Connection

ADAM S GARDEN to Xerostomia

This is a "connection" page, showing publications ADAM S GARDEN has written about Xerostomia.
Connection Strength

1.898
  1. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy and xerostomia. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep; 34(9):743-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.241
  2. How to reduce radiation-related toxicity in patients with cancer of the head and neck. Curr Oncol Rep. 2006 Mar; 8(2):140-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  3. Genetic susceptibility to patient-reported xerostomia among long-term oropharyngeal cancer survivors. Sci Rep. 2022 04 22; 12(1):6662.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  4. Determinants of patient-reported xerostomia among long-term oropharyngeal cancer survivors. Cancer. 2021 12 01; 127(23):4470-4480.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  5. Intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer reduces rates of late xerostomia. Radiother Oncol. 2021 07; 160:32-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  6. Xerostomia-related quality of life for patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with proton therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2020 01; 142:133-139.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  7. Patient reported dry mouth: Instrument comparison and model performance for correlation with quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors. Radiother Oncol. 2018 01; 126(1):75-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  8. Submandibular gland-sparing radiation therapy for locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: patterns of failure and xerostomia outcomes. Radiat Oncol. 2014 Nov 26; 9:255.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  9. Salivary flow rates measured during radiation therapy in head and neck cancer patients: a pilot study assessing salivary sediment formation. J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Aug; 100(2):142-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  10. Open-label, long-term safety study of cevimeline in the treatment of postirradiation xerostomia. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Dec 01; 69(5):1369-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  11. Erratum to "Clinical evaluation of the intraoral fluoride releasing system in radiation-induced xerostomic subjects. Part 2: Phase I study". Oral Oncol. 2007 Jan; 43(1):98-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  12. Clinical evaluation of the intraoral fluoride releasing system in radiation-induced xerostomic subjects. Part 1: Fluorides. Oral Oncol. 2006 Oct; 42(9):934-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  13. Clinical evaluation of the intraoral fluoride releasing system in radiation-induced xerostomic subjects. Part 2: Phase I study. Oral Oncol. 2006 Oct; 42(9):946-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  14. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: is xerostomia still prevalent? Curr Oncol Rep. 2005 Mar; 7(2):131-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  15. Radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer: pathogenesis, impact on quality of life, and management. Head Neck. 2004 Sep; 26(9):796-807.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  16. Toward a model-based patient selection strategy for proton therapy: External validation of photon-derived normal tissue complication probability models in a head and neck proton therapy cohort. Radiother Oncol. 2016 12; 121(3):381-386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  17. Favorable patient reported outcomes following IMRT for early carcinomas of the tonsillar fossa: Results from a symptom assessment study. Radiother Oncol. 2015 Oct; 117(1):132-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  18. Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15; 89(4):846-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  19. Measuring head and neck cancer symptom burden: the development and validation of the M. D. Anderson symptom inventory, head and neck module. Head Neck. 2007 Oct; 29(10):923-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.