Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by FUNDA MERIC-BERNSTAM and RUSSELL BROADDUS.
Connection Strength

1.922
  1. Targeting ERBB2 (HER2) Amplification Identified by Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Beyond Conventional Indications. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019; 3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  2. Correction: A feasibility study of returning clinically actionable somatic genomic alterations identified in a research laboratory. Oncotarget. 2019 Aug 27; 10(50):5254.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  3. Use of a Targeted Exome Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Offers Therapeutic Opportunity and Clinical Benefit in a Subset of Patients With Advanced Cancers. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019; 3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  4. Survival Outcomes by TP53 Mutation Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol. 2018; 2018.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  5. Clinical Use of Precision Oncology Decision Support. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017; 2017.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  6. A feasibility study of returning clinically actionable somatic genomic alterations identified in a research laboratory. Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 27; 8(26):41806-41814.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  7. Multigene clinical mutational profiling of breast carcinoma using next-generation sequencing. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015 Nov; 144(5):713-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  8. Clinical next generation sequencing to identify actionable aberrations in a phase I program. Oncotarget. 2015 Aug 21; 6(24):20099-110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  9. Feasibility of Large-Scale Genomic Testing to Facilitate Enrollment Onto Genomically Matched Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 01; 33(25):2753-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  10. A decision support framework for genomically informed investigational cancer therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jul; 107(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  11. A phase II study of MK-2206, an AKT inhibitor, in uterine serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Apr; 40:100974.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  12. Phase II, 2-stage, 2-arm, PIK3CA mutation stratified trial of MK-2206 in recurrent endometrial cancer. Int J Cancer. 2020 07 15; 147(2):413-422.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  13. Clinical and molecular characterization of early-onset colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2019 06 15; 125(12):2002-2010.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  14. Molecular Landscape of ERBB2/ERBB3 Mutated Colorectal Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 12 01; 110(12):1409-1417.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  15. Outcome analysis of Phase I trial patients with metastatic KRAS and/or TP53 mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2018 Sep 07; 9(70):33258-33270.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  16. Classifying Colorectal Cancer by Tumor Location Rather than Sidedness Highlights a Continuum in Mutation Profiles and Consensus Molecular Subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 03 01; 24(5):1062-1072.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  17. Initiative for Molecular Profiling and Advanced Cancer Therapy (IMPACT): An MD Anderson Precision Medicine Study. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017; 2017.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  18. Antiangiogenesis and gene aberration-related therapy may improve overall survival in patients with concurrent KRAS and TP53 hotspot mutant cancer. Oncotarget. 2017 May 16; 8(20):33796-33806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  19. Hotspot mutation panel testing reveals clonal evolution in a study of 265 paired primary and metastatic tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Jun 01; 21(11):2644-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  20. Beyond BRAF(V600): clinical mutation panel testing by next-generation sequencing in advanced melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Feb; 135(2):508-515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  21. Functional proteomics can define prognosis and predict pathologic complete response in patients with breast cancer. Clin Proteomics. 2011 Jul 08; 8(1):11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.