Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by RADHE MOHAN and UWE TITT.
Connection Strength
5.182
-
Design and validation of a synchrotron proton beam line for FLASH radiotherapy preclinical research experiments. Med Phys. 2022 Jan; 49(1):497-509.
Score: 0.806
-
Degradation of proton depth dose distributions attributable to microstructures in lung-equivalent material. Med Phys. 2015 Nov; 42(11):6425-32.
Score: 0.528
-
Adjustment of the lateral and longitudinal size of scanned proton beam spots using a pre-absorber to optimize penumbrae and delivery efficiency. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Dec 07; 55(23):7097-106.
Score: 0.374
-
Assessment of the accuracy of an MCNPX-based Monte Carlo simulation model for predicting three-dimensional absorbed dose distributions. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Aug 21; 53(16):4455-70.
Score: 0.319
-
Technical note: Monte Carlo study of the mechanism of proton-boron fusion therapy. Med Phys. 2022 Jan; 49(1):579-582.
Score: 0.201
-
Comparing 2 Monte Carlo Systems in Use for Proton Therapy Research. Int J Part Ther. 2019; 6(1):18-27.
Score: 0.168
-
Fixed- versus Variable-RBE Computations for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jan-Mar; 4(1):156-167.
Score: 0.164
-
RBE Model-Based Biological Dose Optimization for Proton Radiobiology Studies. Int J Part Ther. 2018; 5(1):160-171.
Score: 0.161
-
Erratum: "Monte Carlo simulations of 3 He ion physical characteristics in a water phantom and evaluation of radiobiological effectiveness" [Med. Phys. 43 (2), page range 761-776(2016)]. Med Phys. 2018 Mar; 45(3):1301.
Score: 0.155
-
Erratum: "Analysis of the track- and dose-averaged LET and LET spectra in proton therapy using the geant4 Monte Carlo code" [Med. Phys. 42 (11), page range 6234-6247(2015)]. Med Phys. 2018 Mar; 45(3):1302.
Score: 0.155
-
Comparison of Monte Carlo and analytical dose computations for intensity modulated proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2018 02 09; 63(4):045003.
Score: 0.154
-
Validation of a track repeating algorithm for intensity modulated proton therapy: clinical cases study. Phys Med Biol. 2016 Apr 07; 61(7):2633-45.
Score: 0.135
-
Monte Carlo simulations of ?He ion physical characteristics in a water phantom and evaluation of radiobiological effectiveness. Med Phys. 2016 Feb; 43(2):761-76.
Score: 0.134
-
Analysis of the track- and dose-averaged LET and LET spectra in proton therapy using the geant4 Monte Carlo code. Med Phys. 2015 Nov; 42(11):6234-47.
Score: 0.132
-
LET dependence of the response of EBT2 films in proton dosimetry modeled as a bimolecular chemical reaction. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Dec 07; 58(23):8477-91.
Score: 0.115
-
An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle. Med Phys. 2010 Sep; 37(9):4960-70.
Score: 0.092
-
Monte Carlo investigation of the low-dose envelope from scanned proton pencil beams. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Feb 07; 55(3):711-21.
Score: 0.088
-
Stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer using a flattening filter free Clinac. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009 Jan 27; 10(1):14-21.
Score: 0.083
-
Density heterogeneities and the influence of multiple Coulomb and nuclear scatterings on the Bragg peak distal edge of proton therapy beams. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Sep 07; 53(17):4605-19.
Score: 0.080
-
Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm. Phys Med Biol. 2007 Aug 07; 52(15):4569-84.
Score: 0.074
-
Treatment-planning study of prostate cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy with a Varian Clinac operated without a flattening filter. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Aug 01; 68(5):1567-71.
Score: 0.074
-
Monte Carlo study of backscatter in a flattening filter free clinical accelerator. Med Phys. 2006 Sep; 33(9):3270-3.
Score: 0.070
-
A flattening filter free photon treatment concept evaluation with Monte Carlo. Med Phys. 2006 Jun; 33(6):1595-602.
Score: 0.069
-
Properties of unflattened photon beams shaped by a multileaf collimator. Med Phys. 2006 Jun; 33(6):1738-46.
Score: 0.069
-
MCNPX simulation of a multileaf collimator. Med Phys. 2006 Feb; 33(2):402-4.
Score: 0.067
-
Defining the Optimal Radiation-induced Lymphopenia Metric to Discern Its Survival Impact in Esophageal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2025 Jan 02.
Score: 0.062
-
Discordance in acute gastrointestinal toxicity between synchrotron-based proton and linac-based electron ultra-high dose rate irradiation. bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 08.
Score: 0.061
-
Optimization of FLASH proton beams using a track-repeating algorithm. Med Phys. 2022 Oct; 49(10):6684-6698.
Score: 0.053
-
Roadmap: helium ion therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2022 08 05; 67(15).
Score: 0.053
-
Adaptation and dosimetric commissioning of a synchrotron-based proton beamline for FLASH experiments. Phys Med Biol. 2022 08 05; 67(16).
Score: 0.053
-
Mapping the Relative Biological Effectiveness of Proton, Helium and Carbon Ions with High-Throughput Techniques. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 05; 12(12).
Score: 0.047
-
Nonhomologous End Joining Is More Important Than Proton Linear Energy Transfer in Dictating Cell Death. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 12 01; 105(5):1119-1125.
Score: 0.043
-
Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Adaptive Planning for Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer. Int J Part Ther. 2017; 4(2):26-34.
Score: 0.038
-
Optimization of Monte Carlo particle transport parameters and validation of a novel high throughput experimental setup to measure the biological effects of particle beams. Med Phys. 2017 Nov; 44(11):6061-6073.
Score: 0.038
-
Differences in Normal Tissue Response in the Esophagus Between Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using In?Vivo Imaging Biomarkers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 11 15; 99(4):1013-1020.
Score: 0.037
-
Clinical evidence of variable proton biological effectiveness in pediatric patients treated for ependymoma. Radiother Oncol. 2016 12; 121(3):395-401.
Score: 0.035
-
Spatial mapping of the biologic effectiveness of scanned particle beams: towards biologically optimized particle therapy. Sci Rep. 2015 May 18; 5:9850.
Score: 0.032
-
Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to patient stopping-power-ratio estimation using the stoichiometric calibration. Phys Med Biol. 2012 Jul 07; 57(13):4095-115.
Score: 0.026
-
A procedure to determine the planar integral spot dose values of proton pencil beam spots. Med Phys. 2012 Feb; 39(2):891-900.
Score: 0.025
-
Experimental characterization of the low-dose envelope of spot scanning proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jun 21; 55(12):3467-78.
Score: 0.023
-
Energy spectra, sources, and shielding considerations for neutrons generated by a flattening filter-free Clinac. Med Phys. 2008 May; 35(5):1906-11.
Score: 0.020
-
Reduced neutron production through use of a flattening-filter-free accelerator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 15; 68(4):1260-4.
Score: 0.019
-
A Monte Carlo model for calculating out-of-field dose from a varian 6 MV beam. Med Phys. 2006 Nov; 33(11):4405-13.
Score: 0.018
-
Monte Carlo study of photon fields from a flattening filter-free clinical accelerator. Med Phys. 2006 Apr; 33(4):820-7.
Score: 0.017
-
Dosimetric properties of photon beams from a flattening filter free clinical accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 2006 Apr 07; 51(7):1907-17.
Score: 0.017