Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by MICHAEL GILLIN and NARAYAN SAHOO.
Connection Strength
3.264
-
A procedure for calculation of monitor units for passively scattered proton radiotherapy beams. Med Phys. 2008 Nov; 35(11):5088-97.
Score: 0.332
-
Evaluation of the high definition field of view option of a large-bore computed tomography scanner for radiation therapy simulation. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan; 13:44-49.
Score: 0.183
-
3D treatment planning system-Varian Eclipse for proton therapy planning. Med Dosim. 2018 Summer; 43(2):184-194.
Score: 0.162
-
Quality assurance of proton beams using a multilayer ionization chamber system. Med Phys. 2013 Sep; 40(9):092102.
Score: 0.116
-
Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system. Med Phys. 2013 Apr; 40(4):041723.
Score: 0.113
-
SU-E-T-291: Dosimetry of Double Scattered Proton Beam Fields Used for Cranio-Spinal Irradiation. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part14):3770.
Score: 0.106
-
SU-D-BRCD-01: Evaluation of Zebra Multi-Layer Ionization Chamber System for Patient Treatment Field and Machine QA for Spot Scanning and Passive Scattering Proton Beams. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part3):3613.
Score: 0.106
-
A procedure to determine the planar integral spot dose values of proton pencil beam spots. Med Phys. 2012 Feb; 39(2):891-900.
Score: 0.104
-
Patient-specific quality assurance for prostate cancer patients receiving spot scanning proton therapy using single-field uniform dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Oct 01; 81(2):552-9.
Score: 0.097
-
Verification of patient-specific dose distributions in proton therapy using a commercial two-dimensional ion chamber array. Med Phys. 2010 Nov; 37(11):5831-7.
Score: 0.095
-
Experimental characterization of the low-dose envelope of spot scanning proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jun 21; 55(12):3467-78.
Score: 0.092
-
Intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning using single-field optimization: the impact of monitor unit constraints on plan quality. Med Phys. 2010 Mar; 37(3):1210-9.
Score: 0.091
-
Measurement of neutron dose equivalent and its dependence on beam configuration for a passive scattering proton delivery system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Apr; 76(5):1563-70.
Score: 0.090
-
Commissioning of the discrete spot scanning proton beam delivery system at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Proton Therapy Center, Houston. Med Phys. 2010 Jan; 37(1):154-63.
Score: 0.090
-
Computation of doses for large-angle Coulomb scattering of proton pencil beams. Phys Med Biol. 2009 Dec 21; 54(24):7285-300.
Score: 0.089
-
Comparison of surface doses from spot scanning and passively scattered proton therapy beams. Phys Med Biol. 2009 Jul 21; 54(14):N295-302.
Score: 0.087
-
An overview of the comprehensive proton therapy machine quality assurance procedures implemented at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Proton Therapy Center-Houston. Med Phys. 2009 Jun; 36(6):2269-82.
Score: 0.086
-
LiF TLD-100 as a dosimeter in high energy proton beam therapy--can it yield accurate results? Med Dosim. 2010; 35(1):63-6.
Score: 0.086
-
Use of a two-dimensional ionization chamber array for proton therapy beam quality assurance. Med Phys. 2008 Sep; 35(9):3889-94.
Score: 0.082
-
Statistical evaluation of worst-case robust optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy plans using an exhaustive sampling approach. Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul 19; 14(1):129.
Score: 0.044
-
Proton versus photon radiation-induced cell death in head and neck cancer cells. Head Neck. 2019 01; 41(1):46-55.
Score: 0.042
-
Synchrotron-Based Pencil Beam Scanning Nozzle with an Integrated Mini-Ridge Filter: A Dosimetric Study to Optimize Treatment Delivery. Cancers (Basel). 2017 Dec 13; 9(12).
Score: 0.039
-
Technical Note: Dosimetric characteristics of the ocular beam line and commissioning data for an ocular proton therapy planning system at the Proton Therapy Center Houston. Med Phys. 2017 Dec; 44(12):6661-6671.
Score: 0.039
-
Human papillomavirus status and the relative biological effectiveness of proton radiotherapy in head and neck cancer cells. Head Neck. 2017 04; 39(4):708-715.
Score: 0.037
-
Robust Optimization for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans with Multi-Isocenter Large Fields. Int J Part Ther. 2016; 3(2):305-311.
