Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by WAYNE L HOFSTETTER and RITSUKO KOMAKI.
WAYNE L HOFSTETTER
Connection Strength
2.384
RITSUKO KOMAKI
  1. Local Control and Toxicity of a Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Dose Escalation in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: Interim Results from a Prospective Phase I/II Trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 02; 12(2):375-382.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  2. Surgery is an essential component of multimodality therapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Aug; 17(8):1359-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  3. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer. Lancet. 2012 Sep 08; 380(9845):883; author reply 885-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  4. Esophageal cancer dose escalation using a simultaneous integrated boost technique. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 01; 82(1):468-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  5. Retrospective study of clinicopathologic features and prognosis of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 Sep; 32(9):1404-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  6. Proposed modification of nodal status in AJCC esophageal cancer staging system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Aug; 84(2):365-73; discussion 374-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  7. Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2002 Sep; 236(3):376-84; discussion 384-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  8. Cancer associated macrophage-like cells and prognosis of esophageal cancer after chemoradiation therapy. J Transl Med. 2020 11 04; 18(1):413.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  9. Endoscopic esophageal tumor length: a prognostic factor for patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer. 2011 Jan 01; 117(1):63-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  10. Randomized Phase IIB Trial of Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 05 10; 38(14):1569-1579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  11. Recurrence Risk Stratification After Preoperative Chemoradiation of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2018 08; 268(2):289-295.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  12. Actionable Locoregional Relapses after Therapy of Localized Esophageal Cancer: Insights from a Large Cohort. Oncology. 2018; 94(6):345-353.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  13. Early Metabolic Change after Induction Chemotherapy Predicts Histologic Response and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Target Oncol. 2018 02; 13(1):99-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  14. Severe lymphopenia during neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: A propensity matched analysis of the relative risk of proton versus photon-based radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018 07; 128(1):154-160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  15. Influence of induction chemotherapy in trimodality therapy-eligible oesophageal cancer patients: secondary analysis of a randomised trial. Br J Cancer. 2018 02 06; 118(3):331-337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  16. Pathological complete response in patients with esophageal cancer after the trimodality approach: The association with baseline variables and survival-The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2017 Nov 01; 123(21):4106-4113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  17. The impact of histology on recurrence patterns in esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2017 08; 124(2):318-324.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  18. Comparative Outcomes After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Using Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Institutional Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 11 01; 99(3):667-676.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  19. 18F-FDG PET Response After Induction Chemotherapy Can Predict Who Will Benefit from Subsequent Esophagectomy After Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2017 11; 58(11):1756-1763.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  20. Long-term survival and toxicity outcomes of intensity modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of esophageal cancer: A large single-institutional cohort study. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jul-Sep; 2(3):316-324.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  21. A Prognostic Scoring Model for the Utility of Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 06; 12(6):1001-1010.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  22. Final Results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0246: An?Organ-Preserving Selective Resection Strategy in?Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive?Chemoradiation. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 02; 12(2):368-374.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  23. Factors Predictive of Improved Outcomes With Multimodality Local Therapy After Palliative Chemotherapy for Stage IV Esophageal Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 06; 39(3):228-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  24. A Nomogram to Predict Distant Metastases After Multimodality Therapy for Patients With Localized Esophageal Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 02; 14(2):173-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  25. Radiation modality use and cardiopulmonary mortality risk in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer. 2016 Mar 15; 122(6):917-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  26. Impact of comorbidities and use of common medications on cancer and non-cancer specific survival in esophageal carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2015; 15:1095.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  27. Distribution of Resistant Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the Resected Specimens of Clinical Stage III Patients after Chemoradiation: Its Clinical Implications. Oncology. 2015; 89(2):65-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  28. Geographic distribution of regional metastatic nodes affects the outcome of trimodality-eligible patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Oncology. 2015; 88(6):332-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  29. Importance of surveillance and success of salvage strategies after definitive chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 20; 32(30):3400-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  30. A validated miRNA profile predicts response to therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2014 Dec 01; 120(23):3635-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  31. Post-chemoradiation surgical pathology stage can customize the surveillance strategy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Aug; 12(8):1139-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  32. Clinical staging of patients with early esophageal adenocarcinoma: does FDG-PET/CT have a role? J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Aug; 9(8):1202-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  33. Influence of preoperative radiation field on postoperative leak rates in esophageal cancer patients after trimodality therapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Apr; 9(4):534-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  34. Factors associated with local-regional failure after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan; 21(1):306-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  35. Locoregional failure rate after preoperative chemoradiation of esophageal adenocarcinoma and the outcomes of salvage strategies. