Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by HEATH SKINNER and VLAD SANDULACHE.
Connection Strength

4.491
  1. Use of biguanides to improve response to chemotherapy. Methods Mol Biol. 2014; 1165:3-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.470
  2. FAK Drives Resistance to Therapy in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer in a p53-Dependent Manner. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 01 05; 30(1):187-197.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.235
  3. Phase I / II trial of metformin as a chemo-radiosensitizer in a head and neck cancer patient population. Oral Oncol. 2023 10; 145:106536.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.229
  4. Evolution of cisplatin resistance through coordinated metabolic reprogramming of the cellular reductive state. Br J Cancer. 2023 06; 128(11):2013-2024.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  5. Metabolic targeting, immunotherapy and radiation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Where do we go from here? Front Oncol. 2022; 12:1016217.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  6. p16 Represses DNA Damage Repair via a Novel Ubiquitin-Dependent Signaling Cascade. Cancer Res. 2022 03 01; 82(5):916-928.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.207
  7. Oropharyngeal cancer outcomes correlate with p16 status, multinucleation and immune infiltration. Mod Pathol. 2022 08; 35(8):1045-1054.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.206
  8. Metformin generates profound alterations in systemic and tumor immunity with associated antitumor effects. J Immunother Cancer. 2021 07; 9(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.198
  9. High expression of oxidative phosphorylation genes predicts improved survival in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck and lung. Sci Rep. 2020 04 14; 10(1):6380.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  10. Innovations in risk-stratification and treatment of Veterans with oropharynx cancer; roadmap of the 2019 Field Based Meeting. Oral Oncol. 2020 03; 102:104440.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  11. Early glottic cancer in a veteran population: Impact of race on management and outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2020 07; 130(7):1733-1739.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  12. Swallowing Function in Survivors of Oropharyngeal Cancer Is Associated With Advanced T Classification. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019 Aug; 128(8):696-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  13. Metabolic interrogation as a tool to optimize chemotherapeutic regimens. Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 14; 8(11):18154-18165.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  14. Salvage total laryngectomy after external-beam radiotherapy: A 20-year experience. Head Neck. 2016 04; 38 Suppl 1:E1962-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  15. Acute Tumor Lactate Perturbations as a Biomarker of Genotoxic Stress: Development of a Biochemical Model. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015 Dec; 14(12):2901-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  16. Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the veteran population: Association with traditional carcinogen exposure and poor clinical outcomes. Head Neck. 2015 Sep; 37(9):1246-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  17. Association between metformin use and improved survival in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2014 Jul; 36(7):1039-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  18. Evaluation of hyperpolarized [1-??C]-pyruvate by magnetic resonance to detect ionizing radiation effects in real time. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e87031.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  19. Evaluating response to metformin/cisplatin combination in cancer cells via metabolic measurement and clonogenic survival. Methods Mol Biol. 2014; 1165:11-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  20. Impact of race/ethnicity on laryngeal cancer in patients treated at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Laryngoscope. 2013 Sep; 123(9):2170-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  21. Metformin use and improved response to therapy in rectal cancer. Cancer Med. 2013 Feb; 2(1):99-107.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  22. Residual nodal disease in patients with advanced-stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive radiation therapy and posttreatment neck dissection: Association with locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and decreased survival. Head Neck. 2013 Oct; 35(10):1454-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  23. Metformin use and improved response to therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Acta Oncol. 2013 Jun; 52(5):1002-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  24. Glycolytic inhibition alters anaplastic thyroid carcinoma tumor metabolism and improves response to conventional chemotherapy and radiation. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Jun; 11(6):1373-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  25. TP53 disruptive mutations lead to head and neck cancer treatment failure through inhibition of radiation-induced senescence. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jan 01; 18(1):290-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  26. Individualizing antimetabolic treatment strategies for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma based on TP53 mutational status. Cancer. 2012 Feb 01; 118(3):711-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  27. Demographic and Tumor Characteristic Impact on Laryngeal Cancer Outcomes in a Minority Underserved Patient Population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jun; 162(6):888-896.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  28. Impact of race on oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma presentation and outcomes among veterans. Head Neck. 2016 Jan; 38(1):44-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  29. Gain-of-function mutant p53 promotes cell growth and cancer cell metabolism via inhibition of AMPK activation. Mol Cell. 2014 Jun 19; 54(6):960-974.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  30. Integration of cancer genomics with treatment selection: from the genome to predictive biomarkers. Cancer. 2013 Nov 15; 119(22):3914-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  31. Improving imaging diagnosis of persistent nodal metastases after definitive therapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma: specific signs for CT and best performance of combined criteria. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Aug; 34(8):1637-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.