Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by ELIAS JOSEPH JABBOUR and KOICHI TAKAHASHI.
Connection Strength

8.100
  1. Low-dose dasatinib 50?mg/day versus standard-dose dasatinib 100?mg/day as frontline therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: A propensity score analysis. Am J Hematol. 2022 Nov; 97(11):1413-1418.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  2. High-sensitivity next-generation sequencing MRD assessment in ALL identifies patients at very low risk of relapse. Blood Adv. 2022 07 12; 6(13):4006-4014.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  3. Correction: Genetic correlates in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with Hyper-CVAD plus dasatinib or ponatinib. Leukemia. 2022 May; 36(5):1448.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  4. Dismal outcomes of patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia after failure of both inotuzumab ozogamicin and blinatumomab. Am J Hematol. 2022 06 01; 97(6):E201-E204.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.216
  5. Genetic correlates in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with Hyper-CVAD plus dasatinib or ponatinib. Leukemia. 2022 05; 36(5):1253-1260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.215
  6. Outcomes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with KMT2A (MLL) rearrangement: the MD Anderson experience. Blood Adv. 2021 12 14; 5(23):5415-5419.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  7. Hyper-CVAD plus ofatumumab versus hyper-CVAD plus rituximab as frontline therapy in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A propensity score analysis. Cancer. 2021 09 15; 127(18):3381-3389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  8. Leukemia stemness and co-occurring mutations drive resistance to IDH inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Commun. 2021 05 10; 12(1):2607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  9. Author Correction: Clonal evolution of acute myeloid leukemia revealed by high-throughput single-cell genomics. Nat Commun. 2021 May 10; 12(1):2823.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  10. Outcome of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in lymphoid blastic phase and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with hyper-CVAD and dasatinib. Cancer. 2021 08 01; 127(15):2641-2647.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  11. Outcome of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: Focus on near-ETP phenotype and differential impact of nelarabine. Am J Hematol. 2021 05 01; 96(5):589-598.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  12. Publisher Correction: Clonal evolution of acute myeloid leukemia revealed by high-throughput single-cell genomics. Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 19; 11(1):5996.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  13. Clonal evolution of acute myeloid leukemia revealed by high-throughput single-cell genomics. Nat Commun. 2020 10 21; 11(1):5327.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  14. Hyper-CVAD regimen in combination with ofatumumab as frontline therapy for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2020 Jul; 7(7):e523-e533.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  15. The early achievement of measurable residual disease negativity in the treatment of adults with Philadelphia-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia is a strong predictor for survival. Am J Hematol. 2020 02; 95(2):144-150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  16. Integrative genomic analysis of adult mixed phenotype acute leukemia delineates lineage associated molecular subtypes. Nat Commun. 2018 07 10; 9(1):2670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  17. Clearance of Somatic Mutations at Remission and the Risk of Relapse in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2018 06 20; 36(18):1788-1797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  18. Salvage Chemoimmunotherapy With Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Combined With Mini-Hyper-CVD for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Feb 01; 4(2):230-234.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  19. Safety and Efficacy of Blinatumomab in Combination With a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Relapsed Philadelphia Chromosome-positive Leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017 Dec; 17(12):897-901.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  20. TP53 mutation does not confer a poor outcome in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who are treated with frontline hyper-CVAD-based regimens. Cancer. 2017 Oct 01; 123(19):3717-3724.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  21. A propensity score matching analysis of dasatinib and nilotinib as a frontline therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Cancer. 2016 Nov 15; 122(21):3336-3343.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  22. Clinical implications of TP53 mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes treated with hypomethylating agents. Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 22; 7(12):14172-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  23. Acute promyelocytic leukemia presented as a relapse of acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2016 Jun; 91(4):E274-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  24. Clofarabine Plus Low-Dose Cytarabine Is as Effective as and Less Toxic Than Intensive Chemotherapy in Elderly AML Patients. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016 Mar; 16(3):163-8.e1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  25. t(9;22) as secondary alteration in core-binding factor de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2015 Nov; 90(11):E211-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  26. Acquisition of cytogenetic abnormalities in patients with IPSS defined lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome is associated with poor prognosis and transformation to acute myelogenous leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2013 Oct; 88(10):831-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  27. Influence of co-mutational patterns in disease phenotype and clinical outcomes of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2024 Feb 28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  28. Prognostic risk signature in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with hypomethylating agents and venetoclax. Blood Adv. 2024 Feb 27; 8(4):927-935.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  29. Genetics and pathologic landscape of lineage switch of acute leukemia during therapy. Blood Cancer J. 2024 01 25; 14(1):19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  30. Response patterns and impact of MRD in patients with IDH1/2-mutated AML treated with venetoclax and hypomethylating agents. Blood Cancer J. 2023 09 21; 13(1):148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  31. Phenotypic subtypes of leukaemic transformation in chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2023 11; 203(4):581-592.