Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by JAFFER A AJANI and DIPEN MAHESHBHAI MARU.
Connection Strength
7.426
-
PD-L1 expression and overall survival in Asian and western patients with gastric cancer. Future Oncol. 2022 Jul; 18(21):2623-2634.
Score: 0.209
-
Frequency and Implications of Paratracheal Lymph Node Metastases in Resectable Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2021 04 01; 273(4):751-757.
Score: 0.193
-
Total Lesion Glycolysis Assessment Identifies a Patient Fraction With a High Cure Rate Among Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation. Ann Surg. 2020 08; 272(2):311-318.
Score: 0.184
-
Brain metastases in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer is associated with proximally located adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastases. Gastric Cancer. 2020 09; 23(5):904-912.
Score: 0.181
-
Taxane-based or platinum-based combination chemotherapy given concurrently with radiation followed by surgery resulting in high cure rates in esophageal cancer patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb; 99(9):e19295.
Score: 0.178
-
A novel patient-derived orthotopic xenograft model of esophageal adenocarcinoma provides a platform for translational discoveries. Dis Model Mech. 2019 12 17; 12(12).
Score: 0.177
-
Targeting CDK9 and MCL-1 by a new CDK9/p-TEFb inhibitor with and without 5-fluorouracil in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019; 11:1758835919864850.
Score: 0.172
-
Targeting cyclin-dependent kinase 9 by a novel inhibitor enhances radiosensitization and identifies Axl as a novel downstream target in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2019 Jul 23; 10(45):4703-4718.
Score: 0.172
-
Barrett's Esophagus after Bimodality Therapy in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Oncology. 2018; 95(2):81-90.
Score: 0.159
-
Actionable Locoregional Relapses after Therapy of Localized Esophageal Cancer: Insights from a Large Cohort. Oncology. 2018; 94(6):345-353.
Score: 0.158
-
Early Metabolic Change after Induction Chemotherapy Predicts Histologic Response and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Target Oncol. 2018 02; 13(1):99-106.
Score: 0.155
-
Influence of induction chemotherapy in trimodality therapy-eligible oesophageal cancer patients: secondary analysis of a randomised trial. Br J Cancer. 2018 02 06; 118(3):331-337.
Score: 0.154
-
Pathological complete response in patients with esophageal cancer after the trimodality approach: The association with baseline variables and survival-The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2017 Nov 01; 123(21):4106-4113.
Score: 0.151
-
Nuclear expression of Gli-1 is predictive of pathologic complete response to chemoradiation in trimodality treated oesophageal cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2017 Aug 22; 117(5):648-655.
Score: 0.149
-
101 Long-Term Survivors Who Had Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancer and Received Local Consolidative Therapy. Oncology. 2017; 93(4):243-248.
Score: 0.149
-
Utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of regional lymph nodes that are proximal to and far from the primary distal esophageal carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017 Oct 03; 8(45):79356-79365.
Score: 0.148
-
Antitumor effects of cyclin dependent kinase 9 inhibition in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 25; 8(17):28696-28710.
Score: 0.147
-
Metastatic Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated with Systemic Therapy Followed by Consolidative Local Therapy: A Nomogram Associated with Long-Term Survivors. Oncology. 2016; 91(1):55-60.
Score: 0.137
-
A Nomogram to Predict Distant Metastases After Multimodality Therapy for Patients With Localized Esophageal Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 02; 14(2):173-9.
Score: 0.135
-
18-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission computed tomography as predictive of response after chemoradiation in oesophageal cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov; 51(17):2545-52.
Score: 0.131
-
Geographic distribution of regional metastatic nodes affects the outcome of trimodality-eligible patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Oncology. 2015; 88(6):332-6.
Score: 0.127
-
A nomogram that predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation also predicts survival outcomes after definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Feb; 6(1):45-52.
Score: 0.126
-
Importance of surveillance and success of salvage strategies after definitive chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 20; 32(30):3400-5.
Score: 0.123
-
Post-chemoradiation surgical pathology stage can customize the surveillance strategy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Aug; 12(8):1139-44.
