Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by JEREMY J ERASMUS and GARRETT L WALSH.
Connection Strength

0.740
  1. Imaging of non-small cell lung cancer of the superior sulcus: part 1: anatomy, clinical manifestations, and management. Radiographics. 2008 Mar-Apr; 28(2):551-60; quiz 620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  2. Imaging of non-small cell lung cancer of the superior sulcus: part 2: initial staging and assessment of resectability and therapeutic response. Radiographics. 2008 Mar-Apr; 28(2):561-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  3. Integrated computed tomography-positron emission tomography in patients with potentially resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma: Staging implications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Jun; 129(6):1364-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  4. Gastric Extent of Tumor Predicts Peritoneal Metastasis in Siewert II Adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 02; 117(2):320-326.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  5. Clinical Significance of [18F] Fluoro-2-Deoxy-d-Glucose/Computed Tomographic Avid Hilar Lymph Nodes in Esophageal Carcinoma Patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 10; 114(4):1183-1188.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  6. Endoscopic esophageal tumor length: a prognostic factor for patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer. 2011 Jan 01; 117(1):63-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  7. Surveillance After Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Call for Multidisciplinary Standardization. Innovations (Phila). 2020 Jan/Feb; 15(1):57-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  8. Mediastinal Nodal Involvement After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Siewert II/III Adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 09; 108(3):845-851.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  9. Occult stage IIIA-N2 patients have excellent overall survival with initial surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Dec; 10(12):6670-6676.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  10. Limitations of 18F-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in N1 detection in patients with pathologic stage II-N1 and implications for management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Feb; 99(2):414-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  11. The influence of histopathologic tumor viability on long-term survival and recurrence rates following neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2013 Sep; 258(3):500-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  12. Salvage esophagectomy after failed definitive chemoradiation for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Oct; 94(4):1126-32; discussion 1132-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  13. Improved long-term outcome with chemoradiotherapy strategies in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep; 90(3):892-8; discussion 898-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  14. Non-small cell lung cancer resection in lymphoma patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jul; 90(1):210-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  15. Superior sulcus tumors with vertebral body involvement: a multimodality approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jun; 137(6):1379-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  16. Application of the revised lung cancer staging system (IASLC Staging Project) to a cancer center population. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Aug; 138(2):412-418.e1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  17. Impact of tumor length on long-term survival of pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Oct; 138(4):831-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  18. Extended surgical staging for potentially resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Dec; 80(6):1988-92; discussion 1992-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  19. 2-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography imaging is predictive of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer. 2004 Oct 15; 101(8):1776-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  20. Utility of PET, CT, and EUS to identify pathologic responders in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Oct; 78(4):1152-60; discussion 1152-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.