Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by RITSUKO KOMAKI and HOMER A MACAPINLAC.
Connection Strength

0.160
  1. Clinical staging of patients with early esophageal adenocarcinoma: does FDG-PET/CT have a role? J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Aug; 9(8):1202-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  2. Prediction of survival by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiation therapy: results of the ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 20; 31(30):3823-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  3. Intrathoracic patterns of failure for non-small-cell lung cancer with positron-emission tomography/computed tomography-defined target delineation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Dec 01; 69(5):1409-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  4. Detection of interval distant metastases: clinical utility of integrated CT-PET imaging in patients with esophageal carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy. Cancer. 2007 Jan 01; 109(1):125-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  5. Preoperative chemo-radiation-induced ulceration in patients with esophageal cancer: a confounding factor in tumor response assessment in integrated computed tomographic-positron emission tomographic imaging. J Thorac Oncol. 2006 Jun; 1(5):478-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  6. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography predicts outcome of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb 20; 23(6):1136-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  7. 2-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography imaging is predictive of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer. 2004 Oct 15; 101(8):1776-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  8. Utility of PET, CT, and EUS to identify pathologic responders in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Oct; 78(4):1152-60; discussion 1152-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.