Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by DAVID S FOLLOWILL and STEPHEN F KRY.
Connection Strength
12.027
-
Independent recalculation outperforms traditional measurement-based IMRT QA methods in detecting unacceptable plans. Med Phys. 2019 Aug; 46(8):3700-3708.
Score: 0.687
-
Radiation Therapy Deficiencies Identified During On-Site Dosimetry Visits by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston Quality Assurance Center. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 12 01; 99(5):1094-1100.
Score: 0.605
-
Institutional patient-specific IMRT QA does not predict unacceptable plan delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Dec 01; 90(5):1195-201.
Score: 0.497
-
Response to Thomsen et al.: Comments on "The Radiological Physics Center's standard dataset for small field size output factors". J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Mar 06; 15(2):4841.
Score: 0.476
-
Algorithms used in heterogeneous dose calculations show systematic differences as measured with the Radiological Physics Center's anthropomorphic thorax phantom used for RTOG credentialing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jan 01; 85(1):e95-100.
Score: 0.438
-
Ion recombination correction factors (P(ion)) for Varian TrueBeam high-dose-rate therapy beams. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 Nov 08; 13(6):3803.
Score: 0.434
-
Neutron spectra and dose equivalents calculated in tissue for high-energy radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2009 Apr; 36(4):1244-50.
Score: 0.338
-
Monte Carlo study shows no significant difference in second cancer risk between 6- and 18-MV intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2009 Apr; 91(1):132-7.
Score: 0.333
-
The Value of On-Site Proton Audits. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 03 15; 112(4):1004-1011.
Score: 0.203
-
Photon beam modeling variations predict errors in IMRT dosimetry audits. Radiother Oncol. 2022 01; 166:8-14.
Score: 0.202
-
Report dose-to-medium in clinical trials where available; a consensus from the Global Harmonisation Group to maximize consistency. Radiother Oncol. 2021 06; 159:106-111.
Score: 0.194
-
Evaluation of image quality of a novel computed tomography metal artifact management technique on an anthropomorphic head and neck phantom. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jan; 17:111-116.
Score: 0.193
-
Dosimetric impact of commercial CT metal artifact reduction algorithms and a novel in-house algorithm for proton therapy of head and neck cancer. Med Phys. 2021 Jan; 48(1):445-455.
Score: 0.190
-
Sensitivity of IROC phantom performance to radiotherapy treatment planning system beam modeling parameters based on community-driven data. Med Phys. 2020 Oct; 47(10):5250-5259.
Score: 0.186
-
Development of a stereoscopic CT metal artifact management algorithm using gantry angle tilts for head and neck patients. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Aug; 21(8):120-130.
Score: 0.183
-
Differences in the Patterns of Failure Between IROC Lung and Spine Phantom Irradiations. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020 Sep - Oct; 10(5):372-381.
Score: 0.183
-
Survey results of 3D-CRT and IMRT quality assurance practice. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jul; 21(7):70-76.
Score: 0.182
-
Reference dataset of users' photon beam modeling parameters for the Eclipse, Pinnacle, and RayStation treatment planning systems. Med Phys. 2020 Jan; 47(1):282-288.
Score: 0.176
-
Calibration strategies for use of the nanoDot OSLD in CT applications. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jan; 20(1):331-339.
Score: 0.165
-
Treatment plan complexity does not predict IROC Houston anthropomorphic head and neck phantom performance. Phys Med Biol. 2018 10 17; 63(20):205015.
Score: 0.164
-
Remote beam output audits: a global assessment of results out of tolerance. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jul; 7:39-44.
Score: 0.163
-
A New Anthropomorphic Pediatric Spine Phantom for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing. Int J Part Ther. 2018; 4(4):20-27.
Score: 0.161
-
Reference dosimetry data and modeling challenges for Elekta accelerators based on IROC-Houston site visit data. Med Phys. 2018 May; 45(5):2337-2344.
Score: 0.158
-
An FMEA evaluation of intensity modulated radiation therapy dose delivery failures at tolerance criteria levels. Med Phys. 2017 Nov; 44(11):5575-5583.
Score: 0.153
-
AAPM TG 158: Measurement and calculation of doses outside the treated volume from external-beam radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2017 Oct; 44(10):e391-e429.