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  32. Geographic Disparity of Outcome in Patients With Cancer Over Decades: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023 11; 23(11):e369-e378.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  33. A Phase Ib/II Study of Ivosidenib with Venetoclax ? Azacitidine in IDH1-Mutated Myeloid Malignancies. Blood Cancer Discov. 2023 07 05; 4(4):276-293.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  34. Philadelphia-Like Genetic Rearrangements in Adults With B-Cell ALL: Refractoriness to Chemotherapy and Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in ABL Class Rearrangements. JCO Precis Oncol. 2023 05; 7:e2200707.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  35. Clinical outcomes associated with NPM1 mutations in patients with relapsed or refractory AML. Blood Adv. 2023 03 28; 7(6):933-942.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  36. Implications of RAS mutational status in subsets of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia across therapy subtypes. Am J Hematol. 2022 Dec; 97(12):1599-1606.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  37. Retrospective comparison of survival and responses to Fludarabine, Cytarabine, GCSF (FLAG) in combination with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) or Idarubicin (IDA) in patients with newly diagnosed core binding factor (CBF) acute myelogenous leukemia: MD Anderson experience in 174 patients. Am J Hematol. 2022 Nov; 97(11):1427-1434.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  38. Contemporary outcomes in IDH-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: The impact of co-occurring NPM1 mutations and venetoclax-based treatment. Am J Hematol. 2022 Nov; 97(11):1443-1452.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  39. Azacitidine plus venetoclax in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia: phase 1 results of a single-centre, dose-escalation, dose-expansion, phase 1-2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2022 Oct; 9(10):e756-e765.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  40. Phase II Study of Venetoclax Added to Cladribine Plus Low-Dose Cytarabine Alternating With 5-Azacitidine in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2022 11 20; 40(33):3848-3857.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  41. Venetoclax combined with FLAG-IDA induction and consolidation in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2022 08; 97(8):1035-1043.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  42. Inhibition of mitochondrial complex I reverses NOTCH1-driven metabolic reprogramming in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Commun. 2022 05 19; 13(1):2801.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  43. Hypomethylating agent and venetoclax with FLT3 inhibitor "triplet" therapy in older/unfit patients with FLT3 mutated AML. Blood Cancer J. 2022 05 02; 12(5):77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  44. Venetoclax combined with induction chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia: a post-hoc, propensity score-matched, cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2022 May; 9(5):e350-e360.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  45. A multi-arm phase Ib/II study designed for rapid, parallel evaluation of novel immunotherapy combinations in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2022 09; 63(9):2161-2170.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  46. Development of TP53 mutations over the course of therapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2021 11 01; 96(11):1420-1428.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  47. Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax for First-line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Nonrandomized Phase 2 Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Aug 01; 7(8):1213-1219.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  48. Venetoclax Combined With FLAG-IDA Induction and Consolidation in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2021 09 01; 39(25):2768-2778.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  49. Ibrutinib, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab (iFCG) regimen for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with mutated IGHV and without TP53 aberrations. Leukemia. 2021 12; 35(12):3421-3429.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  50. Clinicopathologic correlates and natural history of atypical chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2021 09 01; 127(17):3113-3124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  51. Impact of splicing mutations in acute myeloid leukemia treated with hypomethylating agents combined with venetoclax. Blood Adv. 2021 04 27; 5(8):2173-2183.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  52. Prognostic value of measurable residual disease after venetoclax and decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2021 04 13; 5(7):1876-1883.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  53. Outcomes of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia after frontline hypomethylating agent and venetoclax regimens. Haematologica. 2021 03 01; 106(3):894-898.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  54. Correction to: Outcomes with sequential FLT3-inhibitor-based therapies in patients with AML. J Hematol Oncol. 2021 Feb 23; 14(1):34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  55. Triplet therapy with venetoclax, FLT3 inhibitor and decitabine for FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 2021 02 01; 11(2):25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  56. Venetoclax with decitabine vs intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia: A propensity score matched analysis stratified by risk of treatment-related mortality. Am J Hematol. 2021 03 01; 96(3):282-291.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  57. Patterns of Resistance Differ in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Type I versus Type II FLT3 inhibitors. Blood Cancer Discov. 2021 03; 2(2):125-134.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  58. The LEukemia Artificial Intelligence Program (LEAP) in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: A model to improve patient outcomes. Am J Hematol. 2021 02 01; 96(2):241-250.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  59. Clinical outcomes and influence of mutation clonal dominance in oligomonocytic and classical chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2021 02 01; 96(2):E50-E53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  60. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia with concurrent FLT3-ITD and IDH mutations. Cancer. 2021 02 01; 127(3):381-390.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  61. Outcomes with sequential FLT3-inhibitor-based therapies in patients with AML. J Hematol Oncol. 2020 10 08; 13(1):132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  62. Natural history of newly diagnosed myelodysplastic syndrome with isolated inv(3)/t(3;3). Am J Hematol. 2020 12; 95(12):E326-E329.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  63. 