TANYA MOSELEY to Mammography
This is a "connection" page, showing publications TANYA MOSELEY has written about Mammography.
Connection Strength
2.809
-
Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun; 59(2):362-79.
Score: 0.365
-
Snakules: a model-based active contour algorithm for the annotation of spicules on mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Oct; 29(10):1768-80.
Score: 0.241
-
Evaluation of stylus for radiographic image annotation. J Digit Imaging. 2010 Dec; 23(6):701-5.
Score: 0.229
-
The reliability of measuring physical characteristics of spiculated masses on mammography. Br J Radiol. 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2:S134-40.
Score: 0.189
-
Radiologist experience effects on contrast detection. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2014 Nov 01; 31(11):2328-33.
Score: 0.164
-
Challenging Contrast-Enhanced Mammography-Guided Biopsies: Practical Approach Using Real-Time Multimodality Imaging and a Proposed Procedural Algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 04; 220(4):512-523.
Score: 0.142
-
Challenges in mammography: part 1, artifacts in digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec; 197(6):W1023-30.
Score: 0.134
-
The Challenging Image-Guided Preoperative Breast Localization: A Modality-Based Approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 03; 218(3):423-434.
Score: 0.132
-
Detection of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct; 197(4):W761-8.
Score: 0.132
-
Interpretation time of computer-aided detection at screening mammography. Radiology. 2010 Oct; 257(1):40-6.
Score: 0.122
-
Why does it take longer to read digital than film-screen screening mammograms? A partial explanation. J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr; 23(2):170-80.
Score: 0.110
-
Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jan; 192(1):216-20.
Score: 0.109
-
Comparison of slot scanning digital mammography system with full-field digital mammography system. Med Phys. 2008 Jun; 35(6):2339-46.
Score: 0.105
-
Biopsy Feasibility Trial for Breast Cancer Pathologic Complete Response Detection after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Imaging Assessment and Correlation Endpoints. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul; 25(7):1953-1960.
Score: 0.104
-
Effect of Mammography on Marker Clip Migration After Stereotactic-Guided Core Needle Breast Biopsy. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2017 Nov - Dec; 46(6):410-414.
Score: 0.096
-
Stereoscopic interpretation of low-dose breast tomosynthesis projection images. J Digit Imaging. 2014 Apr; 27(2):248-54.
Score: 0.079
-
Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film). Med Phys. 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61.
Score: 0.070
-
Conspicuity of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. Acad Radiol. 2009 Dec; 16(12):1509-17.
Score: 0.058
-
Accuracy of the combination of mammography and sonography in predicting tumor response in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Nov; 13(11):1443-9.
Score: 0.047
-
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Histopathologic Features, Genomics, and Treatment. Radiographics. 2023 10; 43(10):e230034.
Score: 0.038
-
Lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core needle biopsy: when should it be excised? Mod Pathol. 2003 Feb; 16(2):120-9.
Score: 0.036
-
The many faces of fat necrosis in the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Mar; 192(3):815-25.
Score: 0.028
-
A Clinical Feasibility Trial for Identification of Exceptional Responders in Whom Breast Cancer Surgery Can Be Eliminated Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy. Ann Surg. 2018 05; 267(5):946-951.
Score: 0.026
-
The role of ultrasound in the surgical management of patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast J. 2006 May-Jun; 12(3):212-5.
Score: 0.023
-
Rosai-Dorfman disease of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Oct; 185(4):971-2.
Score: 0.022
-
Surgical decision making and factors determining a diagnosis of breast carcinoma in women presenting with nipple discharge. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Mar; 196(3):354-64.
Score: 0.009