Score: 0.151
-
Development of a Monte Carlo multiple source model for inclusion in a dose calculation auditing tool. Med Phys. 2017 Sep; 44(9):4943-4951.
Score: 0.151
-
Development of a flattening filter free multiple source model for use as an independent, Monte Carlo, dose calculation, quality assurance tool for clinical trials. Med Phys. 2017 Sep; 44(9):4952-4960.
Score: 0.151
-
Pencil Beam Algorithms Are Unsuitable for?Proton Dose Calculations in Lung. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 11 01; 99(3):750-756.
Score: 0.149
-
Treatment Planning System Calculation Errors Are Present in Most Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core-Houston Phantom Failures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 08 01; 98(5):1197-1203.
Score: 0.147
-
TLD and OSLD dosimetry systems for remote audits of radiotherapy external beam calibration. Radiat Meas. 2017 11; 106:412-415.
Score: 0.145
-
Examining credentialing criteria and poor performance indicators for IROC Houston's anthropomorphic head and neck phantom. Med Phys. 2016 Dec; 43(12):6491.
Score: 0.144
-
Approaches to reducing photon dose calculation errors near metal implants. Med Phys. 2016 Sep; 43(9):5117.
Score: 0.141
-
Modification and validation of an analytical source model for external beam radiotherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations. Med Phys. 2016 Aug; 43(8):4842.
Score: 0.140
-
Technical Report: Reference photon dosimetry data for Varian accelerators based on IROC-Houston site visit data. Med Phys. 2016 May; 43(5):2374.
Score: 0.138
-
Agreement Between Institutional Measurements and Treatment Planning System Calculations for Basic Dosimetric Parameters as Measured by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core-Houston. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 08 01; 95(5):1527-1534.
Score: 0.137
-
Results From the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston's Anthropomorphic Phantoms Used for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 01; 95(1):242-248.
Score: 0.136
-
Characterization of the nanoDot OSLD dosimeter in CT. Med Phys. 2015 Apr; 42(4):1797-807.
Score: 0.128
-
An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2015 Feb 07; 60(3):1047-67.
Score: 0.126
-
Toward optimizing patient-specific IMRT QA techniques in the accurate detection of dosimetrically acceptable and unacceptable patient plans. Med Phys. 2014 Dec; 41(12):121702.
Score: 0.125
-
A six-year review of more than 13,000 patient-specific IMRT QA results from 13 different treatment sites. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Sep 08; 15(5):4935.
Score: 0.123
-
Effects of spatial resolution and noise on gamma analysis for IMRT QA. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Jul 08; 15(4):4690.
Score: 0.122
-
Reproducibility in patient-specific IMRT QA. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 May 08; 15(3):4741.
Score: 0.120
-
Comparison of 2D and 3D gamma analyses. Med Phys. 2014 Feb; 41(2):021710.
Score: 0.118
-
Investigation of various energy deposition kernel refinements for the convolution/superposition method. Med Phys. 2013 Dec; 40(12):121721.
Score: 0.117
-
Development and implementation of a remote audit tool for high dose rate (HDR) Ir-192 brachytherapy using optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry. Med Phys. 2013 Nov; 40(11):112102.
Score: 0.116
-
Development of a modified head and neck quality assurance phantom for use in stereotactic radiosurgery trials. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 Jul 08; 14(4):4313.
Score: 0.114
-
Accuracy and sources of error of out-of field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system for intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 Mar 04; 14(2):4139.
Score: 0.111
-
The Radiological Physics Center's standard dataset for small field size output factors. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 08 08; 13(5):3962.
Score: 0.107
-
SU-E-T-86: Development and Implementation of the Use of Optically Stimulated Luminescent Detectors in the Radiological Physics Center Anthropomorphic Quality Assurance Phantoms. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part11):3722.
Score: 0.105
-
SU-E-T-223: High-Energy Photon Standard Dosimetry Data: A Quality Assurance Tool. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part13):3754.
Score: 0.105
-
SU-E-T-447: Evaluation of the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) Heterogeneity Correction Dose Calculation in Flattened and Flattening- Filter-Free (FFF) Beams for High Energy X-Ray Beams Using the Radiological Physics Center (RPC) Lung Phantom. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part17):3807.
Score: 0.105
-
SU-E-T-190: Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Modified, Anthropomorphic, Head, Quality Assurance Phantom for Use in Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3746-3747.
