Connection

ELIAS JOSEPH JABBOUR to Prognosis

This is a "connection" page, showing publications ELIAS JOSEPH JABBOUR has written about Prognosis.
Connection Strength

2.644
  1. Prognostic impact of pretreatment cytogenetics in adult Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the era of minimal residual disease. Cancer. 2017 02 01; 123(3):459-467.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  2. Outcomes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with KMT2A (MLL) rearrangement: the MD Anderson experience. Blood Adv. 2021 12 14; 5(23):5415-5419.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  3. Prognostic factors for progression in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in complete molecular response within 3 months of therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer. 2021 08 01; 127(15):2648-2656.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  4. Translocation t(1;19)(q23;p13) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia - a distinct subtype with favorable prognosis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2021 01; 62(1):224-228.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  5. Impact of minimal residual disease status in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin in the phase III INO-VATE trial. Leuk Res. 2020 01; 88:106283.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  6. SOHO State of the Art Update and Next Questions: Advances in the Treatment of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 08; 19(8):471-479.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  7. Recent advances in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 11; 60(11):2606-2621.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  8. SOHO State of the Art Update and Next Questions: Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018 07; 18(7):439-446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  9. Inotuzumab ozogamicin in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy for older patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 02; 19(2):240-248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  10. Outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia after blinatumomab failure: No change in the level of CD19 expression. Am J Hematol. 2018 03; 93(3):371-374.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  11. Treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia with inotuzumab ozogamicin. Future Oncol. 2017 Oct; 13(25):2233-2242.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  12. Poor outcomes associated with +der(22)t(9;22) and -9/9p in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving chemotherapy plus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Am J Hematol. 2017 Mar; 92(3):238-243.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  13. Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: How to Recognize and Treat It. Curr Oncol Rep. 2017 Jan; 19(1):6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  14. Persistence of minimal residual disease assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry is highly prognostic in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2017 02 01; 123(3):426-435.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  15. Prognostic significance of day 14 bone marrow evaluation in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2016 Dec 15; 122(24):3812-3820.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  16. Deacetylase inhibitors for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015 May; 56(5):1205-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  17. Prognostic factors for outcome in patients with refractory and relapsed acute lymphocytic leukemia treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin, a CD22 monoclonal antibody. Am J Hematol. 2015 Mar; 90(3):193-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  18. Outcome of patients with low-risk and intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome after hypomethylating agent failure: a report on behalf of the MDS Clinical Research Consortium. Cancer. 2015 Mar 15; 121(6):876-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  19. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation as initial salvage for patients with acute myeloid leukemia refractory to high-dose cytarabine-based induction chemotherapy. Am J Hematol. 2014 Apr; 89(4):395-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  20. Early response with dasatinib or imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: 3-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood. 2014 Jan 23; 123(4):494-500.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  21. Acute myeloid leukemia after myelodysplastic syndrome and failure of therapy with hypomethylating agents: an emerging entity with a poor prognosis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2014 Apr; 14(2):93-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  22. Potential mechanisms of disease progression and management of advanced-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014 Jul; 55(7):1451-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  23. Acquisition of cytogenetic abnormalities in patients with IPSS defined lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome is associated with poor prognosis and transformation to acute myelogenous leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2013 Oct; 88(10):831-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  24. Retrospective analysis of prognostic factors associated with response and overall survival by baseline marrow blast percentage in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes treated with decitabine. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013 Oct; 13(5):592-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  25. The achievement of a 3-month complete cytogenetic response to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors predicts survival in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib failure. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013 Jun; 13(3):302-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  26. Prognostic factors associated with disease progression and overall survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes treated with decitabine. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013 Apr; 13(2):131-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  27. Prediction of outcomes in patients with Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with nilotinib after imatinib resistance/intolerance. Leukemia. 