Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by DIPEN MAHESHBHAI MARU and MANOOP BHUTANI.
DIPEN MAHESHBHAI MARU
Connection Strength
2.662
MANOOP BHUTANI
  1. A rare case of pancreatic metastasis of angiosarcoma: Diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and biopsy. Endosc Ultrasound. 2017 Sep-Oct; 6(5):340-342.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.623
  2. Signet ring cells in esophageal adenocarcinoma predict poor response to preoperative chemoradiation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Sep; 98(3):1064-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  3. Duplicated muscularis mucosae invasion has similar risk of lymph node metastasis and recurrence-free survival as intramucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011 Jul; 35(7):1045-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  4. Novel endoscopic application of a new flexible-fiber CO2 laser for esophageal mucosal ablation in a porcine model. Endoscopy. 2009 Feb; 41(2):138-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  5. Evaluation of a new flexible fiber CO2 laser for gastrointestinal cutting: NOTES and mucosectomy in a porcine model. Endoscopy. 2008 Sep; 40 Suppl 2:E200-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  6. Frequency and Implications of Paratracheal Lymph Node Metastases in Resectable Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2021 04 01; 273(4):751-757.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  7. Endoscopic esophageal tumor length: a prognostic factor for patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer. 2011 Jan 01; 117(1):63-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  8. Total Lesion Glycolysis Assessment Identifies a Patient Fraction With a High Cure Rate Among Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation. Ann Surg. 2020 08; 272(2):311-318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  9. Brain metastases in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer is associated with proximally located adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastases. Gastric Cancer. 2020 09; 23(5):904-912.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  10. Morbidity following salvage esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: the MD Anderson experience. Dis Esophagus. 2020 Mar 16; 33(3).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  11. Taxane-based or platinum-based combination chemotherapy given concurrently with radiation followed by surgery resulting in high cure rates in esophageal cancer patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb; 99(9):e19295.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  12. Recurrence Risk Stratification After Preoperative Chemoradiation of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2018 08; 268(2):289-295.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  13. Barrett's Esophagus after Bimodality Therapy in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Oncology. 2018; 95(2):81-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  14. Actionable Locoregional Relapses after Therapy of Localized Esophageal Cancer: Insights from a Large Cohort. Oncology. 2018; 94(6):345-353.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  15. Early Metabolic Change after Induction Chemotherapy Predicts Histologic Response and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Target Oncol. 2018 02; 13(1):99-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  16. Influence of induction chemotherapy in trimodality therapy-eligible oesophageal cancer patients: secondary analysis of a randomised trial. Br J Cancer. 2018 02 06; 118(3):331-337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  17. Pathological complete response in patients with esophageal cancer after the trimodality approach: The association with baseline variables and survival-The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2017 Nov 01; 123(21):4106-4113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  18. Nuclear expression of Gli-1 is predictive of pathologic complete response to chemoradiation in trimodality treated oesophageal cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2017 Aug 22; 117(5):648-655.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  19. 101 Long-Term Survivors Who Had Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancer and Received Local Consolidative Therapy. Oncology. 2017; 93(4):243-248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  20. Post-trimodality expression levels of metadherin (MTDH) as a prognostic biomarker for esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Med Oncol. 2017 Aug; 34(8):135.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  21. The impact of histology on recurrence patterns in esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2017 08; 124(2):318-324.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  22. Comparative Outcomes After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Using Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Institutional Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 11 01; 99(3):667-676.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  23. Utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of regional lymph nodes that are proximal to and far from the primary distal esophageal carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017 Oct 03; 8(45):79356-79365.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  24. Metastatic Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated with Systemic Therapy Followed by Consolidative Local Therapy: A Nomogram Associated with Long-Term Survivors. Oncology. 2016; 91(1):55-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  25. A Nomogram to Predict Distant Metastases After Multimodality Therapy for Patients With Localized Esophageal Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 02; 14(2):173-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  26. 18-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission computed tomography as predictive of response after chemoradiation in oesophageal cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov; 51(17):2545-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  27. Endoscopic Ultrasound Estimates for Tumor Depth at the Gastroesophageal Junction Are Inaccurate: Implications for the Liberal Use of Endoscopic Resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Nov; 100(5):1812-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  28. Geographic distribution of regional metastatic nodes affects the outcome of trimodality-eligible patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Oncology. 