Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by JEAN NICOLAS VAUTHEY and CATHY ENG.
Connection Strength

1.030
  1. Deleterious Effect of RAS and Evolutionary High-risk TP53 Double Mutation in Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg. 2019 05; 269(5):917-923.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  2. The role of systemic chemotherapy and multidisciplinary management in improving the overall survival of patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Oncotarget. 2014 Nov 30; 5(22):11133-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  3. High survival rate after two-stage resection of advanced colorectal liver metastases: response-based selection and complete resection define outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 10; 29(8):1083-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  4. Pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy: a new outcome end point after resection of hepatic colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 20; 26(33):5344-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  5. Bevacizumab improves pathologic response and protects against hepatic injury in patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases. Cancer. 2007 Dec 15; 110(12):2761-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  6. Chemotherapy regimen predicts steatohepatitis and an increase in 90-day mortality after surgery for hepatic colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 01; 24(13):2065-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  7. Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg. 2005 May; 241(5):715-22, discussion 722-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  8. Hepatic Metastasectomy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal: A Case Series of a Curative Approach. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 31; 15(15).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  9. The prognostic impact of RAS on overall survival following liver resection in early versus late-onset colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2021 02; 124(4):797-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  10. Minimally invasive management of the entire treatment sequence in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: a propensity-score weighting analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2018 12; 20(12):1150-1156.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  11. Comparison of early radiological predictors of outcome in patients with colorectal cancer with unresectable hepatic metastases treated with bevacizumab. Gut. 2018 06; 67(6):1095-1102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  12. Total Laparoscopic Management for Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Requiring Multivisceral Resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep; 24(9):2595.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  13. Total Transthoracic Approach Facilitates Laparoscopic Hepatic Resection in Patients with Significant Prior Abdominal Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 May; 24(5):1376-1377.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  14. Oxaliplatin-mediated increase in spleen size as a biomarker for the development of hepatic sinusoidal injury. J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 20; 28(15):2549-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  15. Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 01; 27(22):3677-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  16. Systemic chemotherapy and two-stage hepatectomy for extensive bilateral colorectal liver metastases: perioperative safety and survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Nov; 11(11):1498-504; discussion 1504-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  17. Southwest Oncology Group 0408: Phase II trial of neoadjuvant capecitabine/oxaliplatin/bevacizumab for resectable colorectal metastases in the liver. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2006 Mar; 5(6):436-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  18. Long-term results using local excision after preoperative chemoradiation among selected T3 rectal cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Nov 15; 60(4):1098-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.