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 01; 31(34):4306-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  36. Incidence of brain metastases after trimodality therapy in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer: implications for screening and surveillance. Oncology. 2013; 85(4):204-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  37. Predictors of postoperative complications after trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Aug 01; 86(5):885-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  38. Propensity-based matching between esophagogastric cancer patients who had surgery and who declined surgery after preoperative chemoradiation. Oncology. 2013; 85(2):95-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  39. Metformin use and improved response to therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Acta Oncol. 2013 Jun; 52(5):1002-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  40. Propensity score-based comparison of long-term outcomes with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Dec 01; 84(5):1078-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  41. Celiac node failure patterns after definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer in the modern era. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jun 01; 83(2):e231-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  42. Proton beam therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 01; 83(3):e345-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  43. Failure patterns in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation. Cancer. 2012 May 15; 118(10):2632-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  44. Computed tomography findings predicting invasiveness of thymoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Jul; 6(7):1274-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  45. Update: modern approaches to the treatment of localized esophageal cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2011 Jun; 13(3):157-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  46. A Phase II study of a paclitaxel-based chemoradiation regimen with selective surgical salvage for resectable locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer: initial reporting of RTOG 0246. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 01; 82(5):1967-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  47. Intensity-modulated proton therapy further reduces normal tissue exposure during definitive therapy for locally advanced distal esophageal tumors: a dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Dec 01; 81(5):1336-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  48. Combined modality therapy of cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer: the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2011 Mar 01; 117(5):925-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  49. Improved long-term outcome with chemoradiotherapy strategies in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep; 90(3):892-8; discussion 898-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  50. Trimodality therapy without a platinum compound for localized carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Cancer. 2010 Apr 01; 116(7):1656-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  51. Influence of age on choice of therapy and surgical outcomes in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. Am Surg. 2009 Jul; 75(7):598-603; discussion 603-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  52. Outcomes with esophageal cancer radiation therapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2009 Jul; 4(7):880-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  53. Superior sulcus tumors with vertebral body involvement: a multimodality approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jun; 137(6):1379-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  54. Application of the revised lung cancer staging system (IASLC Staging Project) to a cancer center population. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Aug; 138(2):412-418.e1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  55. Impact of tumor length on long-term survival of pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Oct; 138(4):831-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  56. Frequent loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 1q in esophageal adenocarcinoma: loss of chromosome 1q21.3 is associated with shorter overall survival. Cancer. 2009 Apr 01; 115(7):1576-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  57. Patterns of care and locoregional treatment outcomes in older esophageal cancer patients: The SEER-Medicare Cohort. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jun 01; 74(2):482-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  58. Influence of the baseline 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography results on survival and pathologic response in patients with gastroesophageal cancer undergoing chemoradiation. Cancer. 2009 Feb 01; 115(3):624-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  59. Comment on "Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer stage IIIA: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition)". Chest. 2008 Dec; 134(6):1349.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  60. Comparison of limited surgery and three-dimensional conformal radiation in high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007 Nov; 2(11):1022-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  61. Detection of interval distant metastases: clinical utility of integrated CT-PET imaging in patients with esophageal carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy. Cancer. 2007 Jan 01; 109(1):125-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  62. The addition of induction chemotherapy to preoperative, concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves tumor response in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2006 Sep 01; 107(5):967-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  63. Preoperative chemo-radiation-induced ulceration in patients with esophageal cancer: a confounding factor in tumor response assessment in integrated computed tomographic-positron emission tomographic imaging. J Thorac Oncol. 2006 Jun; 1(5):478-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  64. The number of lymph nodes with metastasis predicts survival in patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma who receive preoperative chemoradiation. Cancer. 2006 Mar 01; 106(5):1017-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  65. Endoscopic ultrasonography-identified celiac adenopathy remains a poor prognostic factor despite preoperative chemoradiotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Jan; 131(1):65-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  66. The evolution of treatment outcomes for resected stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer over 16 years at a single institution. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Dec; 130(6):1601-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  67. Proposed revision of the esophageal cancer staging system to accommodate pathologic response (pP) following preoperative chemoradiation (CRT). Ann Surg. 2005 May; 241(5):810-7; discussion 817-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.