Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by ELSA ARRIBAS and LUMARIE SANTIAGO.
Connection Strength

2.585
  1. Acceptability of 3D-printed breast models and their impact on the decisional conflict of breast cancer patients: A feasibility study. J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr; 123(5):1206-1214.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.803
  2. The role of three-dimensional printing in the surgical management of breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov; 120(6):897-902.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.725
  3. Multimodality Imaging for 3D Printing and Surgical Rehearsal in Complex Spine Surgery. Radiographics. 2024 Mar; 44(3):e230116.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  4. Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D Printing Special Interest Group (SIG) clinical situations for which 3D printing is considered an appropriate representation or extension of data contained in a medical imaging examination: breast conditions. 3D Print Med. 2023 Mar 23; 9(1):8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  5. Mimickers of breast malignancy: imaging findings, pathologic concordance and clinical management. Insights Imaging. 2021 Apr 20; 12(1):53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  6. Prospective Comparison of Synthesized Mammography with DBT and Full-Field Digital Mammography with DBT Uncovers Recall Disagreements That may Impact Cancer Detection. Acad Radiol. 2022 07; 29(7):1039-1045.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  7. Tumor necrosis by pretreatment breast MRI: association with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) response in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan; 185(1):1-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  8. Axillary ultrasound during neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer patients. Eur J Radiol. 2020 Sep; 130:109170.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  9. Application of Three-Dimensional Printed Vascular Modeling as a Perioperative Guide to Perforator Mapping and Pedicle Dissection during Abdominal Flap Harvest for Breast Reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 Jun; 36(5):325-338.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  10. Imaging features of triple-negative breast cancers according to androgen receptor status. Eur J Radiol. 2019 May; 114:167-174.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  11. A Clinical Feasibility Trial for Identification of Exceptional Responders in Whom Breast Cancer Surgery Can Be Eliminated Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy. Ann Surg. 2018 05; 267(5):946-951.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  12. Biopsy Feasibility Trial for Breast Cancer Pathologic Complete Response Detection after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Imaging Assessment and Correlation Endpoints. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul; 25(7):1953-1960.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  13. Detection of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct; 197(4):W761-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  14. Investigating the limit of detectability of a positron emission mammography device: a phantom study. Med Phys. 2011 Sep; 38(9):5176-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.