Connection

JAMES C YAO to Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

This is a "connection" page, showing publications JAMES C YAO has written about Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic.
  1. Targeted therapies in neuroendocrine tumors (NET): clinical trial challenges and lessons learned. Oncologist. 2013; 18(5):525-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.240
  2. In reply. Oncologist. 2013; 18(11):1240-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.235
  3. Relationship between metabolic toxicity and efficacy of everolimus in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: A pooled analysis from the randomized, phase 3 RADIANT-3 and RADIANT-4 trials. Cancer. 2021 Aug 01; 127(15):2674-2682.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  4. Discrepancies in endpoints between clinical trial protocols and clinical trial registration in randomized trials in oncology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 12 12; 18(1):169.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  5. From Protocols to Publications: A Study in Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials in Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 01; 33(31):3583-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  6. Future directions in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: consensus report of the National Cancer Institute Neuroendocrine Tumor clinical trials planning meeting. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 01; 29(7):934-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  7. Perspectives in the development of novel treatment approaches. Tumori. 2010 Sep-Oct; 96(5):858-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  8. Therapy of localized gastric cancer: preoperative and postoperative approaches. Ann Oncol. 2002; 13 Suppl 4:7-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  9. FRESCO-2: a global Phase III study investigating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in metastatic colorectal cancer. Future Oncol. 2021 Aug; 17(24):3151-3162.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  10. Markers of Systemic Inflammation in Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Pooled Analysis of the RADIANT-3 and RADIANT-4 Studies. Pancreas. 2021 02 01; 50(2):130-137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.