Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by WAYNE L HOFSTETTER and STEVEN HSESHENG LIN.
WAYNE L HOFSTETTER
Connection Strength
5.062
STEVEN HSESHENG LIN
  1. Comparing 90-Day Postoperative Mortality After Neoadjuvant Proton-Based Versus Photon-Based Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer. Int J Part Ther. 2024 Mar; 11:100012.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.247
  2. Esophageal Cancer Outcomes After Definitive Chemotherapy With Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy. Int J Part Ther. 2024 Mar; 11:100009.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.247
  3. Prolonged neutrophilia is associated with worse outcomes after Esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2022 Apr 19; 35(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.215
  4. Cancer associated macrophage-like cells and prognosis of esophageal cancer after chemoradiation therapy. J Transl Med. 2020 11 04; 18(1):413.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.194
  5. Modified En Bloc Esophagectomy Compared With Standard Resection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 04; 111(4):1133-1140.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  6. Randomized Phase IIB Trial of Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 05 10; 38(14):1569-1579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  7. Multi-institutional Analysis of Recurrence and Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy of Esophageal Cancer: Impact of Histology on Recurrence Patterns and Outcomes. Ann Surg. 2019 04; 269(4):663-670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  8. Recurrence Risk Stratification After Preoperative Chemoradiation of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2018 08; 268(2):289-295.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  9. Validation of a Nomogram Predicting Survival After Trimodality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 11; 106(5):1541-1547.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  10. Prediction and diagnosis of interval metastasis after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer using 18F-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 09; 45(10):1742-1751.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  11. Preoperative Nomogram to Risk Stratify Patients for the Benefit of Trimodality Therapy in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun; 25(6):1598-1607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  12. Severe lymphopenia during neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: A propensity matched analysis of the relative risk of proton versus photon-based radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018 07; 128(1):154-160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  13. The impact of histology on recurrence patterns in esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2017 08; 124(2):318-324.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  14. Comparative Outcomes After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Using Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Institutional Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 11 01; 99(3):667-676.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  15. 18F-FDG PET Response After Induction Chemotherapy Can Predict Who Will Benefit from Subsequent Esophagectomy After Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2017 11; 58(11):1756-1763.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  16. Patterns of Care and Treatment Outcomes of Elderly?Patients with Stage I Esophageal Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 07; 12(7):1152-1160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  17. Long-term survival and toxicity outcomes of intensity modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of esophageal cancer: A large single-institutional cohort study. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jul-Sep; 2(3):316-324.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  18. A Prognostic Scoring Model for the Utility of Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 06; 12(6):1001-1010.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  19. The value of 18F-FDG PET before and after induction chemotherapy for the early prediction of a poor pathologic response to subsequent preoperative chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 01; 44(1):71-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  20. The Incremental Value of Subjective and Quantitative Assessment of 18F-FDG PET for the Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016 05; 57(5):691-700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  21. Radiation modality use and cardiopulmonary mortality risk in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer. 2016 Mar 15; 122(6):917-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  22. Impact of comorbidities and use of common medications on cancer and non-cancer specific survival in esophageal carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2015; 15:1095.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  23. A nomogram that predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation also predicts survival outcomes after definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Feb; 6(1):45-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  24. Predictors of postoperative complications after trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Aug 01; 86(5):885-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  25. Obesity and outcomes in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2014 Feb-Mar; 27(2):168-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  26. Propensity score-based comparison of long-term outcomes with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Dec 01; 84(5):1078-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  27. Proton beam therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 01; 83(3):e345-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  28. Author Correction: Plasmonic nano-aperture label-free imaging of single small extracellular vesicles for cancer detection. Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Jun 28; 4(1):126.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  29. Plasmonic nano-aperture label-free imaging of single small extracellular vesicles for cancer detection. Commun Med (Lond). 2024 May 25; 4(1):100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  30. Salvage Esophagectomy Definition Influences Comparative Outcomes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancers. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 12; 114(6):2032-2040.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  31. Esophageal adenocarcinoma with any component of signet ring cells portends poor prognosis and response to neoadjuvant therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Nov; 162(5):1404-1412.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  32. A novel patient-derived orthotopic xenograft model of esophageal adenocarcinoma provides a platform for translational discoveries. Dis Model Mech. 2019 12 17; 12(12).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  33. Targeting CDK9 and MCL-1 by a new CDK9/p-TEFb inhibitor with and without 5-fluorouracil in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019; 11:1758835919864850.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  34. Targeting cyclin-dependent kinase 9 by a novel inhibitor enhances radiosensitization and identifies Axl as a novel downstream target in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2019 Jul 23; 10(45):4703-4718.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  35. Pathological complete response in patients with esophageal cancer after the trimodality approach: The association with baseline variables and survival-The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2017 Nov 01; 123(21):4106-4113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  36. Antitumor effects of cyclin dependent kinase 9 inhibition in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 25; 8(17):28696-28710.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  37. Factors Predictive of Improved Outcomes With Multimodality Local Therapy After Palliative Chemotherapy for Stage IV Esophageal Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 06; 39(3):228-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  38. Signet ring cells in esophageal adenocarcinoma predict poor response to preoperative chemoradiation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Sep; 98(3):1064-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  39. Influence of preoperative radiation field on postoperative leak rates in esophageal cancer patients after trimodality therapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Apr; 9(4):534-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  40. Association between clinical complete response and pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with gastroesophageal cancer: analysis in a large cohort. Ann Oncol. 2013 May; 24(5):1262-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  41. Metformin use and improved response to therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Acta Oncol. 2013 Jun; 52(5):1002-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  42. Outcome of trimodality-eligible esophagogastric cancer patients who declined surgery after preoperative chemoradiation. Oncology. 2012; 83(5):300-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  43. A nomogram associated with high probability of malignant nodes in the surgical specimen after trimodality therapy of patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Dec; 48(18):3396-404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  44. Clinical parameters model for predicting pathologic complete response following preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct; 23(10):2638-2642.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  45. Nomograms for prognostication of outcome in patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal carcinoma undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy. Oncology. 2012; 82(2):108-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  46. Patients with high body mass index tend to have lower stage of esophageal carcinoma at diagnosis. Dis Esophagus. 2012 Sep-Oct; 25(7):614-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  47. Prognostic significance of baseline positron emission tomography and importance of clinical complete response in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Cancer. 2011 Nov 01; 117(21):4823-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.