Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by FUNDA MERIC-BERNSTAM and JENNIFER LITTON.
Connection Strength

1.901
  1. Phase II trial of AKT inhibitor MK-2206 in patients with advanced breast cancer who have tumors with PIK3CA or AKT mutations, and/or PTEN loss/PTEN mutation. Breast Cancer Res. 2019 07 05; 21(1):78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  2. A Population of Heterogeneous Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts Demonstrate Broad Activity of PARP Inhibitor in BRCA1/2 Wild-Type Tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 01; 23(21):6468-6477.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  3. Active Disclosure of Secondary Germline Findings to Deceased Research Participants' Personal Representatives: Process and Outcomes. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017; 1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  4. Clinical outcomes based on multigene profiling in metastatic breast cancer patients. Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 22; 7(47):76362-76373.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  5. Phase II Randomized Study of Ixabepilone Versus Observation in Patients With Significant Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015 Oct; 15(5):325-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  6. Genotype in BRCA-associated breast cancers. Breast J. 2013 Jan-Feb; 19(1):87-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  7. Triple-negative breast cancer is not a contraindication for breast conservation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct; 18(11):3164-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  8. Earlier age of onset of BRCA mutation-related cancers in subsequent generations. Cancer. 2012 Jan 15; 118(2):321-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  9. Incidence and outcome of BRCA mutations in unselected patients with triple receptor-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Mar 01; 17(5):1082-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  10. Factors affecting the decision of breast cancer patients to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010 Aug; 3(8):1026-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  11. Perception of screening and risk reduction surgeries in patients tested for a BRCA deleterious mutation. Cancer. 2009 Apr 15; 115(8):1598-604.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  12. Comparative Effectiveness of an mTOR-Based Systemic Therapy Regimen in Advanced, Metaplastic and Nonmetaplastic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Oncologist. 2018 11; 23(11):1300-1309.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  13. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway for the Treatment of Mesenchymal Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Evidence From a Phase 1 Trial of mTOR Inhibition in Combination With Liposomal Doxorubicin and Bevacizumab. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr 01; 3(4):509-515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  14. Is the future of personalized therapy in triple-negative breast cancer based on molecular subtype? Oncotarget. 2015 May 30; 6(15):12890-908.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  15. Genotype-Phenotype Correlations by Ethnicity and Mutation Location in BRCA Mutation Carriers. Breast J. 2015 May-Jun; 21(3):260-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  16. Receptor status change from primary to residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and analysis of survival outcomes. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015 Apr; 15(2):153-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  17. PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014 Apr; 2(4):361-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  18. Local-regional control according to surrogate markers of breast cancer subtypes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2012 May 23; 14(3):R83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  19. Biologic features and prognosis of ductal carcinoma in situ are not adversely impacted by initial large body mass. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jun; 133(3):1131-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  20. Response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers: a single-institution experience. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 01; 29(28):3739-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  21. Multidisciplinary considerations in the implementation of the findings from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 study: a practice-changing trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep; 18(9):2407-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  22. Predictive factors for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer. 2012 Mar 15; 118(6):1515-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  23. Outcome of triple-negative breast cancer in patients with or without deleterious BRCA mutations. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Nov; 130(1):145-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  24. Effect of metformin on survival outcomes in diabetic patients with triple receptor-negative breast cancer. Cancer. 2012 Mar 01; 118(5):1202-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  25. Age and survival estimates in patients who have node-negative T1ab breast cancer by breast cancer subtype. Clin Breast Cancer. 2011 Oct; 11(5):325-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  26. Bisphosphonates and pathologic complete response to taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Cancer. 2012 Jan 15; 118(2):326-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  27. Sentinel lymph node dissection is technically feasible in older breast cancer patients. Clin Breast Cancer. 2010 Dec 01; 10(6):477-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  28. High risk of recurrence for patients with breast cancer who have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, node-negative tumors 1 cm or smaller. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 01; 27(34):5700-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  29. The impact of pregnancy on breast cancer outcomes in women View in: PubMed
Score: 0.022
  • Ten-year recurrence rates in young women with breast cancer by locoregional treatment approach. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Mar 01; 73(3):734-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  • Connection Strength

    The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

    Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.