2013 Apr; 27(4):907-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  28. Twice-daily fludarabine and cytarabine combination with or without gentuzumab ozogamicin is effective in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia, high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, and blast- phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2012 Aug; 12(4):244-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  29. Suboptimal responses in chronic myeloid leukemia: implications and management strategies. Cancer. 2012 Mar 01; 118(5):1181-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  30. The achievement of an early complete cytogenetic response is a major determinant for outcome in patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Blood. 2011 Oct 27; 118(17):4541-6; quiz 4759.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  31. Predictive factors for outcome and response in patients treated with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib failure. Blood. 2011 Feb 10; 117(6):1822-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  32. Outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after failure of decitabine therapy. Cancer. 2010 Aug 15; 116(16):3830-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  33. Novel therapies for relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2009 Jul; 4(3):148-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  34. Imatinib mesylate dose escalation is associated with durable responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after cytogenetic failure on standard-dose imatinib therapy. Blood. 2009 Mar 05; 113(10):2154-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  35. Characteristics and outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia patients with F317L BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation after therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Blood. 2008 Dec 15; 112(13):4839-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  36. Current perspectives on the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: an individualized approach to treatment. Cancer J. 2007 Nov-Dec; 13(6):357-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  37. Pretransplant positive positron emission tomography/gallium scans predict poor outcome in patients with recurrent/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer. 2007 Jun 15; 109(12):2481-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  38. New agents in myelodysplastic syndromes. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2006 Mar; 1(1):25-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  39. Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005 Nov; 80(11):1517-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  40. New agents in myelodysplastic syndromes. Curr Hematol Rep. 2005 May; 4(3):191-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  41. Influence of co-mutational patterns in disease phenotype and clinical outcomes of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2024 May; 38(5):1178-1181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  42. Prognostic risk signature in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with hypomethylating agents and venetoclax. Blood Adv. 2024 Feb 27; 8(4):927-935.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  43. SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions, Measurable Residual Disease in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024 Jul; 24(7):427-432.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  44. Phase 1/2 study of CPX-351 for patients with Int-2 or high risk International Prognostic Scoring System myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia after failure to hypomethylating agents. Br J Haematol. 2024 Mar; 204(3):898-909.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  45. Performance of IPSS-M in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after hypomethylating agent failure. Am J Hematol. 2023 10; 98(10):E281-E284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  46. Undetectable measurable residual disease is associated with improved outcomes in AML irrespective of treatment intensity. Blood Adv. 2023 07 11; 7(13):3284-3296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  47. Ultrasensitive NGS MRD assessment in Ph+?ALL: Prognostic impact and correlation with RT-PCR for BCR::ABL1. Am J Hematol. 2023 08; 98(8):1196-1203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  48. Association between bariatric surgery and outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2023 06 15; 129(12):1866-1872.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  49. Prediction of survival with lower intensity therapy among older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2023 04 01; 129(7):1017-1029.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  50. Prognostic impact of ASXL1 mutations in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 2022 10 28; 12(10):144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  51. Integrated clinical genotype-phenotype characteristics of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2023 01 01; 129(1):49-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  52. Implications of RAS mutational status in subsets of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia across therapy subtypes. Am J Hematol. 2022 12; 97(12):1599-1606.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  53. Differential prognostic impact of RUNX1 mutations according to frontline therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2022 12; 97(12):1560-1567.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  54. Contemporary outcomes in IDH-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: The impact of co-occurring NPM1 mutations and venetoclax-based treatment. Am J Hematol. 2022 11; 97(11):1443-1452.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  55. Clinical outcomes and impact of therapeutic intervention in patients with acute myeloid leukemia who experience measurable residual disease?(MRD) recurrence following MRD-negative remission. Am J Hematol. 2022 11; 97(11):E408-E411.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  56. TP53 copy number and protein expression inform mutation status across risk categories in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2022 07 07; 140(1):58-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  57. Enhancer retargeting of CDX2 and UBTF::ATXN7L3 define a subtype of high-risk B-progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2022 06 16; 139(24):3519-3531.