Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by GUILLERMO GARCIA-MANERO and JOSEPH KHOURY.
Connection Strength

3.985
  1. Clinicopathologic correlates and natural history of atypical chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2021 09 01; 127(17):3113-3124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  2. Evolutionary action score identifies a subset of TP53 mutated myelodysplastic syndrome with favorable prognosis. Blood Cancer J. 2021 03 06; 11(3):52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  3. Clinical outcomes and influence of mutation clonal dominance in oligomonocytic and classical chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2021 02 01; 96(2):E50-E53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  4. KDM6B overexpression activates innate immune signaling and impairs hematopoiesis in mice. Blood Adv. 2018 10 09; 2(19):2491-2504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  5. Validation of the 2017 revision of the WHO chronic myelomonocytic leukemia categories. Blood Adv. 2018 08 14; 2(15):1807-1816.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  6. Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia With Fibrosis Is a Distinct Disease Subset With Myeloproliferative Features and Frequent JAK2 p.V617F Mutations. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 06; 42(6):799-806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  7. Bone marrow pathologic abnormalities in familial platelet disorder with propensity for myeloid malignancy and germline RUNX1 mutation. Haematologica. 2017 10; 102(10):1661-1670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  8. Phase 2 study of low-dose clofarabine plus cytarabine for patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome who have relapsed or are refractory to hypomethylating agents. Cancer. 2017 Feb 15; 123(4):629-637.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  9. TP53 overexpression is an independent adverse prognostic factor in de novo myelodysplastic syndromes with fibrosis. Br J Haematol. 2015 Oct; 171(1):91-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  10. Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(v;5q33) Is Associated With Poor Overall Survival and Often Lacks Myelodysplastic Features. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015 Jun; 15 Suppl:S85-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  11. Discovery of imatinib-responsive FIP1L1-PDGFRA mutation during refractory acute myeloid leukemia transformation of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2014 Mar 27; 7:26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  12. BRAF kinase domain mutations are present in a subset of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with wild-type RAS. Am J Hematol. 2014 May; 89(5):499-504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  13. Genomic determinants of response and resistance to inotuzumab ozogamicin in B-cell ALL. Blood. 2024 Mar 29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  14. Myeloid neoplasm with <10% blasts and t(3;5)(q25.1;q34)/NPM::MLF1: A classification dilemma. Am J Hematol. 2024 Mar 05.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  15. Genomic determinants of response and resistance to inotuzumab ozogamicin in B-cell ALL. medRxiv. 2023 Dec 09.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  16. Phase I Results of Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal Inhibitor PLX51107 in Combination with Azacitidine in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Myeloid Malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 11 01; 29(21):4352-4360.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  17. A Phase I study of Milademetan (DS3032b) in combination with low dose cytarabine with or without venetoclax in acute myeloid leukemia: Clinical safety, efficacy, and correlative analysis. Blood Cancer J. 2023 06 29; 13(1):101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  18. Mini-hyper-CVD plus inotuzumab ozogamicin, with or without blinatumomab, in the subgroup of older patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia: long-term results of an open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2023 Jun; 10(6):e433-e444.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  19. Clinicopathologic Features of Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasms in Patients with Myeloma in the Era of Novel Therapies. Mod Pathol. 2023 06; 36(6):100166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  20. Ponatinib and blinatumomab for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a US, single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2022 Nov 16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  21. High-sensitivity next-generation sequencing MRD assessment in ALL identifies patients at very low risk of relapse. Blood Adv. 2022 07 12; 6(13):4006-4014.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  22. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm treated with frontline HCVAD. Blood Adv. 2022 05 24; 6(10):3027-3035.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  23. Immunohistochemical loss of enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2) protein expression correlates with EZH2 alterations and portends a worse outcome in myelodysplastic syndromes. Mod Pathol. 2022 09; 35(9):1212-1219.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  24. Prediction of survival with intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2022 07; 97(7):865-876.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  25. Improved outcomes among newly diagnosed patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication mutated acute myeloid leukemia treated with contemporary therapy: Revisiting the European LeukemiaNet adverse risk classification. Am J Hematol. 2022 03 01; 97(3):329-337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  26. Outcomes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with KMT2A (MLL) rearrangement: the MD Anderson experience. Blood Adv. 2021 12 14; 5(23):5415-5419.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  27. Central nervous system involvement in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. Blood. 2021 10 14; 138(15):1373-1377.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  28. Hyper-CVAD plus ofatumumab versus hyper-CVAD plus rituximab as frontline therapy in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A propensity score analysis. Cancer. 