Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by WAYNE L HOFSTETTER and MARIELA BLUM MURPHY.
WAYNE L HOFSTETTER
Connection Strength
0.904
MARIELA BLUM MURPHY
  1. Pathological complete response in patients with esophageal cancer after the trimodality approach: The association with baseline variables and survival-The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2017 Nov 01; 123(21):4106-4113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  2. Localized Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma in the Elderly: Is Age a Factor Associated with Suboptimal Treatment? Oncology. 2023; 101(3):153-158.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  3. Frequency and Implications of Paratracheal Lymph Node Metastases in Resectable Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2021 04 01; 273(4):751-757.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  4. Total Lesion Glycolysis Assessment Identifies a Patient Fraction With a High Cure Rate Among Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation. Ann Surg. 2020 08; 272(2):311-318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  5. Barrett's Esophagus after Bimodality Therapy in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Oncology. 2018; 95(2):81-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  6. Early Metabolic Change after Induction Chemotherapy Predicts Histologic Response and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Target Oncol. 2018 02; 13(1):99-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  7. 101 Long-Term Survivors Who Had Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancer and Received Local Consolidative Therapy. Oncology. 2017; 93(4):243-248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  8. The impact of histology on recurrence patterns in esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2017 08; 124(2):318-324.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  9. Geographic distribution of regional metastatic nodes affects the outcome of trimodality-eligible patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Oncology. 2015; 88(6):332-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  10. Importance of surveillance and success of salvage strategies after definitive chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 20; 32(30):3400-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  11. Post-chemoradiation surgical pathology stage can customize the surveillance strategy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Aug; 12(8):1139-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  12. Distribution and timing of distant metastasis after local therapy in a large cohort of patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer. Oncology. 2014; 86(5-6):336-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  13. Factors associated with local-regional failure after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan; 21(1):306-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  14. Locoregional failure rate after preoperative chemoradiation of esophageal adenocarcinoma and the outcomes of salvage strategies. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 01; 31(34):4306-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  15. Incidence of brain metastases after trimodality therapy in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer: implications for screening and surveillance. Oncology. 2013; 85(4):204-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  16. The influence of histopathologic tumor viability on long-term survival and recurrence rates following neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2013 Sep; 258(3):500-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  17. Results of the baseline positron emission tomography can customize therapy of localized esophageal adenocarcinoma patients who achieve a clinical complete response after chemoradiation. Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov; 24(11):2854-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  18. Propensity-based matching between esophagogastric cancer patients who had surgery and who declined surgery after preoperative chemoradiation. Oncology. 2013; 85(2):95-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  19. Association between clinical complete response and pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with gastroesophageal cancer: analysis in a large cohort. Ann Oncol. 2013 May; 24(5):1262-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  20. Outcome of trimodality-eligible esophagogastric cancer patients who declined surgery after preoperative chemoradiation. Oncology. 2012; 83(5):300-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  21. A nomogram associated with high probability of malignant nodes in the surgical specimen after trimodality therapy of patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Dec; 48(18):3396-404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  22. Clinical parameters model for predicting pathologic complete response following preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct; 23(10):2638-2642.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  23. Nomograms for prognostication of outcome in patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal carcinoma undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy. Oncology. 2012; 82(2):108-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  24. Celebrate or calibrate? We say calibrate. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 01; 29(19):2732; author reply 2732-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.