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  58. Prediction of survival with intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2022 07; 97(7):865-876.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  59. Prediction of early (4-week) mortality in acute myeloid leukemia with intensive chemotherapy. Am J Hematol. 2022 01 01; 97(1):68-78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  60. Predictors of outcomes in adults with acute myeloid leukemia and KMT2A rearrangements. Blood Cancer J. 2021 09 29; 11(9):162.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  61. B-cell lymphoma/leukaemia 11B (BCL11B) expression status helps distinguish early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL/LBL) from other subtypes of T-cell ALL/LBL. Br J Haematol. 2021 09; 194(6):1034-1038.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  62. Clinical and molecular characterization of myeloid sarcoma without medullary leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2021 12; 62(14):3402-3410.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  63. Only SF3B1 mutation involving K700E independently predicts overall survival in myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer. 2021 10 01; 127(19):3552-3565.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  64. Venetoclax Combined With FLAG-IDA Induction and Consolidation in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2021 09 01; 39(25):2768-2778.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  65. Ibrutinib, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab (iFCG) regimen for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with mutated IGHV and without TP53 aberrations. Leukemia. 2021 12; 35(12):3421-3429.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  66. Clinicopathologic correlates and natural history of atypical chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2021 09 01; 127(17):3113-3124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  67. Prognostic value of measurable residual disease after venetoclax and decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2021 04 13; 5(7):1876-1883.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  68. Evolutionary action score identifies a subset of TP53 mutated myelodysplastic syndrome with favorable prognosis. Blood Cancer J. 2021 03 06; 11(3):52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  69. Acute myeloid leukemia: current progress and future directions. Blood Cancer J. 2021 02 22; 11(2):41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  70. GATA3 rs3824662A allele in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults, adolescents and young adults: association with CRLF2 rearrangement and poor prognosis. Am J Hematol. 2021 03 01; 96(3):E71-E74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  71. Prognostic impact of complete remission with MRD negativity in patients with relapsed or refractory AML. Blood Adv. 2020 12 22; 4(24):6117-6126.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  72. Impact of number of cycles on outcomes of patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin. Br J Haematol. 2020 11; 191(3):e77-e81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  73. Inotuzumab ozogamicin for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: outcomes by disease burden. Blood Cancer J. 2020 08 07; 10(8):81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  74. High levels of immunoglobulin expression predict shorter overall survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Eur J Haematol. 2020 Oct; 105(4):449-459.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  75. Phase II trial of CPX-351 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia at high risk for induction mortality. Leukemia. 2020 11; 34(11):2914-2924.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  76. Salvage Therapy Outcomes in a Historical Cohort of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020 11; 20(11):e871-e882.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  77. Hypomethylating Agent Therapy in Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Chromosome 3 Abnormalities. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020 09; 20(9):e597-e605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  78. Genomic context and TP53 allele frequency define clinical outcomes in TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood Adv. 2020 02 11; 4(3):482-495.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  79. FLT3 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia: ten frequently asked questions. Leukemia. 2020 03; 34(3):682-696.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  80. Impact of the variant allele frequency of ASXL1, DNMT3A, JAK2, TET2, TP53, and NPM1 on the outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2020 02 15; 126(4):765-774.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  81. Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia at first relapse in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Am J Hematol. 2019 12; 94(12):1388-1395.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  82. Early T precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma shows differential immunophenotypic characteristics including frequent CD33 expression and in vitro response to targeted CD33 therapy. Br J Haematol. 2019 08; 186(4):538-548.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  83. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential-associated mutations and risk of comorbidities in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer. 2019 07 01; 125(13):2233-2241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  84. Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2019 01 24; 20(1):4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  85. Phase 1/2 study of DFP-10917 administered by continuous intravenous infusion in patients with recurrent or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2019 05 15; 125(10):1665-1673.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  86. A phase 2 study of pracinostat combined with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 07; 60(7):1767-1774.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  87. Validation of the 2017 European LeukemiaNet classification for acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 and FLT3-internal tandem duplication genotypes. Cancer. 2019 04 01; 125(7):1091-1100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  88. Recommendations for the assessment and management of measurable residual disease in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A consensus of North American experts. Am J Hematol. 