Smoke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 01 03; 3(1):e1920362.
Score: 0.186
-
A Review of the Presentation of Overdiagnosis in Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aids. MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Jul-Dec; 4(2):2381468319881447.
Score: 0.184
-
Patients' information needs and attitudes about post-treatment surveillance for colorectal cancer in the United States: a multi-perspective, mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2019 08 15; 9(8):e025888.
Score: 0.181
-
Responsiveness of a Brief Measure of Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge. J Cancer Educ. 2018 08; 33(4):842-846.
Score: 0.168
-
Communication about geriatric assessment domains in advanced cancer settings: "Missed opportunities". J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 01; 10(1):68-73.
Score: 0.166
-
Using a Patient Decision Aid Video to Assess Current and Former Smokers' Values About the Harms and Benefits of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography. MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Jan-Jun; 3(1):2381468318769886.
Score: 0.165
-
Limitations of the S-TOFHLA in measuring poor numeracy: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2018 03 27; 18(1):405.
Score: 0.164
-
An entertainment-education colorectal cancer screening decision aid for African American patients: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2017 Apr 15; 123(8):1401-1408.
Score: 0.150
-
Implementing a Telehealth Shared Counseling and Decision-Making Visit for Lung Cancer Screening in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Fed Pract. 2023 Aug; 40(Suppl 3):S83-S90.
Score: 0.060
-
Patients' Preferences for Androgen Deprivation Therapy in the Treatment of Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer. MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Jul-Dec; 7(2):23814683221137752.
Score: 0.057
-
Short-form adaptive measure of financial toxicity from the Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh) study: Derivation using modern psychometric techniques. PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0272804.
Score: 0.056
-
Predicting Risk of Recurrence After Colorectal Cancer Surgery in the United States: An Analysis of a Special Commission on Cancer National Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug; 27(8):2740-2749.
Score: 0.047
-
Engaging patients in the uptake, understanding, and use of evidence: Addressing barriers and facilitators of successful engagement. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 01; 100(1):4.
Score: 0.036