Score: 0.037
-
Spot scanning proton therapy minimizes neutron dose in the setting of radiation therapy administered during pregnancy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 09 08; 17(5):366-376.
Score: 0.036
-
Proton Beam Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Quality-of-Life Trial. Int J Part Ther. 2016; 3(1):27-36.
Score: 0.036
-
Novel Hybrid Scattering- and Scanning-Beam Proton Therapy Approach. Int J Part Ther. 2016; 3(1):37-50.
Score: 0.036
-
Quantitative analysis of treatment process time and throughput capacity for spot scanning proton therapy. Med Phys. 2016 Jul; 43(7):3975.
Score: 0.035
-
Motion-robust intensity-modulated proton therapy for distal esophageal cancer. Med Phys. 2016 Mar; 43(3):1111-8.
Score: 0.034
-
Selective robust optimization: A new intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization strategy. Med Phys. 2015 Aug; 42(8):4840-7.
Score: 0.033
-
Towards effective and efficient patient-specific quality assurance for spot scanning proton therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2015 Apr 10; 7(2):631-47.
Score: 0.032
-
Clinical implementation of intensity modulated proton therapy for thoracic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 15; 90(4):809-18.
Score: 0.031
-
A single-field integrated boost treatment planning technique for spot scanning proton therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2014 Sep 11; 9:202.
Score: 0.031
-
Evaluation and mitigation of the interplay effects of intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancer in a clinical setting. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Nov-Dec; 4(6):e259-68.
Score: 0.031
-
Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15; 89(4):846-53.
Score: 0.030
-
Relative stopping power measurements to aid in the design of anthropomorphic phantoms for proton radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Mar 06; 15(2):4523.
Score: 0.030
-
On the interplay effects with proton scanning beams in stage III lung cancer. Med Phys. 2014 Feb; 41(2):021721.
Score: 0.030
-
Improving spot-scanning proton therapy patient specific quality assurance with HPlusQA, a second-check dose calculation engine. Med Phys. 2013 Dec; 40(12):121708.
Score: 0.029
-
Quality of life and toxicity from passively scattered and spot-scanning proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Dec 01; 87(5):946-53.
Score: 0.029
-
Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: a treatment planning comparison. Med Dosim. 2013; 38(4):390-4.
Score: 0.029
-
Use of treatment log files in spot scanning proton therapy as part of patient-specific quality assurance. Med Phys. 2013 Feb; 40(2):021703.
Score: 0.028
-
SU-E-T-103: Three-Dimensional Measurements of Dose and LET from a Proton Beam via Polymer Gel Dosimetry. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6Part11):3726.
Score: 0.027
-
Verification of proton range, position, and intensity in IMPT with a 3D liquid scintillator detector system. Med Phys. 2012 Mar; 39(3):1239-46.
Score: 0.026
-
Parameterization of multiple Bragg curves for scanning proton beams using simultaneous fitting of multiple curves. Phys Med Biol. 2011 Dec 21; 56(24):7725-35.
Score: 0.026
-
Quantitative analysis of beam delivery parameters and treatment process time for proton beam therapy. Med Phys. 2011 Jul; 38(7):4329-37.
Score: 0.025
-
A CT-based software tool for evaluating compensator quality in passively scattered proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Nov 21; 55(22):6759-71.
Score: 0.024
-
An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle. Med Phys. 2010 Sep; 37(9):4960-70.
Score: 0.024
-
Energy dependence and dose response of Gafchromic EBT2 film over a wide range of photon, electron, and proton beam energies. Med Phys. 2010 May; 37(5):1942-7.
Score: 0.023
-
Monte Carlo investigation of the low-dose envelope from scanned proton pencil beams. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Feb 07; 55(3):711-21.
Score: 0.023
-
Liquid scintillator for 2D dosimetry for high-energy photon beams. Med Phys. 2009 May; 36(5):1478-85.
Score: 0.021
-
Exploration of the potential of liquid scintillators for real-time 3D dosimetry of intensity modulated proton beams. Med Phys. 2009 May; 36(5):1736-43.
Score: 0.021
-
Assessment of the accuracy of an MCNPX-based Monte Carlo simulation model for predicting three-dimensional absorbed dose distributions. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Aug 21; 53(16):4455-70.
Score: 0.020
-
Incorporating partial shining effects in proton pencil-beam dose calculation. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Feb 07; 53(3):605-16.
Score: 0.020