Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by XIAORONG RONALD ZHU and HENG LI.
Connection Strength
4.485
-
Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2015 Mar; 114(3):367-72.
Score: 0.509
-
Evaluation of the systematic error in using 3D dose calculation in scanning beam proton therapy for lung cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Sep 08; 15(5):4810.
Score: 0.494
-
Patient-specific quantification of respiratory motion-induced dose uncertainty for step-and-shoot IMRT of lung cancer. Med Phys. 2013 Dec; 40(12):121712.
Score: 0.468
-
Use of treatment log files in spot scanning proton therapy as part of patient-specific quality assurance. Med Phys. 2013 Feb; 40(2):021703.
Score: 0.442
-
Dynamically accumulated dose and 4D accumulated dose for moving tumors. Med Phys. 2012 Dec; 39(12):7359-67.
Score: 0.437
-
Toward a better understanding of the gamma index: Investigation of parameters with a surface-based distance method. Med Phys. 2011 Dec; 38(12):6730-41.
Score: 0.407
-
A CT-based software tool for evaluating compensator quality in passively scattered proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Nov 21; 55(22):6759-71.
Score: 0.378
-
Scatter kernel estimation with an edge-spread function method for cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Dec 07; 53(23):6729-48.
Score: 0.329
-
Reducing Dose Uncertainty for Spot-Scanning Proton Beam Therapy of Moving Tumors by Optimizing the Spot Delivery Sequence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Nov 01; 93(3):547-56.
Score: 0.130
-
A single-field integrated boost treatment planning technique for spot scanning proton therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2014 Sep 11; 9:202.
Score: 0.123
-
Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system. Med Phys. 2013 Apr; 40(4):041723.
Score: 0.112
-
Characterization of dose impact on IMRT and VMAT from couch attenuation for two Varian couches. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011 Mar 02; 12(3):3471.
Score: 0.097
-
Intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning using single-field optimization: the impact of monitor unit constraints on plan quality. Med Phys. 2010 Mar; 37(3):1210-9.
Score: 0.090
-
Blind deblurring reconstruction technique with applications in PET imaging. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2009; 2009:718157.
Score: 0.086
-
Comparison of 2D radiographic images and 3D cone beam computed tomography for positioning head-and-neck radiotherapy patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jul 01; 71(3):916-25.
Score: 0.079
-
Selective robust optimization: A new intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization strategy. Med Phys. 2015 Aug; 42(8):4840-7.
Score: 0.033
-
Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2014 Nov 07; 59(21):6341-54.
Score: 0.031
-
Is there a clinical benefit with a smooth compensator design compared with a plunged compensator design for passive scattered protons? Med Dosim. 2015; 40(1):37-43.
Score: 0.031
-
Clinical implementation of intensity modulated proton therapy for thoracic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 15; 90(4):809-18.
Score: 0.031
-
Impact of respiratory motion on worst-case scenario optimized intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancers. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 Mar-Apr; 5(2):e77-86.
Score: 0.031
-
Evaluation and mitigation of the interplay effects of intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancer in a clinical setting. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Nov-Dec; 4(6):e259-68.
Score: 0.031
-
On the interplay effects with proton scanning beams in stage III lung cancer. Med Phys. 2014 Feb; 41(2):021721.
Score: 0.030
-
Dosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Nov-Dec; 4(6):384-91.
Score: 0.029
-
Improving spot-scanning proton therapy patient specific quality assurance with HPlusQA, a second-check dose calculation engine. Med Phys. 2013 Dec; 40(12):121708.
Score: 0.029
-
Statistical assessment of proton treatment plans under setup and range uncertainties. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Aug 01; 86(5):1007-13.
Score: 0.028