Score: 0.122
-
Signet ring cells in esophageal adenocarcinoma predict poor response to preoperative chemoradiation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Sep; 98(3):1064-71.
Score: 0.121
-
Distribution and timing of distant metastasis after local therapy in a large cohort of patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer. Oncology. 2014; 86(5-6):336-9.
Score: 0.120
-
ALDH-1 expression levels predict response or resistance to preoperative chemoradiation in resectable esophageal cancer patients. Mol Oncol. 2014 Feb; 8(1):142-9.
Score: 0.115
-
Locoregional failure rate after preoperative chemoradiation of esophageal adenocarcinoma and the outcomes of salvage strategies. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 01; 31(34):4306-10.
Score: 0.115
-
Incidence of brain metastases after trimodality therapy in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer: implications for screening and surveillance. Oncology. 2013; 85(4):204-7.
Score: 0.115
-
Results of the baseline positron emission tomography can customize therapy of localized esophageal adenocarcinoma patients who achieve a clinical complete response after chemoradiation. Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov; 24(11):2854-9.
Score: 0.114
-
A phase II randomized trial of induction chemotherapy versus no induction chemotherapy followed by preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov; 24(11):2844-9.
Score: 0.114
-
Propensity-based matching between esophagogastric cancer patients who had surgery and who declined surgery after preoperative chemoradiation. Oncology. 2013; 85(2):95-9.
Score: 0.113
-
Association between clinical complete response and pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with gastroesophageal cancer: analysis in a large cohort. Ann Oncol. 2013 May; 24(5):1262-6.
Score: 0.109
-
Outcome of trimodality-eligible esophagogastric cancer patients who declined surgery after preoperative chemoradiation. Oncology. 2012; 83(5):300-4.
Score: 0.107
-
A nomogram associated with high probability of malignant nodes in the surgical specimen after trimodality therapy of patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Dec; 48(18):3396-404.
Score: 0.106
-
Clinical parameters model for predicting pathologic complete response following preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct; 23(10):2638-2642.
Score: 0.106
-
Nomograms for prognostication of outcome in patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal carcinoma undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy. Oncology. 2012; 82(2):108-13.
Score: 0.103
-
Patients with high body mass index tend to have lower stage of esophageal carcinoma at diagnosis. Dis Esophagus. 2012 Sep-Oct; 25(7):614-22.
Score: 0.101
-
Duplicated muscularis mucosae invasion has similar risk of lymph node metastasis and recurrence-free survival as intramucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011 Jul; 35(7):1045-53.
Score: 0.098
-
Prognostic significance of baseline positron emission tomography and importance of clinical complete response in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Cancer. 2011 Nov 01; 117(21):4823-33.
Score: 0.097
-
Combined modality therapy of cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer: the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2011 Mar 01; 117(5):925-30.
Score: 0.094
-
Improved long-term outcome with chemoradiotherapy strategies in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep; 90(3):892-8; discussion 898-9.
Score: 0.093
-
Endoscopic esophageal tumor length: a prognostic factor for patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer. 2011 Jan 01; 117(1):63-9.
Score: 0.093
-
Trimodality therapy without a platinum compound for localized carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Cancer. 2010 Apr 01; 116(7):1656-63.
Score: 0.090
-
The higher the decrease in the standardized uptake value of positron emission tomography after chemoradiation, the better the survival of patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2009 Nov 15; 115(22):5184-92.
Score: 0.088
-
Anti-phosphorylated histone H3 expression in Barrett's esophagus, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2009 Dec; 22(12):1612-21.
Score: 0.087
-
Frequent loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 1q in esophageal adenocarcinoma: loss of chromosome 1q21.3 is associated with shorter overall survival. Cancer. 2009 Apr 01; 115(7):1576-85.
Score: 0.084
-
Influence of the baseline 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography results on survival and pathologic response in patients with gastroesophageal cancer undergoing chemoradiation. Cancer. 2009 Feb 01; 115(3):624-30.
Score: 0.083
-
Therapy-induced expression of NF-kappaB portends poor prognosis in patients with localized esophageal cancer undergoing preoperative chemoradiation. Dis Esophagus. 2009; 22(2):127-32.
