Connection

TAMARA MINER HAYGOOD to Mammography

This is a "connection" page, showing publications TAMARA MINER HAYGOOD has written about Mammography.
Connection Strength

1.748
  1. Detection of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct; 197(4):W761-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.252
  2. Conspicuity of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. Acad Radiol. 2009 Dec; 16(12):1509-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.222
  3. Why does it take longer to read digital than film-screen screening mammograms? A partial explanation. J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr; 23(2):170-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.210
  4. Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jan; 192(1):216-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  5. Results of a survey on digital screening mammography: prevalence, efficiency, and use of ancillary diagnostic AIDS. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Apr; 5(4):585-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.198
  6. Model observer for assessing digital breast tomosynthesis for multi-lesion detection in the presence of anatomical noise. Phys Med Biol. 2018 02 16; 63(4):045017.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  7. A half-second glimpse often lets radiologists identify breast cancer cases even when viewing the mammogram of the opposite breast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 09 13; 113(37):10292-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  8. Radiologist experience effects on contrast detection. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2014 Nov 01; 31(11):2328-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  9. Trend of contrast detection threshold with and without localization. J Digit Imaging. 2013 Dec; 26(6):1099-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  10. Verification of DICOM GSDF in complex backgrounds. J Digit Imaging. 2012 Oct; 25(5):662-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  11. Challenges in mammography: part 1, artifacts in digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec; 197(6):W1023-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  12. Interpretation time of computer-aided detection at screening mammography. Radiology. 2010 Oct; 257(1):40-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  13. Snakules: a model-based active contour algorithm for the annotation of spicules on mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Oct; 29(10):1768-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  14. Evaluation of stylus for radiographic image annotation. J Digit Imaging. 2010 Dec; 23(6):701-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  15. Stereoscopic interpretation of low-dose breast tomosynthesis projection images. J Digit Imaging. 2014 Apr; 27(2):248-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.