Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by RADHE MOHAN and XIAORONG RONALD ZHU.
Connection Strength
2.023
-
Mimicking large spot-scanning radiation fields for proton FLASH preclinical studies with a robotic motion platform. ArXiv. 2024 Sep 14.
Score: 0.247
-
Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers. Med Phys. 2013 May; 40(5):051711.
Score: 0.225
-
Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2015 Mar; 114(3):367-72.
Score: 0.127
-
Impact of respiratory motion on worst-case scenario optimized intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancers. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 Mar-Apr; 5(2):e77-86.
Score: 0.124
-
Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15; 89(4):846-53.
Score: 0.121
-
Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer. Med Phys. 2013 Aug; 40(8):081709.
Score: 0.114
-
PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization. Med Phys. 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709.
Score: 0.110
-
Parameterization of multiple Bragg curves for scanning proton beams using simultaneous fitting of multiple curves. Phys Med Biol. 2011 Dec 21; 56(24):7725-35.
Score: 0.102
-
Monte Carlo investigation of the low-dose envelope from scanned proton pencil beams. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Feb 07; 55(3):711-21.
Score: 0.089
-
Scatter kernel estimation with an edge-spread function method for cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Dec 07; 53(23):6729-48.
Score: 0.082
-
Assessment of the accuracy of an MCNPX-based Monte Carlo simulation model for predicting three-dimensional absorbed dose distributions. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Aug 21; 53(16):4455-70.
Score: 0.081
-
Incorporating partial shining effects in proton pencil-beam dose calculation. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Feb 07; 53(3):605-16.
Score: 0.078
-
Effect of anatomic motion on proton therapy dose distributions in prostate cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Feb 01; 67(2):620-9.
Score: 0.073
-
Adaptation and dosimetric commissioning of a synchrotron-based proton beamline for FLASH experiments. Phys Med Biol. 2022 08 05; 67(16).
Score: 0.053
-
Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Adaptive Planning for Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer. Int J Part Ther. 2017; 4(2):26-34.
Score: 0.039
-
Clinical Outcomes and Patterns of Disease Recurrence After Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 01; 95(1):360-367.
Score: 0.034
-
Dosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Nov-Dec; 4(6):384-91.
Score: 0.030
-
Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: a treatment planning comparison. Med Dosim. 2013; 38(4):390-4.
Score: 0.029
-
Statistical assessment of proton treatment plans under setup and range uncertainties. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Aug 01; 86(5):1007-13.
Score: 0.028
-
Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to patient stopping-power-ratio estimation using the stoichiometric calibration. Phys Med Biol. 2012 Jul 07; 57(13):4095-115.
Score: 0.026
-
A procedure to determine the planar integral spot dose values of proton pencil beam spots. Med Phys. 2012 Feb; 39(2):891-900.
Score: 0.026
-
An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle. Med Phys. 2010 Sep; 37(9):4960-70.
Score: 0.023
-
Experimental characterization of the low-dose envelope of spot scanning proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jun 21; 55(12):3467-78.
Score: 0.023
-
Theoretical variance analysis of single- and dual-energy computed tomography methods for calculating proton stopping power ratios of biological tissues. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Mar 07; 55(5):1343-62.
Score: 0.022
-
The M. D. Anderson proton therapy system. Med Phys. 2009 Sep; 36(9):4068-83.
Score: 0.022
-
Improving accuracy of electron density measurement in the presence of metallic implants using orthovoltage computed tomography. Med Phys. 2008 May; 35(5):1932-41.
Score: 0.020
-
Comparison of 2D radiographic images and 3D cone beam computed tomography for positioning head-and-neck radiotherapy patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jul 01; 71(3):916-25.
Score: 0.020
-
Four-dimensional cone beam CT with adaptive gantry rotation and adaptive data sampling. Med Phys. 2007 Sep; 34(9):3520-9.
Score: 0.019
-
4D Proton treatment planning strategy for mobile lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 01; 67(3):906-14.
Score: 0.018
-
Multiple regions-of-interest analysis of setup uncertainties for head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Apr 01; 64(5):1559-69.
Score: 0.017