Header Logo

Connection

MICHAEL FRUMOVITZ to Hysterectomy

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications MICHAEL FRUMOVITZ has written about Hysterectomy.
MICHAEL FRUMOVITZ
Connection Strength
6.481
Hysterectomy
  1. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 06; 21(6):851-860.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.533
  2. Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Nov - Dec; 25(7):1224-1230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.456
  3. Patterns of recurrence and survival in neuroendocrine cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Dec; 143(3):552-557.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.412
  4. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with morcellation: should it stay or should it go? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Feb; 22(2):185-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.359
  5. Utility of conization with frozen section for intraoperative triage prior to definitive hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov; 127(2):307-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.309
  6. Outcomes of patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer of high-risk histological subtypes. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Jan; 21(1):123-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.277
  7. Laparoscopic total hysterectomy vs supracervical hysterectomy: turn, turn, turn. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov-Dec; 17(6):669-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.274
  8. Parametrial involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul; 114(1):93-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.250
  9. Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Sep; 110(3 Suppl 2):S21-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  10. Puntambekar et Al. Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Mar-Apr; 15(2):254-5; author reply 255.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  11. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul; 110(1):96-102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  12. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: surgical technique and instrumentation. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Feb; 104(2 Suppl 1):13-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  13. Usefulness of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in patients who undergo radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr; 194(4):1186-93; discussion 1193-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  14. LACC Trial: Final Analysis on Overall Survival Comparing Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 10; 42(23):2741-2746.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  15. Impact of pelvic radiation therapy in patients with early neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma and no residual disease in the radical hysterectomy specimen: a NeCTuR study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Feb 05; 34(2):209-215.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  16. Sentinel lymph node mapping with indocyanine green using SPY-PHI in open radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Jan 05; 34(1):28-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  17. Open radical hysterectomy: The new standard of care in early-stage cervical cancer. BJOG. 2023 07; 130(8):851-855.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  18. The role of postoperative radiation after radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: A meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2023 03; 170:328-332.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  19. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2020 07 01; 6(7):1019-1027.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  20. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 03; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  21. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15; 379(20):1895-1904.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  22. Sensitivity and negative predictive value for sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 04; 145(1):96-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  23. Clinically significant endometrial cancer risk following a diagnosis of complex atypical hyperplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Dec; 135(3):451-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  24. Sentinel lymph node evaluation in women with cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug; 21(4):540-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  25. Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care? Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan; 132(1):254-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  26. Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. JSLS. 2012 Jul-Sep; 16(3):503-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  27. Quality of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in developing countries: a comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes between a comprehensive cancer center in the United States and a cancer center in Colombia. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May; 125(2):326-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  28. Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Nov; 123(2):333-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  29. Minimally invasive surgical approaches for patients with endometrial cancer. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun; 54(2):226-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  30. Gallbladder carcinoma presenting as a pelvic mass with elevated serum testosterone: a case report. J Reprod Med. 2009 Apr; 54(4):259-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  31. Vascular pseudoinvasion in laparoscopic hysterectomy specimens for endometrial carcinoma: a grossing artifact? Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Feb; 33(2):298-303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  32. Radical hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct; 112(4):899-905.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  33. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Sep-Oct; 15(5):584-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  34. Quality of life and sexual functioning in cervical cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 20; 23(30):7428-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  35. Accuracy of pre-operative tumor size assessment compared to final pathology and frequency of adjuvant treatment in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Dec 02; 34(12):1861-1866.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  36. ConCerv: a prospective trial of conservative surgery for low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 10; 31(10):1317-1325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  37. Implementation of a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm for endometrial cancer: surgical outcomes and hospital charges. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 03; 30(3):352-357.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  38. Preoperative PET/CT does not accurately detect extrauterine disease in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk endometrial cancer: A prospective study. Cancer. 2019 10 01; 125(19):3347-3353.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  39. Radical parametrectomy after 'cut-through' hysterectomy in low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: Time to consider this procedure obsolete. Gynecol Oncol. 2018 06; 149(3):520-524.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  40. Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Jul; 25(6):1121-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  41. Significance of lymph node ratio in defining risk category in node-positive early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jan; 136(1):48-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  42. Successful incorporation of robotic surgery into gynecologic oncology fellowship training. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Dec; 131(3):730-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  43. Risk of residual disease and invasive carcinoma in women treated for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jun; 129(3):513-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  44. Comparison of single-port laparoscopy, standard laparoscopy, and robotic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 May; 19(5):1583-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  45. Conservative surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: what percentage of patients may be eligible for conization and lymphadenectomy? Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Nov; 119(2):183-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  46. Microscopic evaluation of lymph-node-bearing tissue in early-stage cervical cancer: a dual-institution review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Apr; 17(4):1106-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  47. Preoperative pathologic findings associated with residual disease at radical hysterectomy in women with stage IA2 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jan; 112(1):110-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  48. Adenosquamous carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma in early-stage cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy: an outcomes analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Dec; 107(3):458-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  49. Preoperative lymph-vascular space invasion is associated with nodal metastases in women with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jul; 106(1):12-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.