10-day decitabine with venetoclax for newly diagnosed intensive chemotherapy ineligible, and relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: a single-centre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2020 Oct; 7(10):e724-e736.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  64. Germline DNMT3A mutation in familial acute myeloid leukaemia. Epigenetics. 2021 05; 16(5):567-576.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  65. Phase II trial of CPX-351 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia at high risk for induction mortality. Leukemia. 2020 11; 34(11):2914-2924.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  66. Targeted next-generation sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA vs bone marrow in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2020 04 28; 4(8):1670-1677.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  67. Outcomes of older patients with NPM1-mutated AML: current treatments and the promise of venetoclax-based regimens. Blood Adv. 2020 04 14; 4(7):1311-1320.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  68. Outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia related changes depend on diagnostic criteria and therapy. Am J Hematol. 2020 06; 95(6):612-622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  69. Genomic context and TP53 allele frequency define clinical outcomes in TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood Adv. 2020 02 11; 4(3):482-495.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  70. Impact of the variant allele frequency of ASXL1, DNMT3A, JAK2, TET2, TP53, and NPM1 on the outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2020 02 15; 126(4):765-774.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  71. Long-term follow-up of lower dose dasatinib (50?mg daily) as frontline therapy in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2020 01 01; 126(1):67-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  72. Idarubicin, cytarabine, and nivolumab in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Sep; 6(9):e480-e488.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  73. Ibrutinib and Venetoclax for First-Line Treatment of CLL. N Engl J Med. 2019 05 30; 380(22):2095-2103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  74. NPM1 mutations define a specific subgroup of MDS and MDS/MPN patients with favorable outcomes with intensive chemotherapy. Blood Adv. 2019 03 26; 3(6):922-933.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  75. NPM1 mutant variant allele frequency correlates with leukemia burden but does not provide prognostic information in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2019 06; 94(6):E158-E160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  76. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential-associated mutations and risk of comorbidities in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer. 2019 07 01; 125(13):2233-2241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  77. Incidence of second malignancies in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Int J Hematol. 2019 May; 109(5):545-552.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  78. Late relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): clonal evolution or therapy-related leukemia? Blood Cancer J. 2019 01 16; 9(2):7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  79. Phase II Trial of MEK Inhibitor Binimetinib (MEK162) in RAS-mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 03; 19(3):142-148.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  80. A phase II study of omacetaxine mepesuccinate for patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia after failure of hypomethylating agents. Am J Hematol. 2019 01; 94(1):74-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  81. A phase 2 study of ruxolitinib in combination with azacitidine in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2018 10 18; 132(16):1664-1674.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  82. Early results of lower dose dasatinib (50?mg daily) as frontline therapy for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2018 07 01; 124(13):2740-2747.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  83. Outcomes with lower intensity therapy in TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 09; 59(9):2238-2241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  84. Impact of the number of mutations in survival and response outcomes to hypomethylating agents in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. Oncotarget. 2018 Feb 09; 9(11):9714-9727.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  85. Prediction for sustained deep molecular response of BCR-ABL1 levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Cancer. 2018 03 15; 124(6):1160-1168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  86. Treated secondary acute myeloid leukemia: a distinct high-risk subset of AML with adverse prognosis. Blood Adv. 2017 Jul 25; 1(17):1312-1323.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  87. Natural history of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia treated with hypomethylating agents. Am J Hematol. 2017 Jul; 92(7):599-606.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  88. Characteristics and outcomes of older patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia according to treatment approach. Cancer. 2017 Aug 15; 123(16):3050-3060.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  89. More than 1 TP53 abnormality is a dominant characteristic of pure erythroid leukemia. Blood. 2017 05 04; 129(18):2584-2587.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  90. Outcome of Patients With Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia With or Without a History of Myelodysplasia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016 11; 16(11):616-624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  91. TP53 mutations in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: Clinicomolecular characteristics, response to therapy, and outcomes. Cancer. 2016 Nov 15; 122(22):3484-3491.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  92. Frontline therapy with high-dose imatinib versus second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia - a propensity score analysis. Haematologica. 2016 08; 101(8):e324-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  93. Conditional survival in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer. 2016 Jan 15; 122(2):238-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  94. Detectable FLT3-ITD or RAS mutation at the time of transformation from MDS to AML predicts for very poor outcomes. Leuk Res. 2015 Dec; 39(12):1367-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  95. Disseminated histoplasmosis as pseudo Richter's transformation in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2015 Aug; 90(8):752-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  96. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma who develop therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, or acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015 Feb; 15(2):110-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.