XIAORONG RONALD ZHU to Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
This is a "connection" page, showing publications XIAORONG RONALD ZHU has written about Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted.
Connection Strength
4.987
-
3D treatment planning system-Varian Eclipse for proton therapy planning. Med Dosim. 2018 Summer; 43(2):184-194.
Score: 0.313
-
Technical Note: Dosimetric characteristics of the ocular beam line and commissioning data for an ocular proton therapy planning system at the Proton Therapy Center Houston. Med Phys. 2017 Dec; 44(12):6661-6671.
Score: 0.299
-
A single-field integrated boost treatment planning technique for spot scanning proton therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2014 Sep 11; 9:202.
Score: 0.241
-
Evaluation of the systematic error in using 3D dose calculation in scanning beam proton therapy for lung cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Sep 08; 15(5):4810.
Score: 0.241
-
Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system. Med Phys. 2013 Apr; 40(4):041723.
Score: 0.218
-
Dynamically accumulated dose and 4D accumulated dose for moving tumors. Med Phys. 2012 Dec; 39(12):7359-67.
Score: 0.213
-
Uncertainty incorporated beam angle optimization for IMPT treatment planning. Med Phys. 2012 Aug; 39(8):5248-56.
Score: 0.208
-
Patient-specific quality assurance for prostate cancer patients receiving spot scanning proton therapy using single-field uniform dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Oct 01; 81(2):552-9.
Score: 0.188
-
Intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning using single-field optimization: the impact of monitor unit constraints on plan quality. Med Phys. 2010 Mar; 37(3):1210-9.
Score: 0.176
-
Treatment planning system evaluation for mesothelioma IMRT. Lung Cancer. 2005 Jul; 49 Suppl 1:S75-81.
Score: 0.127
-
Planning quality and delivery efficiency of sMLC delivered IMRT treatment of oropharyngeal cancers evaluated by RTOG H-0022 dosimetric criteria. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2004; 5(4):80-95.
Score: 0.121
-
Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers. Med Phys. 2013 May; 40(5):051711.
Score: 0.109
-
Intensity modulated proton arc therapy via geometry-based energy selection for ependymoma. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Jul; 24(7):e13954.
Score: 0.108
-
Dependence of virtual wedge factor on dose calibration and monitor units. Med Phys. 2001 Feb; 28(2):174-7.
Score: 0.094
-
Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of Siemens virtual and physical wedges. Med Phys. 2000 Oct; 27(10):2267-77.
Score: 0.092
-
Quantifying the accuracy of deformable image registration for cone-beam computed tomography with a physical phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Oct; 20(10):92-100.
Score: 0.085
-
Characterization of a new physical phantom for testing rigid and deformable image registration. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jan; 20(1):145-153.
Score: 0.081
-
Geometric and dosimetric analysis of multileaf collimation conformity. Radiother Oncol. 1998 Apr; 47(1):63-8.
Score: 0.077
-
Multiple-CT optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy - Is it possible to eliminate adaptive planning? Radiother Oncol. 2018 07; 128(1):167-173.
Score: 0.075
-
A convolution-adapted ratio-TAR algorithm for 3D photon beam treatment planning. Med Phys. 1995 Aug; 22(8):1315-27.
Score: 0.064
-
Reducing Dose Uncertainty for Spot-Scanning Proton Beam Therapy of Moving Tumors by Optimizing the Spot Delivery Sequence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Nov 01; 93(3):547-56.
Score: 0.063
-
Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2015 Mar; 114(3):367-72.
Score: 0.062
-
Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2014 Nov 07; 59(21):6341-54.
Score: 0.060
-
Is there a clinical benefit with a smooth compensator design compared with a plunged compensator design for passive scattered protons? Med Dosim. 2015; 40(1):37-43.
Score: 0.060
-
Impact of respiratory motion on worst-case scenario optimized intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancers. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 Mar-Apr; 5(2):e77-86.
Score: 0.060
-
Intensity modulated proton therapy for craniospinal irradiation: organ-at-risk exposure and a low-gradient junctioning technique. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 01; 90(3):637-44.
Score: 0.060
-
Evaluation and mitigation of the interplay effects of intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancer in a clinical setting. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Nov-Dec; 4(6):e259-68.
Score: 0.060
-
Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15; 89(4):846-53.
Score: 0.059
-
Dosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Nov-Dec; 4(6):384-91.
Score: 0.057
-
Improving spot-scanning proton therapy patient specific quality assurance with HPlusQA, a second-check dose calculation engine. Med Phys. 2013 Dec; 40(12):121708.
Score: 0.057
-
Patient-specific quantification of respiratory motion-induced dose uncertainty for step-and-shoot IMRT of lung cancer. Med Phys. 2013 Dec; 40(12):121712.
Score: 0.057
-
Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: a treatment planning comparison. Med Dosim. 2013; 38(4):390-4.
Score: 0.056
-
Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer. Med Phys. 2013 Aug; 40(8):081709.
Score: 0.056
-
Incorporating deliverable monitor unit constraints into spot intensity optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Aug 07; 58(15):5113-25.
Score: 0.055
-
Statistical assessment of proton treatment plans under setup and range uncertainties. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Aug 01; 86(5):1007-13.
