Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by TANYA MOSELEY and TAMARA MINER HAYGOOD.
Connection Strength

1.170
  1. Detection of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct; 197(4):W761-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  2. Why does it take longer to read digital than film-screen screening mammograms? A partial explanation. J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr; 23(2):170-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  3. Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jan; 192(1):216-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  4. Stereoscopic interpretation of low-dose breast tomosynthesis projection images. J Digit Imaging. 2014 Apr; 27(2):248-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  5. Computer-aided diagnosis in breast magnetic resonance imaging. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011 Mar-Apr; 78(2):280-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  6. Snakules: a model-based active contour algorithm for the annotation of spicules on mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Oct; 29(10):1768-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  7. Conspicuity of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. Acad Radiol. 2009 Dec; 16(12):1509-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  8. Evaluation of stylus for radiographic image annotation. J Digit Imaging. 2010 Dec; 23(6):701-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  9. Radiologist experience effects on contrast detection. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2014 Nov 01; 31(11):2328-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  10. Challenges in mammography: part 1, artifacts in digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec; 197(6):W1023-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  11. Interpretation time of computer-aided detection at screening mammography. Radiology. 2010 Oct; 257(1):40-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.