Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by GARY J WHITMAN and TAMARA MINER HAYGOOD.
Connection Strength

2.263
  1. Detection of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct; 197(4):W761-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.419
  2. Conspicuity of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. Acad Radiol. 2009 Dec; 16(12):1509-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.369
  3. Why does it take longer to read digital than film-screen screening mammograms? A partial explanation. J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr; 23(2):170-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  4. Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jan; 192(1):216-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.346
  5. Interpretation time for screening mammography as a function of the number of computer-aided detection marks. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020 Mar; 7(2):022408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  6. Stereoscopic interpretation of low-dose breast tomosynthesis projection images. J Digit Imaging. 2014 Apr; 27(2):248-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  7. Challenges in mammography: part 1, artifacts in digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec; 197(6):W1023-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  8. Interpretation time of computer-aided detection at screening mammography. Radiology. 2010 Oct; 257(1):40-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  9. Results of a survey on digital screening mammography: prevalence, efficiency, and use of ancillary diagnostic AIDS. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Apr; 5(4):585-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  10. Radiologist experience effects on contrast detection. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2014 Nov 01; 31(11):2328-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  11. Trend of contrast detection threshold with and without localization. J Digit Imaging. 2013 Dec; 26(6):1099-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  12. Verification of DICOM GSDF in complex backgrounds. J Digit Imaging. 2012 Oct; 25(5):662-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  13. Computer-aided diagnosis in breast magnetic resonance imaging. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011 Mar-Apr; 78(2):280-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  14. Snakules: a model-based active contour algorithm for the annotation of spicules on mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Oct; 29(10):1768-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  15. Evaluation of stylus for radiographic image annotation. J Digit Imaging. 2010 Dec; 23(6):701-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  16. Computer-aided detection of breast cancer - have all bases been covered? Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2008; 2:5-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.