Score: 0.082
-
Adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus with Barrett's esophagus or without Barrett's esophagus: differences in patients' survival after preoperative chemoradiation. Dis Esophagus. 2009; 22(1):32-41.
Score: 0.082
-
Influence of induction chemotherapy and class of cytotoxics on pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer. 2008 Sep 15; 113(6):1302-8.
Score: 0.081
-
Retrospective study of clinicopathologic features and prognosis of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 Sep; 32(9):1404-11.
Score: 0.081
-
Significance of thromboembolic phenomena occurring before and during chemoradiotherapy for localized carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Dis Esophagus. 2008; 21(7):575-81.
Score: 0.079
-
Lymphovascular invasion as a tool to further subclassify T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2008 Mar 01; 112(5):1020-7.
Score: 0.078
-
Gastric Extent of Tumor Predicts Peritoneal Metastasis in Siewert II Adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 02; 117(2):320-326.
Score: 0.056
-
Salvage Esophagectomy Definition Influences Comparative Outcomes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancers. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 12; 114(6):2032-2040.
Score: 0.051
-
ARID1A Mutation May Define an Immunologically Active Subgroup in Patients with Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 03 15; 27(6):1663-1670.
Score: 0.048
-
Esophageal adenocarcinoma with any component of signet ring cells portends poor prognosis and response to neoadjuvant therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Nov; 162(5):1404-1412.e2.
Score: 0.046
-
Modified En Bloc Esophagectomy Compared With Standard Resection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 04; 111(4):1133-1140.
Score: 0.046
-
Morbidity following salvage esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: the MD Anderson experience. Dis Esophagus. 2020 Mar 16; 33(3).
Score: 0.045
-
Recurrence Risk Stratification After Preoperative Chemoradiation of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2018 08; 268(2):289-295.
Score: 0.040
-
Outcomes after endoscopic mucosal resection or esophagectomy for submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 07; 156(1):406-413.e3.
Score: 0.039
-
Post-trimodality expression levels of metadherin (MTDH) as a prognostic biomarker for esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Med Oncol. 2017 Aug; 34(8):135.
Score: 0.037
-
Comparative Outcomes After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Using Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Institutional Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 11 01; 99(3):667-676.
Score: 0.037
-
Early clinical esophageal adenocarcinoma (cT1): Utility of CT in regional nodal metastasis detection and can the clinical accuracy be improved? Eur J Radiol. 2017 Mar; 88:56-60.
Score: 0.036
-
Hippo coactivator YAP1 upregulates SOX9 and endows esophageal cancer cells with stem-like properties. Cancer Res. 2014 Aug 01; 74(15):4170-82.
Score: 0.030
-
Loss of TGF-? adaptor ?2SP activates notch signaling and SOX9 expression in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2013 Apr 01; 73(7):2159-69.
Score: 0.028
-
Salvage esophagectomy after failed definitive chemoradiation for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Oct; 94(4):1126-32; discussion 1132-3.
Score: 0.027
-
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma: significance of microscopically positive circumferential radial margins. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb; 143(2):412-20.
Score: 0.025
-
Does the timing of esophagectomy after chemoradiation affect outcome? Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jan; 93(1):207-12; discussion 212-3.
Score: 0.025
-
Prognostic biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma identified by analysis of tumor transcriptome. PLoS One. 2010 Nov 30; 5(11):e15074.
Score: 0.024
-
Pathologic T0N1 esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery: an orphan status. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep; 90(3):884-90; discussion 890-1.
Score: 0.023
-
Impact of tumor length on long-term survival of pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Oct; 138(4):831-6.
Score: 0.021
-
Esophageal tumor length is independently associated with long-term survival. Cancer. 2009 Feb 01; 115(3):508-16.
Score: 0.021
-
Chemoradiation therapy for potentially resectable gastric cancer: clinical outcomes among patients who do not undergo planned surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 May 01; 71(1):167-72.
Score: 0.020
-
Proposed modification of nodal status in AJCC esophageal cancer staging system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Aug; 84(2):365-73; discussion 374-5.
Score: 0.019