Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by FUNDA MERIC-BERNSTAM and ROSA FRANCES HWANG.
Connection Strength

1.675
  1. To Dissect or Not to Dissect: Can We Predict the Presence of Four or More Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Postmenopausal Women with Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec; 30(13):8327-8334.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  2. OncotypeDX Recurrence Score Does Not Predict Nodal Burden in Clinically Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar; 26(3):815-820.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  3. Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Mastectomy Without Axillary Therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar; 24(3):652-659.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  4. Influence of biospecimen variables on proteomic biomarkers in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jul 15; 20(14):3870-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  5. Impact of internal mammary lymph node drainage identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy on outcomes in patients with stage I to III breast cancer. Cancer. 2012 Dec 15; 118(24):6287-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  6. Incorporation of sentinel lymph node metastasis size into a nomogram predicting nonsentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node. Ann Surg. 2012 Jan; 255(1):109-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  7. Does blue dye contribute to success of sentinel node mapping for breast cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Oct; 17 Suppl 3:280-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  8. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and reduces the need for axillary dissection in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg. 2009 Oct; 250(4):558-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  9. Low locoregional failure rates in selected breast cancer patients with tumor-positive sentinel lymph nodes who do not undergo completion axillary dissection. Cancer. 2007 Aug 15; 110(4):723-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  10. Validation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting nonsentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Mar; 13(3):310-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  11. Clinicopathologic factors predicting involvement of nonsentinel axillary nodes in women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003 Apr; 10(3):248-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  12. Effectiveness and Safety of Magseed-localization for Excision of Breast Lesions: A Prospective, Phase IV Trial. Ann Surg Open. 2020 Dec; 1(2).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  13. Impact of identification of internal mammary sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan; 21(1):60-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  14. Incidence and consequence of close margins in patients with ductal carcinoma-in situ treated with mastectomy: is further therapy warranted? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec; 20(13):4103-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  15. Impact of the american college of surgeons oncology group Z0011 criteria applied to a contemporary patient population. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jan; 216(1):105-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  16. Biology, treatment, and outcome in very young and older women with DCIS. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Nov; 19(12):3777-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  17. Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ after local excision. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 20; 30(6):600-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  18. Prospective evaluation of the nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Apr; 19(4):1137-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  19. Multidisciplinary considerations in the implementation of the findings from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 study: a practice-changing trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep; 18(9):2407-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  20. Classification of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after breast conservation therapy can predict patient prognosis and facilitate treatment planning. Ann Surg. 2011 Mar; 253(3):572-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  21. Sentinel lymph node dissection is technically feasible in older breast cancer patients. Clin Breast Cancer. 2010 Dec 01; 10(6):477-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  22. Trends in and outcomes from sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone vs. SLNB with axillary lymph node dissection for node-positive breast cancer patients: experience from the SEER database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Oct; 17 Suppl 3:343-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  23. Present-day locoregional control in patients with t1 or t2 breast cancer with 0 and 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes after mastectomy without radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Nov; 17(11):2899-908.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  24. A prospective study comparing touch imprint cytology, frozen section analysis, and rapid cytokeratin immunostain for intraoperative evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Cancer. 2009 Apr 01; 115(7):1555-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  25. Predictors of contralateral breast cancer in patients with unilateral breast cancer undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer. 2009 Mar 01; 115(5):962-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  26. How many sentinel lymph nodes are enough during sentinel lymph node dissection for breast cancer? Cancer. 2008 Jul 01; 113(1):30-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  27. Role of primary tumor characteristics in predicting positive sentinel lymph nodes in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or microinvasive breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008 Jul; 196(1):81-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  28. Breast cancer in the very elderly: treatment patterns and complications in a tertiary cancer center. Am J Surg. 2006 Oct; 192(4):541-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.