Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by FUNDA MERIC-BERNSTAM and MARK J ROUTBORT.
Connection Strength
2.467
-
Genomic Alterations in DNA Mismatch Repair Genes Across Different Cancer Types. JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Nov; 8:e2400419.
Score: 0.248
-
Targeting ERBB2 (HER2) Amplification Identified by Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Beyond Conventional Indications. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019; 3.
Score: 0.174
-
Correction: A feasibility study of returning clinically actionable somatic genomic alterations identified in a research laboratory. Oncotarget. 2019 Aug 27; 10(50):5254.
Score: 0.173
-
Expanded analysis of secondary germline findings from matched tumor/normal sequencing identifies additional clinically significant mutations. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019; 3.
Score: 0.168
-
Physician interpretation of genomic test results and treatment selection. Cancer. 2018 03 01; 124(5):966-972.
Score: 0.153
-
Clinical Use of Precision Oncology Decision Support. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017; 2017.
Score: 0.151
-
A feasibility study of returning clinically actionable somatic genomic alterations identified in a research laboratory. Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 27; 8(26):41806-41814.
Score: 0.149
-
Incidental germline variants in 1000 advanced cancers on a prospective somatic genomic profiling protocol. Ann Oncol. 2016 05; 27(5):795-800.
Score: 0.134
-
Multigene clinical mutational profiling of breast carcinoma using next-generation sequencing. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015 Nov; 144(5):713-21.
Score: 0.132
-
Clinical next generation sequencing to identify actionable aberrations in a phase I program. Oncotarget. 2015 Aug 21; 6(24):20099-110.
Score: 0.131
-
Feasibility of Large-Scale Genomic Testing to Facilitate Enrollment Onto Genomically Matched Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 01; 33(25):2753-62.
Score: 0.129
-
A decision support framework for genomically informed investigational cancer therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jul; 107(7).
Score: 0.127
-
Hotspot mutation panel testing reveals clonal evolution in a study of 265 paired primary and metastatic tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Jun 01; 21(11):2644-51.
Score: 0.126
-
Implementation of biomarker-driven cancer therapy: existing tools and remaining gaps. Discov Med. 2014 Feb; 17(92):101-14.
Score: 0.117
-
The Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) Trial: Lessons for Genomic Trial Design. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 10 01; 112(10):1021-1029.
Score: 0.047
-
Pan-Cancer Landscape and Analysis of ERBB2 Mutations Identifies Poziotinib as a Clinically Active Inhibitor and Enhancer of T-DM1 Activity. Cancer Cell. 2020 Mar 16; 37(3):420.
Score: 0.045
-
Validation of HER2 Amplification as a Predictive Biomarker for Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Dec; 3:1-13.
Score: 0.044
-
Pan-Cancer Landscape and Analysis of ERBB2 Mutations Identifies Poziotinib as a Clinically Active Inhibitor and Enhancer of T-DM1 Activity. Cancer Cell. 2019 10 14; 36(4):444-457.e7.
Score: 0.043
-
Improving the detection of patients with inherited predispositions to hematologic malignancies using next-generation sequencing-based leukemia prognostication panels. Cancer. 2018 07 01; 124(13):2704-2713.
Score: 0.039
-
Classifying Colorectal Cancer by Tumor Location Rather than Sidedness Highlights a Continuum in Mutation Profiles and Consensus Molecular Subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 03 01; 24(5):1062-1072.
Score: 0.038
-
Association of SMAD4 mutation with patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0173345.
Score: 0.036
-
Clinical actionability enhanced through deep targeted sequencing of solid tumors. Clin Chem. 2015 Mar; 61(3):544-53.
Score: 0.031
-
Beyond BRAF(V600): clinical mutation panel testing by next-generation sequencing in advanced melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Feb; 135(2):508-515.
Score: 0.030