2019 02; 94(2):257-265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  89. Bone marrow core biopsy in 508 consecutive patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: Assessment of potential value. Cancer. 2018 10 01; 124(19):3849-3855.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  90. Prognosis of patients with intermediate risk IPSS-R myelodysplastic syndrome indicates variable outcomes and need for models beyond IPSS-R. Am J Hematol. 2018 10; 93(10):1245-1253.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  91. P53 protein overexpression in de novo acute myeloid leukemia patients with normal diploid karyotype correlates with FLT3 internal tandem duplication and worse relapse-free survival. Am J Hematol. 2018 11; 93(11):1376-1383.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  92. A phase 2 study of ruxolitinib in combination with azacitidine in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2018 10 18; 132(16):1664-1674.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  93. Blast phase chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: Mayo-MDACC collaborative study of 171 cases. Leukemia. 2018 11; 32(11):2512-2518.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  94. Results of second salvage therapy in 673 adults with acute myelogenous leukemia treated at a single institution since 2000. Cancer. 2018 06 15; 124(12):2534-2540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  95. Updated Results of Rituximab Pre- and Post-BEAM with or without 90Yttrium Ibritumomab Tiuxetan during Autologous Transplant for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 05 15; 24(10):2304-2311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  96. Characteristics and outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia patients with E255K/V BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations. Int J Hematol. 2018 Jun; 107(6):689-695.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  97. Prediction for sustained deep molecular response of BCR-ABL1 levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Cancer. 2018 03 15; 124(6):1160-1168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  98. Prognostic significance of additional chromosomal abnormalities at the time of diagnosis in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Am J Hematol. 2018 01; 93(1):84-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  99. Guadecitabine (SGI-110) in treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: phase 2 results from a multicentre, randomised, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 10; 18(10):1317-1326.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  100. Prognostic factors and survival outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era: Cohort study of 477 patients. Cancer. 2017 Nov 15; 123(22):4391-4402.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  101. Natural history of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia treated with hypomethylating agents. Am J Hematol. 2017 Jul; 92(7):599-606.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  102. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and young adults. Cancer. 2017 Jul 01; 123(13):2398-2403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  103. Relapse risk and survival in patients with FLT3 mutated acute myeloid leukemia undergoing stem cell transplantation. Am J Hematol. 2017 Apr; 92(4):331-337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  104. Phase 2, randomized, double-blind study of pracinostat in combination with azacitidine in patients with untreated, higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer. 2017 May 15; 123(6):994-1002.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  105. Frontline treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in adults. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017 Feb; 110:20-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  106. Peripheral blood blast clearance is an independent prognostic factor for survival and response to acute myeloid leukemia induction chemotherapy. Am J Hematol. 2016 12; 91(12):1221-1226.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  107. A propensity score matching analysis of dasatinib and nilotinib as a frontline therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Cancer. 2016 Nov 15; 122(21):3336-3343.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  108. Clinical implications of TP53 mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes treated with hypomethylating agents. Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 22; 7(12):14172-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  109. Prognostic impact of persistent cytogenetic abnormalities at complete remission in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2016 Jun; 91(4):385-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  110. Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL/LBL) in adolescents and adults: a high-risk subtype. Blood. 2016 Apr 14; 127(15):1863-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  111. Unraveling Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Curr Oncol Rep. 2016 Jan; 18(1):4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  112. Minimal residual disease assessed by multi-parameter flow cytometry is highly prognostic in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2016 Feb; 172(3):392-400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  113. Detectable FLT3-ITD or RAS mutation at the time of transformation from MDS to AML predicts for very poor outcomes. Leuk Res. 2015 Dec; 39(12):1367-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  114. Polycythemia Vera: An Appraisal of the Biology and Management 10 Years After the Discovery of JAK2 V617F. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 20; 33(33):3953-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  115. Safety and tolerability of guadecitabine (SGI-110) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, randomised, dose-escalation phase 1 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep; 16(9):1099-1110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  116. Correlation of mutation profile and response in patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib. Blood. 2015 Aug 06; 126(6):790-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  117. Jumping Translocations in Myeloid Malignancies Associated With Treatment Resistance and Poor Survival. