Connection

LOIS M RAMONDETTA to Neoplasm Staging

This is a "connection" page, showing publications LOIS M RAMONDETTA has written about Neoplasm Staging.
Connection Strength

0.492
  1. Accuracy of Intraoperative Frozen Section Diagnosis of Borderline Ovarian Tumors by Hospital Type. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 01; 26(1):87-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  2. Avoidable tragedies: Disparities in healthcare access among medically underserved women diagnosed with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Dec; 139(3):500-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  3. A phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin in women with advanced or recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Apr; 21(3):517-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  4. Lymphadenectomy during endometrial cancer staging: practice patterns among gynecologic oncologists. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Nov; 119(2):291-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  5. Eleven years: the long and winding road. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Nov; 107(2):166-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  6. Clinical challenges presented by three simultaneous solid tumors. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Dec; 103(3):1159-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  7. Advanced cervical cancer treatment in Harris County: pilot evaluation of factors that prevent optimal therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Nov; 103(2):547-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  8. Practice patterns of SGO members for stage IIIA endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Jul; 98(1):77-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  9. Heterogeneity of stage IIIA endometrial carcinomas: implications for adjuvant therapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005 May-Jun; 15(3):510-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  10. Treatment of uterine papillary serous carcinoma with paclitaxel. Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Jul; 82(1):156-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  11. Prospective phase II trial of levonorgestrel intrauterine device: nonsurgical approach for complex atypical hyperplasia and early-stage endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 02; 224(2):191.e1-191.e15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  12. Gut microbial diversity and genus-level differences identified in cervical cancer patients versus healthy controls. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 11; 155(2):237-244.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  13. Prognostic factors impacting survival in early stage uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 01; 152(1):31-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  14. A comparative analysis of Ki-67, p53, and p21WAF1CIP1 expression in tamoxifen associated endometrial carcinomas. Anticancer Res. 1998 Nov-Dec; 18(6B):4661-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  15. Complete Resection Is Essential in the Surgical Treatment of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 10; 28(8):1453-1460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  16. Role of Radiation Therapy in the Multidisciplinary Management of Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 01; 28(1):114-121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  17. Treatment of Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer and Complex Atypical Hyperplasia With the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 01; 131(1):109-116.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  18. Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and Costs for Bowel Obstruction in Ovarian Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 09; 27(7):1350-1359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  19. Survival of patients with metastatic leiomyosarcoma: the MD Anderson Clinical Center for targeted therapy experience. Cancer Med. 2016 12; 5(12):3437-3444.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  20. Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: patient-reported outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial (NRG Oncology-Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 240). Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar; 16(3):301-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  21. Patient preferences for side effects associated with cervical cancer treatment. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Jul; 24(6):1077-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  22. Use of social media to conduct a cross-sectional epidemiologic and quality of life survey of patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: a feasibility study. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan; 132(1):149-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  23. A prospective phase II study of chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for FIGO stage I-IIIA (1988) uterine papillary serous carcinoma of the endometrium. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 May; 129(2):304-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  24. Anatomic location of PET-positive aortocaval nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: implications for surgical staging. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Sep; 22(7):1203-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  25. Rate of para-aortic lymph node micrometastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Dec; 119(3):422-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  26. Phase III trial of four cisplatin-containing doublet combinations in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 01; 27(28):4649-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  27. Node-positive adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: outcome and patterns of recurrence with and without external beam irradiation. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Oct; 115(1):6-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  28. Radiation-associated endometrial cancers are prognostically unfavorable tumors: a clinicopathologic comparison with 527 sporadic endometrial cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Dec; 103(3):948-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  29. The activity of taxanes compared with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin in the treatment of sex cord-stromal ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol. 2005 May; 97(2):489-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  30. Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC): a single institution review of 129 cases. Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Dec; 91(3):463-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.