Header Logo

Connection

WAYNE L HOFSTETTER to Chemoradiotherapy

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications WAYNE L HOFSTETTER has written about Chemoradiotherapy.
WAYNE L HOFSTETTER
Connection Strength
3.384
Chemoradiotherapy
  1. Morbidity following salvage esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: the MD Anderson experience. Dis Esophagus. 2020 Mar 16; 33(3).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.387
  2. Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Active Surveillance Versus Standard Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2022 03 01; 275(3):467-476.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  3. Bayesian post-hoc analysis of chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 09; 164(3):688-693.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  4. Modified En Bloc Esophagectomy Compared With Standard Resection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 04; 111(4):1133-1140.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  5. Total Lesion Glycolysis Assessment Identifies a Patient Fraction With a High Cure Rate Among Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation. Ann Surg. 2020 08; 272(2):311-318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  6. Taxane-based or platinum-based combination chemotherapy given concurrently with radiation followed by surgery resulting in high cure rates in esophageal cancer patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb; 99(9):e19295.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  7. Commentary: Delayed resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 06; 159(6):2568-2569.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  8. Results of a Phase 1/2 Trial of Chemoradiotherapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Radiotherapy Dose in Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2019 11 01; 5(11):1597-1604.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  9. Multi-institutional Analysis of Recurrence and Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy of Esophageal Cancer: Impact of Histology on Recurrence Patterns and Outcomes. Ann Surg. 2019 04; 269(4):663-670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  10. Validation of a Nomogram Predicting Survival After Trimodality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 11; 106(5):1541-1547.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  11. Barrett's Esophagus after Bimodality Therapy in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Oncology. 2018; 95(2):81-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  12. Nodal Downstaging in Gastric Cancer Patients: Promising Survival if ypN0 is Achieved. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul; 25(7):2012-2017.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  13. Prediction and diagnosis of interval metastasis after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer using 18F-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 09; 45(10):1742-1751.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  14. Severe lymphopenia during neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: A propensity matched analysis of the relative risk of proton versus photon-based radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018 07; 128(1):154-160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  15. Comparative Outcomes After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Using Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Institutional Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 11 01; 99(3):667-676.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  16. Patterns of Care and Treatment Outcomes of Elderly?Patients with Stage I Esophageal Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 07; 12(7):1152-1160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  17. A Prognostic Scoring Model for the Utility of Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 06; 12(6):1001-1010.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  18. Local Control and Toxicity of a Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Dose Escalation in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: Interim Results from a Prospective Phase I/II Trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 02; 12(2):375-382.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  19. Co-morbidities Rather than Age Impact Outcomes in Patients Receiving Preoperative Therapy for Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug; 24(8):2291-2301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  20. Final Results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0246: An?Organ-Preserving Selective Resection Strategy in?Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive?Chemoradiation. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 02; 12(2):368-374.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  21. Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy Versus Chemotherapy in Patients Undergoing Modified En Bloc Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Is Radiotherapy Beneficial? Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr; 101(4):1262-9; discussion 1969-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  22. The Incremental Value of Subjective and Quantitative Assessment of 18F-FDG PET for the Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016 05; 57(5):691-700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  23. Importance of surveillance and success of salvage strategies after definitive chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 20; 32(30):3400-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  24. Signet ring cells in esophageal adenocarcinoma predict poor response to preoperative chemoradiation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Sep; 98(3):1064-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  25. Factors associated with local-regional failure after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan; 21(1):306-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  26. Results of the baseline positron emission tomography can customize therapy of localized esophageal adenocarcinoma patients who achieve a clinical complete response after chemoradiation. Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov; 24(11):2854-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  27. A phase II randomized trial of induction chemotherapy versus no induction chemotherapy followed by preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov; 24(11):2844-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  28. Obesity and outcomes in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2014 Feb-Mar; 27(2):168-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  29. Association between clinical complete response and pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with gastroesophageal cancer: analysis in a large cohort. Ann Oncol. 2013 May; 24(5):1262-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  30. Metformin use and improved response to therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Acta Oncol. 2013 Jun; 52(5):1002-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  31. Celiac node failure patterns after definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer in the modern era. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jun 01; 83(2):e231-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  32. Proton beam therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 01; 83(3):e345-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  33. Nomograms for prognostication of outcome in patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal carcinoma undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy. Oncology. 2012; 82(2):108-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  34. Failure patterns in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation. Cancer. 2012 May 15; 118(10):2632-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  35. A Phase II study of a paclitaxel-based chemoradiation regimen with selective surgical salvage for resectable locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer: initial reporting of RTOG 0246. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 01; 82(5):1967-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  36. Delayed Surgical Intervention After Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer: (DICE) Study. Ann Surg. 2023 11 01; 278(5):701-708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  37. An International Cohort Study of Prognosis Associated With Pathologically Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy of Surgical Treated Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2022 11 01; 276(5):799-805.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  38. Can Clinical Response Predict Pathologic Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Cancer? J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 07; 26(7):1345-1351.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  39. Salvage Esophagectomy Definition Influences Comparative Outcomes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancers. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 12; 114(6):2032-2040.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  40. Cancer associated macrophage-like cells and prognosis of esophageal cancer after chemoradiation therapy. J Transl Med. 2020 11 04; 18(1):413.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  41. Pathological complete response in patients with esophageal cancer after the trimodality approach: The association with baseline variables and survival-The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2017 Nov 01; 123(21):4106-4113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  42. The impact of histology on recurrence patterns in esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2017 08; 124(2):318-324.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  43. 18F-FDG PET Response After Induction Chemotherapy Can Predict Who Will Benefit from Subsequent Esophagectomy After Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2017 11; 58(11):1756-1763.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  44. Factors Predictive of Improved Outcomes With Multimodality Local Therapy After Palliative Chemotherapy for Stage IV Esophageal Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 06; 39(3):228-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  45. 18-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission computed tomography as predictive of response after chemoradiation in oesophageal cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov; 51(17):2545-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  46. Impact of comorbidities and use of common medications on cancer and non-cancer specific survival in esophageal carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2015; 15:1095.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  47. Distribution of Resistant Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the Resected Specimens of Clinical Stage III Patients after Chemoradiation: Its Clinical Implications. Oncology. 2015; 89(2):65-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  48. Geographic distribution of regional metastatic nodes affects the outcome of trimodality-eligible patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Oncology. 2015; 88(6):332-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  49. A validated miRNA profile predicts response to therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2014 Dec 01; 120(23):3635-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  50. ALDH-1 expression levels predict response or resistance to preoperative chemoradiation in resectable esophageal cancer patients. Mol Oncol. 2014 Feb; 8(1):142-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  51. Incidence of brain metastases after trimodality therapy in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer: implications for screening and surveillance. Oncology. 2013; 85(4):204-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  52. Utilization of surgery in trimodality-eligible patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma in a nonprotocol setting. Dis Esophagus. 2013 Sep-Oct; 26(7):708-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  53. Outcome of trimodality-eligible esophagogastric cancer patients who declined surgery after preoperative chemoradiation. Oncology. 2012; 83(5):300-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  54. Salvage esophagectomy after failed definitive chemoradiation for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Oct; 94(4):1126-32; discussion 1132-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  55. A nomogram associated with high probability of malignant nodes in the surgical specimen after trimodality therapy of patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Dec; 48(18):3396-404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  56. Prognostic significance of baseline positron emission tomography and importance of clinical complete response in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Cancer. 2011 Nov 01; 117(21):4823-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.