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015 Sep; 15(9):556-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  118. The utility of proadrenomedullin and procalcitonin in comparison to C-reactive protein as predictors of sepsis and bloodstream infections in critically ill patients with cancer*. Crit Care Med. 2014 Dec; 42(12):2500-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  119. Myeloid neoplasms after breast cancer: "therapy-related" not an independent poor prognostic factor. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015 Apr; 56(4):1012-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  120. Cytogenetics, donor type, and use of hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndrome with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Oct; 20(10):1618-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  121. A prognostic model of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome for predicting survival and transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2014 Oct; 14(5):401-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  122. Impact of comorbidities by ACE-27 in the revised-IPSS for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Am J Hematol. 2014 May; 89(5):509-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  123. Lack of association of IDH1, IDH2 and DNMT3A mutations with outcome in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with hypomethylating agents. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014 Aug; 55(8):1925-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  124. Predicting outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia at any time during tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2014 Aug; 14(4):327-334.e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  125. Biological and clinical features of trisomy 21 in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013 Sep; 13 Suppl 2:S276-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  126. Effect of NPM1 and FLT3 mutations on the outcomes of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving standard chemotherapy. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013 Aug; 13(4):435-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  127. Randomized open-label phase II study of decitabine in patients with low- or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 10; 31(20):2548-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  128. Prognostic impact of RAS mutations in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Am J Hematol. 2013 May; 88(5):365-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  129. FLT3 mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2013 Jan; 88(1):56-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  130. Treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with a focus on emerging investigational and targeted therapies. Oncology (Williston Park). 2012 Sep; 26(9):851-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  131. Very long-term follow-up results of imatinib mesylate therapy in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of interferon alpha therapy. Cancer. 2012 Jun 15; 118(12):3116-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  132. Predicting survival of patients with hypocellular myelodysplastic syndrome: development of a disease-specific prognostic score system. Cancer. 2012 Sep 15; 118(18):4462-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  133. Improved survival in chronic myeloid leukemia since the introduction of imatinib therapy: a single-institution historical experience. Blood. 2012 Mar 01; 119(9):1981-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  134. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2011 Jun; 11 Suppl 1:S96-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  135. Prognostic impact of deletions of derivative chromosome 9 in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia treated with nilotinib or dasatinib. Cancer. 2011 Nov 15; 117(22):5085-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  136. Significance of thrombocytopenia in myelodysplastic syndromes: associations and prognostic implications. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2011 Apr; 11(2):237-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  137. Outcome of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia with multiple ABL1 kinase domain mutations receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Haematologica. 2011 Jun; 96(6):918-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  138. Defining the course and prognosis of adults with acute lymphocytic leukemia in first salvage after induction failure or short first remission duration. Cancer. 2010 Dec 15; 116(24):5568-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  139. Intensive chemotherapy does not benefit most older patients (age 70 years or older) with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2010 Nov 25; 116(22):4422-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  140. Failure to achieve a complete hematologic response at the time of a major cytogenetic response with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors is associated with a poor prognosis among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in accelerated or blast phase. Blood. 2009 May 21; 113(21):5058-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  141. Residual DNA methylation at remission is prognostic in adult Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2009 Feb 26; 113(9):1892-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  142. Long-term follow-up of patients who experienced graft failure postallogeneic progenitor cell transplantation. Results of a single institution analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Aug; 14(8):859-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  143. Update of the decitabine experience in higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome and analysis of prognostic factors associated with outcome. Cancer. 2007 Jan 15; 109(2):265-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  144. Validation of the European Prognostic Index for younger adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in first relapse. Br J Haematol. 2006 Jul; 134(1):58-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  145. Results of intensive chemotherapy in 998 patients age 65 years or older with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: predictive prognostic models for outcome. Cancer. 2006 Mar 01; 106(5):1090-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.