Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by DAVID S FOLLOWILL and GEOFFREY IBBOTT.
Connection Strength
5.012
-
Quality assurance for clinical trials. Front Oncol. 2013 Dec 19; 3:311.
Score: 0.489
-
The Radiological Physics Center's standard dataset for small field size output factors. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 08 08; 13(5):3962.
Score: 0.445
-
MO-D-BRB-02: The Radiological Physics Center's Quality Audit Program: Where Can We Improve? Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part21):3866.
Score: 0.439
-
In regards to Dr. Eisbruch A et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009. Electronic publication, June 17, 2009.). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Feb 01; 76(2):639; author reply 639.
Score: 0.373
-
Design, development, and implementation of the radiological physics center's pelvis and thorax anthropomorphic quality assurance phantoms. Med Phys. 2007 Jun; 34(6):2070-6.
Score: 0.310
-
Independent evaluations of IMRT through the use of an anthropomorphic phantom. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Oct; 5(5):481-7.
Score: 0.296
-
Comparison of electron beam characteristics from multiple accelerators. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jul 01; 59(3):905-10.
Score: 0.253
-
Neutron source strength measurements for Varian, Siemens, Elekta, and General Electric linear accelerators. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2003; 4(3):189-94.
Score: 0.228
-
Development of a Monte Carlo multiple source model for inclusion in a dose calculation auditing tool. Med Phys. 2017 Sep; 44(9):4943-4951.
Score: 0.157
-
Development of a flattening filter free multiple source model for use as an independent, Monte Carlo, dose calculation, quality assurance tool for clinical trials. Med Phys. 2017 Sep; 44(9):4952-4960.
Score: 0.157
-
Modification and validation of an analytical source model for external beam radiotherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations. Med Phys. 2016 Aug; 43(8):4842.
Score: 0.146
-
Robert J. Shalek, Ph.D., J.D. Med Phys. 2016 Jul; 43(7):4396.
Score: 0.146
-
Relative stopping power measurements to aid in the design of anthropomorphic phantoms for proton radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Mar 06; 15(2):4523.
Score: 0.124
-
Independent dose per monitor unit review of eight U.S.A. proton treatment facilities. Med Phys. 2014 Jan; 41(1):012103.
Score: 0.122
-
Development of a modified head and neck quality assurance phantom for use in stereotactic radiosurgery trials. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 Jul 08; 14(4):4313.
Score: 0.118
-
Credentialing results from IMRT irradiations of an anthropomorphic head and neck phantom. Med Phys. 2013 Feb; 40(2):022101.
Score: 0.115
-
SU-E-T-95: Investigation of 3D Dosimetry for an Anthropomorphic Spine Phantom. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part11):3724.
Score: 0.110
-
SU-E-T-190: Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Modified, Anthropomorphic, Head, Quality Assurance Phantom for Use in Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3746-3747.
Score: 0.110
-
MO-D-BRB-04: The Approval Process for the Use of Proton Therapy in NCI-Sponsored Clinical Trials. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part21):3866.
Score: 0.110
-
MO-D-BRB-03: Comparison of Proton Therapy Institutional Data Collected by the RPC. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part21):3866.
Score: 0.110
-
Angular dependence of the nanoDot OSL dosimeter. Med Phys. 2011 Jul; 38(7):3955-62.
Score: 0.103
-
Technical note: Heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom. Med Phys. 2008 Dec; 35(12):5434-9.
Score: 0.086
-
Challenges in credentialing institutions and participants in advanced technology multi-institutional clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 71(1 Suppl):S71-5.
Score: 0.081
-
Accuracy of two heterogeneity dose calculation algorithms for IMRT in treatment plans designed using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom. Med Phys. 2007 May; 34(5):1850-7.
Score: 0.077
-
Design and implementation of an anthropomorphic quality assurance phantom for intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Oct 01; 63(2):577-83.
Score: 0.069
-
A reanalysis of the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Medium Tumor Trial eye plaque dosimetry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jul 01; 56(3):889-98.
Score: 0.059
-
Differences in electron beam dosimetry using two commercial ionization chambers and the TG-21 protocol: another reason to switch to TG-51. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2003; 4(2):124-31.
Score: 0.057
-
Model for Estimating Power and Downtime Effects on Teletherapy Units in Low-Resource Settings. J Glob Oncol. 2017 Oct; 3(5):563-571.
Score: 0.038
-
Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 Protocol for Clinical Reference Dosimetry of High-Energy Photon Beams. Igaku Butsuri. 2017; 37(1):2-24.
Score: 0.038
-
Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams. Med Phys. 2014 Apr; 41(4):041501.
Score: 0.031
-
Predictability of electron cone ratios with respect to linac make and model. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2003; 4(2):172-8.
Score: 0.014