2021 09 15; 127(18):3381-3389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  29. Incidental identification of inv(16)(p13.1q22)/CBFB-MYH11 variant transcript in a patient with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia by routine leukemia translocation panel screen: implications for diagnosis and therapy. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2021 06; 7(3).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  30. Prognostic factors for progression in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in complete molecular response within 3 months of therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer. 2021 08 01; 127(15):2648-2656.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  31. Long-term follow-up of salvage therapy using a combination of inotuzumab ozogamicin and mini-hyper-CVD with or without blinatumomab in relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2021 06 15; 127(12):2025-2038.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  32. Outcome of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: Focus on near-ETP phenotype and differential impact of nelarabine. Am J Hematol. 2021 05 01; 96(5):589-598.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  33. Next-Generation Sequencing of DDX41 in Myeloid Neoplasms Leads to Increased Detection of Germline Alterations. Front Oncol. 2020; 10:582213.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  34. Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia With Concurrent Core Binding Factor Rearrangement and Philadelphia Chromosome. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 05; 21(5):338-344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  35. Translocation t(1;19)(q23;p13) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia - a distinct subtype with favorable prognosis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2021 01; 62(1):224-228.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  36. Germline DNMT3A mutation in familial acute myeloid leukaemia. Epigenetics. 2021 05; 16(5):567-576.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  37. Hyper-CVAD regimen in combination with ofatumumab as frontline therapy for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2020 Jul; 7(7):e523-e533.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  38. Phase 2 study of hyper-CMAD with liposomal vincristine for patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2020 07; 95(7):734-739.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  39. Clinico-pathologic characteristics and outcomes of the World Health Organization (WHO) provisional entity de novo acute myeloid leukemia with mutated RUNX1. Mod Pathol. 2020 09; 33(9):1678-1689.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  40. Outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia related changes depend on diagnostic criteria and therapy. Am J Hematol. 2020 06; 95(6):612-622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  41. The early achievement of measurable residual disease negativity in the treatment of adults with Philadelphia-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia is a strong predictor for survival. Am J Hematol. 2020 02; 95(2):144-150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  42. DDX41 mutations in myeloid neoplasms are associated with male gender, TP53 mutations and high-risk disease. Am J Hematol. 2019 07; 94(7):757-766.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  43. A phase 2 clinical trial of eltrombopag for treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes after hypomethylating-agent failure. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 09; 60(9):2207-2213.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  44. Combination of hyper-CVAD with ponatinib as first-line therapy for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: long-term follow-up of a single-centre, phase 2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Dec; 5(12):e618-e627.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  45. Chemoimmunotherapy with inotuzumab ozogamicin combined with mini-hyper-CVD, with or without blinatumomab, is highly effective in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first salvage. Cancer. 2018 10 15; 124(20):4044-4055.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  46. Inotuzumab ozogamicin in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy for older patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 02; 19(2):240-248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  47. Outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia after blinatumomab failure: No change in the level of CD19 expression. Am J Hematol. 2018 03; 93(3):371-374.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  48. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia masquerading as cutaneous indeterminate dendritic cell tumor: Expanding the spectrum of skin lesions in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. J Cutan Pathol. 2017 Dec; 44(12):1075-1079.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  49. TP53 mutation does not confer a poor outcome in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who are treated with frontline hyper-CVAD-based regimens. Cancer. 2017 Oct 01; 123(19):3717-3724.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  50. Outcomes of adults with relapsed or refractory Burkitt and high-grade B-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Am J Hematol. 2017 06; 92(6):E114-E117.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  51. Differential impact of minimal residual disease negativity according to the salvage status in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2017 01 01; 123(2):294-302.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  52. Prognostic significance of day 14 bone marrow evaluation in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2016 Dec 15; 122(24):3812-3820.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  53. Combination of hyper-CVAD with ponatinib as first-line therapy for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a single-centre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Nov; 16(15):1547-1555.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  54. Cytogenetic risk stratification of 417 patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia from a single institution. Am J Hematol. 2014 Aug; 89(8):813-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.