Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by RADHE MOHAN and NARAYAN SAHOO.
Connection Strength
1.756
-
Mimicking large spot-scanning radiation fields for proton FLASH preclinical studies with a robotic motion platform. ArXiv. 2024 Sep 14.
Score: 0.245
-
Design and validation of a synchrotron proton beam line for FLASH radiotherapy preclinical research experiments. Med Phys. 2022 Jan; 49(1):497-509.
Score: 0.203
-
Potential for Improvements in Robustness and Optimality of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer with 4-Dimensional Robust Optimization. Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jan 01; 11(1).
Score: 0.165
-
RBE Model-Based Biological Dose Optimization for Proton Radiobiology Studies. Int J Part Ther. 2018; 5(1):160-171.
Score: 0.162
-
Impact of respiratory motion on worst-case scenario optimized intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancers. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 Mar-Apr; 5(2):e77-86.
Score: 0.123
-
Experimental characterization of the low-dose envelope of spot scanning proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jun 21; 55(12):3467-78.
Score: 0.091
-
Monte Carlo investigation of the low-dose envelope from scanned proton pencil beams. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Feb 07; 55(3):711-21.
Score: 0.089
-
Exploration of the potential of liquid scintillators for real-time 3D dosimetry of intensity modulated proton beams. Med Phys. 2009 May; 36(5):1736-43.
Score: 0.085
-
Assessment of the accuracy of an MCNPX-based Monte Carlo simulation model for predicting three-dimensional absorbed dose distributions. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Aug 21; 53(16):4455-70.
Score: 0.080
-
Incorporating partial shining effects in proton pencil-beam dose calculation. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Feb 07; 53(3):605-16.
Score: 0.077
-
Dosimetric response of Gafchromic? EBT-XD film to therapeutic protons. Precis Radiat Oncol. 2023 Mar; 7(1):15-26.
Score: 0.055
-
Adaptation and dosimetric commissioning of a synchrotron-based proton beamline for FLASH experiments. Phys Med Biol. 2022 08 05; 67(16).
Score: 0.053
-
Author Correction: Exploring the advantages of intensity-modulated proton therapy: experimental validation of biological effects using two different beam intensity-modulation patterns. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 30; 10(1):19101.
Score: 0.047
-
Exploring the advantages of intensity-modulated proton therapy: experimental validation of biological effects using two different beam intensity-modulation patterns. Sci Rep. 2020 02 21; 10(1):3199.
Score: 0.045
-
Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15; 89(4):846-53.
Score: 0.030
-
Dosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Nov-Dec; 4(6):384-91.
Score: 0.029
-
Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: a treatment planning comparison. Med Dosim. 2013; 38(4):390-4.
Score: 0.028
-
Statistical assessment of proton treatment plans under setup and range uncertainties. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Aug 01; 86(5):1007-13.
Score: 0.028
-
Verification of proton range, position, and intensity in IMPT with a 3D liquid scintillator detector system. Med Phys. 2012 Mar; 39(3):1239-46.
Score: 0.026
-
A procedure to determine the planar integral spot dose values of proton pencil beam spots. Med Phys. 2012 Feb; 39(2):891-900.
Score: 0.026
-
Parameterization of multiple Bragg curves for scanning proton beams using simultaneous fitting of multiple curves. Phys Med Biol. 2011 Dec 21; 56(24):7725-35.
Score: 0.025
-
An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle. Med Phys. 2010 Sep; 37(9):4960-70.
Score: 0.023
-
Liquid scintillator for 2D dosimetry for high-energy photon beams. Med Phys. 2009 May; 36(5):1478-85.
Score: 0.021