Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by RADHE MOHAN and WENHUA CAO.
Connection Strength
3.238
-
Reply to Comment on 'Linear energy transfer incorporated intensity modulated proton therapy optimization'. Phys Med Biol. 2019 02 27; 64(5):058002.
Score: 0.672
-
Linear energy transfer incorporated intensity modulated proton therapy optimization. Phys Med Biol. 2017 12 19; 63(1):015013.
Score: 0.618
-
Clinical Translation of a Deep Learning Model of Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia for Esophageal Cancer. Int J Part Ther. 2024 Sep; 13:100624.
Score: 0.245
-
Incorporating variable RBE in IMPT optimization for ependymoma. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Jan; 25(1):e14207.
Score: 0.233
-
Reflections on beam configuration optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2022 06 27; 67(13).
Score: 0.211
-
A hybrid deep learning model for forecasting lymphocyte depletion during radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2022 May; 49(5):3507-3522.
Score: 0.207
-
Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia Risks of Photon Versus Proton Therapy for Esophageal Cancer Patients. Int J Part Ther. 2021; 8(2):17-27.
Score: 0.194
-
A biological effect-guided optimization approach using beam distal-edge avoidance for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Med Phys. 2020 Sep; 47(9):3816-3825.
Score: 0.185
-
Systematic microdosimetric data for protons of therapeutic energies calculated with Geant4-DNA. Phys Med Biol. 2019 11 04; 64(21):215018.
Score: 0.176
-
Robust optimization to reduce the impact of biological effect variation from physical uncertainties in intensity-modulated proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2019 01 08; 64(2):025004.
Score: 0.166
-
Radiobiological issues in proton therapy. Acta Oncol. 2017 Nov; 56(11):1367-1373.
Score: 0.151
-
Identifying Individualized Risk Profiles for Radiotherapy-Induced Lymphopenia Among Patients With Esophageal Cancer Using Machine Learning. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 09; 5:1044-1053.
Score: 0.050
-
Author Correction: Exploring the advantages of intensity-modulated proton therapy: experimental validation of biological effects using two different beam intensity-modulation patterns. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 30; 10(1):19101.
Score: 0.047
-
Exploring the advantages of intensity-modulated proton therapy: experimental validation of biological effects using two different beam intensity-modulation patterns. Sci Rep. 2020 02 21; 10(1):3199.
Score: 0.045
-
Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25.
Score: 0.037