Score: 0.055
-
Use of treatment log files in spot scanning proton therapy as part of patient-specific quality assurance. Med Phys. 2013 Feb; 40(2):021703.
Score: 0.054
-
PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization. Med Phys. 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709.
Score: 0.054
-
Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to patient stopping-power-ratio estimation using the stoichiometric calibration. Phys Med Biol. 2012 Jul 07; 57(13):4095-115.
Score: 0.051
-
Fast range-corrected proton dose approximation method using prior dose distribution. Phys Med Biol. 2012 Jun 07; 57(11):3555-69.
Score: 0.051
-
A procedure to determine the planar integral spot dose values of proton pencil beam spots. Med Phys. 2012 Feb; 39(2):891-900.
Score: 0.050
-
A beam-specific planning target volume (PTV) design for proton therapy to account for setup and range uncertainties. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 01; 82(2):e329-36.
Score: 0.048
-
Characterization of dose impact on IMRT and VMAT from couch attenuation for two Varian couches. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011 Mar 02; 12(3):3471.
Score: 0.047
-
Spot scanning proton beam therapy for prostate cancer: treatment planning technique and analysis of consequences of rotational and translational alignment errors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Oct 01; 78(2):428-34.
Score: 0.044
-
Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009 Jan 27; 10(1):2875.
Score: 0.041
-
Assessment of the accuracy of an MCNPX-based Monte Carlo simulation model for predicting three-dimensional absorbed dose distributions. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Aug 21; 53(16):4455-70.
Score: 0.039
-
Incorporating partial shining effects in proton pencil-beam dose calculation. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Feb 07; 53(3):605-16.
Score: 0.038
-
Four-dimensional cone beam CT with adaptive gantry rotation and adaptive data sampling. Med Phys. 2007 Sep; 34(9):3520-9.
Score: 0.037
-
4D Proton treatment planning strategy for mobile lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 01; 67(3):906-14.
Score: 0.036
-
Effect of anatomic motion on proton therapy dose distributions in prostate cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Feb 01; 67(2):620-9.
Score: 0.036
-
Multiple regions-of-interest analysis of setup uncertainties for head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Apr 01; 64(5):1559-69.
Score: 0.034
-
Evaluation of Kodak EDR2 film for dose verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy delivered by a static multileaf collimator. Med Phys. 2002 Aug; 29(8):1687-92.
Score: 0.026
-
Implementation and verification of virtual wedge in a three-dimensional radiotherapy planning system. Med Phys. 2000 Jul; 27(7):1635-43.
Score: 0.022
-
Transitioning from measurement-based to combined patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Br J Radiol. 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190669.
Score: 0.022
-
A critical evaluation of the planning target volume for 3-D conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Aug 01; 42(1):213-21.
Score: 0.020
-
Multiple machine implementation of enhanced dynamic wedge. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Mar 01; 40(4):977-85.
Score: 0.019
-
Life years lost attributable to late effects after radiotherapy for early stage Hodgkin lymphoma: The impact of proton therapy and/or deep inspiration breath hold. Radiother Oncol. 2017 10; 125(1):41-47.
Score: 0.018
-
The influence of angular misalignment on fixed-portal intensity modulated radiation therapy. Med Phys. 1997 Jul; 24(7):1123-39.
Score: 0.018
-
Consensus Statement on Proton Therapy in Early-Stage and Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 01; 95(1):505-516.
Score: 0.017
-
A Retrospective Evaluation of the Benefit of Referring Pediatric Cancer Patients to an External Proton Therapy Center. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Feb; 63(2):262-9.
Score: 0.016
-
Measurement of a photon penumbra-generating kernel for a convolution-adapted ratio-TAR algorithm for 3D treatment planning. Med Phys. 1995 Sep; 22(9):1395-403.
Score: 0.016
-
Selective robust optimization: A new intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization strategy. Med Phys. 2015 Aug; 42(8):4840-7.
Score: 0.016
-
Spot scanning proton therapy for malignancies of the base of skull: treatment planning, acute toxicities, and preliminary clinical outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 01; 90(3):540-6.
Score: 0.015
-
Clinical implementation of intensity modulated proton therapy for thoracic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 15; 90(4):809-18.
Score: 0.015
-
On the interplay effects with proton scanning beams in stage III lung cancer. Med Phys. 2014 Feb; 41(2):021721.
Score: 0.014
-
Comparison of proton therapy techniques for treatment of the whole brain as a component of craniospinal radiation. Radiat Oncol. 2013 Dec 17; 8:289.
Score: 0.014
-
Intensity-modulated proton therapy further reduces normal tissue exposure during definitive therapy for locally advanced distal esophageal tumors: a dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Dec 01; 81(5):1336-42.
Score: 0.012
-
Verification of patient-specific dose distributions in proton therapy using a commercial two-dimensional ion chamber array. Med Phys. 2010 Nov; 37(11):5831-7.
Score: 0.012
-
The M. D. Anderson proton therapy system. Med Phys. 2009 Sep; 36(9):4068-83.
Score: 0.011
-
Improving accuracy of electron density measurement in the presence of metallic implants using orthovoltage computed tomography. Med Phys. 2008 May; 35(5):1932-41.
Score: 0.010
-
Reducing metal artifacts in cone-beam CT images by preprocessing projection data. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 01; 67(3):924-32.
Score: 0.009