2015; 88(6):332-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  29. Importance of surveillance and success of salvage strategies after definitive chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 20; 32(30):3400-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  30. Post-chemoradiation surgical pathology stage can customize the surveillance strategy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Aug; 12(8):1139-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  31. Distribution and timing of distant metastasis after local therapy in a large cohort of patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer. Oncology. 2014; 86(5-6):336-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  32. ALDH-1 expression levels predict response or resistance to preoperative chemoradiation in resectable esophageal cancer patients. Mol Oncol. 2014 Feb; 8(1):142-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  33. Locoregional failure rate after preoperative chemoradiation of esophageal adenocarcinoma and the outcomes of salvage strategies. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 01; 31(34):4306-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  34. Incidence of brain metastases after trimodality therapy in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer: implications for screening and surveillance. Oncology. 2013; 85(4):204-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  35. Results of the baseline positron emission tomography can customize therapy of localized esophageal adenocarcinoma patients who achieve a clinical complete response after chemoradiation. Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov; 24(11):2854-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  36. A phase II randomized trial of induction chemotherapy versus no induction chemotherapy followed by preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov; 24(11):2844-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  37. Propensity-based matching between esophagogastric cancer patients who had surgery and who declined surgery after preoperative chemoradiation. Oncology. 2013; 85(2):95-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  38. Association between clinical complete response and pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with gastroesophageal cancer: analysis in a large cohort. Ann Oncol. 2013 May; 24(5):1262-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  39. Outcome of trimodality-eligible esophagogastric cancer patients who declined surgery after preoperative chemoradiation. Oncology. 2012; 83(5):300-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  40. A nomogram associated with high probability of malignant nodes in the surgical specimen after trimodality therapy of patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Dec; 48(18):3396-404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  41. Clinical parameters model for predicting pathologic complete response following preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct; 23(10):2638-2642.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  42. Nomograms for prognostication of outcome in patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal carcinoma undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy. Oncology. 2012; 82(2):108-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  43. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma: significance of microscopically positive circumferential radial margins. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb; 143(2):412-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  44. Patients with high body mass index tend to have lower stage of esophageal carcinoma at diagnosis. Dis Esophagus. 2012 Sep-Oct; 25(7):614-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  45. Pre-clinical evaluation of fluorescent deoxyglucose as a topical contrast agent for the detection of Barrett's-associated neoplasia during confocal imaging. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Oct; 10(5):431-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  46. Does the timing of esophagectomy after chemoradiation affect outcome? Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jan; 93(1):207-12; discussion 212-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  47. Prognostic significance of baseline positron emission tomography and importance of clinical complete response in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Cancer. 2011 Nov 01; 117(21):4823-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  48. Prognostic biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma identified by analysis of tumor transcriptome. PLoS One. 2010 Nov 30; 5(11):e15074.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  49. Combined modality therapy of cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer: the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2011 Mar 01; 117(5):925-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  50. The higher the decrease in the standardized uptake value of positron emission tomography after chemoradiation, the better the survival of patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2009 Nov 15; 115(22):5184-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  51. Impact of tumor length on long-term survival of pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Oct; 138(4):831-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  52. Influence of the baseline 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography results on survival and pathologic response in patients with gastroesophageal cancer undergoing chemoradiation. Cancer. 2009 Feb 01; 115(3):624-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  53. Check Sample Abstracts. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009 Feb; 131(2):286-299.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  54. Therapy-induced expression of NF-kappaB portends poor prognosis in patients with localized esophageal cancer undergoing preoperative chemoradiation. Dis Esophagus. 2009; 22(2):127-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  55. Influence of induction chemotherapy and class of cytotoxics on pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer. 2008 Sep 15; 113(6):1302-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.