Score: 0.105
-
MO-D-BRB-02: The Radiological Physics Center's Quality Audit Program: Where Can We Improve? Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part21):3866.
Score: 0.105
-
MO-D-BRB-05: An Analysis of 13,000 Patient-Specific IMRT QA Results from 13 Different Clinical Treatment Services. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part21):3866-3867.
Score: 0.105
-
Energy response of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters for non-reference measurement locations in a 6 MV photon beam. Phys Med Biol. 2012 May 07; 57(9):2505-15.
Score: 0.104
-
Assessment of shoulder position variation and its impact on IMRT and VMAT doses for head and neck cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2012 Feb 08; 7:19.
Score: 0.103
-
Erratum: "Secondary neutron spectra from modern Varian, Siemens, and Elekta linacs with multileaf collimators" [Med. Phys. 36(9), 4027-4038 (2009)]. Med Phys. 2011 Dec; 38(12):6789.
Score: 0.102
-
The clinical impact of the couch top and rails on IMRT and arc therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2011 Dec 07; 56(23):7435-47.
Score: 0.101
-
Variations in photon energy spectra of a 6 MV beam and their impact on TLD response. Med Phys. 2011 May; 38(5):2619-28.
Score: 0.098
-
Secondary neutron spectra from modern Varian, Siemens, and Elekta linacs with multileaf collimators. Med Phys. 2009 Sep; 36(9):4027-38.
Score: 0.087
-
The use of LiF (TLD-100) as an out-of-field dosimeter. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2007 Sep 24; 8(4):169-175.
Score: 0.076
-
A Monte Carlo model for out-of-field dose calculation from high-energy photon therapy. Med Phys. 2007 Sep; 34(9):3489-99.
Score: 0.076
-
Uncertainty of calculated risk estimates for secondary malignancies after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 15; 68(4):1265-71.
Score: 0.075
-
A Monte Carlo model for calculating out-of-field dose from a varian 6 MV beam. Med Phys. 2006 Nov; 33(11):4405-13.
Score: 0.071
-
The calculated risk of fatal secondary malignancies from intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 15; 62(4):1195-203.
Score: 0.065
-
Out-of-field photon and neutron dose equivalents from step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 15; 62(4):1204-16.
Score: 0.065
-
Neutron source strength measurements for Varian, Siemens, Elekta, and General Electric linear accelerators. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2003; 4(3):189-94.
Score: 0.055
-
Body region-specific 3D age-scaling functions for scaling whole-body computed tomography anatomy for pediatric late effects studies. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2022 02 01; 8(2).
Score: 0.051
-
Quality assurance in radiation oncology. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 05; 68 Suppl 2:e28609.
Score: 0.049
-
Our Experience Leading a Large Medical Physics Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jul-Aug; 6(4):100683.
Score: 0.049
-
Development and validation of an age-scalable cardiac model with substructures for dosimetry in late-effects studies of childhood cancer survivors. Radiother Oncol. 2020 12; 153:163-171.
Score: 0.047
-
A Mail Audit Independent Peer Review System for Dosimetry Verification of a Small Animal Irradiator. Radiat Res. 2020 04; 193(4):341-350.
Score: 0.045
-
Management of radiotherapy patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators: A Report of the AAPM TG-203?. Med Phys. 2019 Dec; 46(12):e757-e788.
Score: 0.044
-
A comparison of IROC and ACDS on-site audits of reference and non-reference dosimetry. Med Phys. 2019 Dec; 46(12):5878-5887.
Score: 0.044
-
Testing the methodology for a dosimetric end-to-end audit of IMRT/VMAT: results of IAEA multicentre and national studies. Acta Oncol. 2019 Dec; 58(12):1731-1739.
Score: 0.043
-
The Importance of Imaging in Radiation Oncology for National Clinical Trials Network Protocols. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 11 15; 102(4):775-782.
Score: 0.041
-
A multinational audit of small field output factors calculated by treatment planning systems used in radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jan; 5:58-63.
Score: 0.039
-
Angular dependence of the nanoDot OSL dosimeter. Med Phys. 2011 Jul; 38(7):3955-62.
Score: 0.025
-
Effects of tertiary MLC configuration on secondary neutron spectra from 18 MV x-ray beams for the Varian 21EX linear accelerator. Med Phys. 2009 Sep; 36(9):4039-46.
Score: 0.022