GARY J WHITMAN to Observer Variation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications GARY J WHITMAN has written about Observer Variation.
Connection Strength
0.381
-
Comparing performance of the CADstream and the DynaCAD breast MRI CAD systems : CADstream vs. DynaCAD in breast MRI. J Digit Imaging. 2013 Oct; 26(5):971-6.
Score: 0.096
-
Detection of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct; 197(4):W761-8.
Score: 0.083
-
Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jan; 192(1):216-20.
Score: 0.069
-
Negative mammograms in symptomatic patients with breast cancer. Acad Radiol. 1998 Jan; 5(1):26-33.
Score: 0.032
-
Radiologist experience effects on contrast detection. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2014 Nov 01; 31(11):2328-33.
Score: 0.026
-
Automatic segmentation of whole breast using atlas approach and deformable image registration. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Apr 01; 73(5):1493-500.
Score: 0.017
-
Results of a survey on digital screening mammography: prevalence, efficiency, and use of ancillary diagnostic AIDS. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Apr; 5(4):585-92.
Score: 0.016
-
Comparison of algorithms to enhance spicules of spiculated masses on mammography. J Digit Imaging. 2008 Mar; 21(1):9-17.
Score: 0.016
-
The reliability of measuring physical characteristics of spiculated masses on mammography. Br J Radiol. 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2:S134-40.
Score: 0.015
-
Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film). Med Phys. 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61.
Score: 0.011