Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by PATRICK BRYAN GARVEY and MARK WARREN CLEMENS.
Connection Strength
1.749
-
Obesity and Breast Reconstruction: Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 03; 145(3):481e-490e.
Score: 0.185
-
Reconstruction of massive chest wall defects: A 20-year experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Jun; 73(6):1091-1098.
Score: 0.185
-
Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Tissue Expander/Implant Reconstruction: 2-Year Risks and Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Prospective, Multicenter Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov; 140(5):869-877.
Score: 0.158
-
U.S. Epidemiology of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May; 139(5):1042-1050.
Score: 0.152
-
Reply: To PMID 24083910. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May; 218(5):1081-3.
Score: 0.124
-
Abstract 7: Bioprosthetic versus Synthetic Mesh for Reconstruction of Oncologic Chest Wall Defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar; 133(3 Suppl):14-15.
Score: 0.122
-
Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Feb; 133(2):223-233.
Score: 0.122
-
Bovine versus porcine acellular dermal matrix for complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan; 131(1):71-79.
Score: 0.113
-
Vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flow-through flap to a free fibula flap for total sacrectomy reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2013 Jan; 33(1):32-8.
Score: 0.107
-
Long-term Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes Comparing Skin-Preserving, Staged Versus Delayed Microvascular Breast Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep; 30(9):5711-5722.
Score: 0.058
-
Ensuring Safety While Achieving Beauty: An Evidence-Based Approach to Optimizing Mastectomy and Autologous Breast Reconstruction Outcomes in Patients with Obesity. J Am Coll Surg. 2023 09 01; 237(3):441-451.
Score: 0.058
-
Oncologic Safety and Surveillance of Autologous Fat Grafting following Breast Conservation Therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 08; 146(2):215-225.
Score: 0.048
-
Synthetic Mesh Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix for Oncologic Chest Wall Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug; 27(8):3009-3017.
Score: 0.046
-
Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction with Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 02 15; 39(3):279-288.
Score: 0.043
-
A 10-Year Experience with Mastectomy and Tissue Expander Placement to Facilitate Subsequent Radiation and Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct; 24(10):2965-2971.
Score: 0.039
-
Operative and Oncologic Outcomes in 9861 Patients with Operable Breast Cancer: Single-Institution Analysis of Breast Conservation with Oncoplastic Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 10; 23(10):3190-8.
Score: 0.036
-
Salvaging the Infected Breast Tissue Expander: A Standardized Multidisciplinary Approach. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jun; 4(6):e732.
Score: 0.036
-
Critical Evaluation of Risk Factors and Early Complications in 564 Consecutive Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions Using Acellular Dermal Matrix at a Single Center. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul; 136(1):10-20.
Score: 0.034
-
Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec; 217(6):999-1009.
Score: 0.030
-
A prospective study of transit-time flow volume measurement for intraoperative evaluation and optimization of free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Feb; 131(2):270-281.
Score: 0.028
-
Cephalometric analysis for microvascular head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck. 2012 Nov; 34(11):1607-14.
Score: 0.026