Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by JAFFER A AJANI and JEFFREY H LEE.
JAFFER A AJANI
Connection Strength
4.557
JEFFREY H LEE
  1. Prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma patients with various burdens of peritoneal metastases. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan; 113(1):29-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  2. Geographic distribution of regional metastatic nodes affects the outcome of trimodality-eligible patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Oncology. 2015; 88(6):332-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  3. Importance of surveillance and success of salvage strategies after definitive chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 20; 32(30):3400-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  4. Post-chemoradiation surgical pathology stage can customize the surveillance strategy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Aug; 12(8):1139-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  5. Distribution and timing of distant metastasis after local therapy in a large cohort of patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer. Oncology. 2014; 86(5-6):336-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  6. ALDH-1 expression levels predict response or resistance to preoperative chemoradiation in resectable esophageal cancer patients. Mol Oncol. 2014 Feb; 8(1):142-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  7. Locoregional failure rate after preoperative chemoradiation of esophageal adenocarcinoma and the outcomes of salvage strategies. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 01; 31(34):4306-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  8. Incidence of brain metastases after trimodality therapy in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer: implications for screening and surveillance. Oncology. 2013; 85(4):204-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  9. Results of the baseline positron emission tomography can customize therapy of localized esophageal adenocarcinoma patients who achieve a clinical complete response after chemoradiation. Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov; 24(11):2854-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  10. A phase II randomized trial of induction chemotherapy versus no induction chemotherapy followed by preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov; 24(11):2844-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  11. Propensity-based matching between esophagogastric cancer patients who had surgery and who declined surgery after preoperative chemoradiation. Oncology. 2013; 85(2):95-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  12. Association between clinical complete response and pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with gastroesophageal cancer: analysis in a large cohort. Ann Oncol. 2013 May; 24(5):1262-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  13. Surveillance for esophageal cancer: does it make sense? J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012 Dec 01; 10(12):1590-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  14. Outcome of trimodality-eligible esophagogastric cancer patients who declined surgery after preoperative chemoradiation. Oncology. 2012; 83(5):300-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  15. A nomogram associated with high probability of malignant nodes in the surgical specimen after trimodality therapy of patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Dec; 48(18):3396-404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  16. Clinical parameters model for predicting pathologic complete response following preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct; 23(10):2638-2642.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  17. Localized gastric cancer treated with chemoradation without surgery: UTMD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Oncology. 2012; 82(6):347-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  18. Nomograms for prognostication of outcome in patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal carcinoma undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy. Oncology. 2012; 82(2):108-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  19. Patients with high body mass index tend to have lower stage of esophageal carcinoma at diagnosis. Dis Esophagus. 2012 Sep-Oct; 25(7):614-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  20. Update: modern approaches to the treatment of localized esophageal cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2011 Jun; 13(3):157-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  21. Prognostic significance of baseline positron emission tomography and importance of clinical complete response in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Cancer. 2011 Nov 01; 117(21):4823-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  22. The influence of high body mass index on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer after surgery as primary therapy. Cancer. 2010 Dec 15; 116(24):5619-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  23. Combined modality therapy of cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer: the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2011 Mar 01; 117(5):925-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  24. Critical role of surgery in patients with gastroesophageal carcinoma with a poor prognosis after chemoradiation as defined by positron emission tomography. Cancer. 2010 Oct 01; 116(19):4487-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  25. Improved long-term outcome with chemoradiotherapy strategies in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep; 90(3):892-8; discussion 898-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  26. Endoscopic esophageal tumor length: a prognostic factor for patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer. 2011 Jan 01; 117(1):63-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  27. The standardized uptake value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after chemoradiation and clinical outcome in patients with localized gastroesophageal carcinoma. Oncology. 2010; 78(5-6):316-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  28. Trimodality therapy without a platinum compound for localized carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Cancer. 2010 Apr 01; 116(7):1656-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  29. Multimodality approaches to localized gastric cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Apr; 8(4):417-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  30. The higher the decrease in the standardized uptake value of positron emission tomography after chemoradiation, the better the survival of patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2009 Nov 15; 115(22):5184-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  31. Patient with advanced gastric cancer responds twice to the same systemic therapy. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2009 May; 3(3):115-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  32. Influence of the baseline 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography results on survival and pathologic response in patients with gastroesophageal cancer undergoing chemoradiation. Cancer. 2009 Feb 01; 115(3):624-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  33. Therapy-induced expression of NF-kappaB portends poor prognosis in patients with localized esophageal cancer undergoing preoperative chemoradiation. Dis Esophagus. 2009; 22(2):127-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  34. Influence of induction chemotherapy and class of cytotoxics on pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer. 2008 Sep 15; 113(6):1302-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  35. Lymphovascular invasion as a tool to further subclassify T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2008 Mar 01; 112(5):1020-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  36. Value of endoscopic ultrasound staging in conjunction with the evaluation of lymphovascular invasion in identifying low-risk esophageal carcinoma. Cancer. 2008 Feb 01; 112(3):503-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  37. Clinical stage after preoperative chemoradiation is a better predictor of patient outcome than the baseline stage for localized gastric cancer. Cancer. 2007 Sep 01; 110(5):989-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  38. Association of activated transcription factor nuclear factor kappab with chemoradiation resistance and poor outcome in esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 10; 24(5):748-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  39. Gender-based analysis of esophageal cancer patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation: differences in presentation and therapy outcome. Dis Esophagus. 2006; 19(3):152-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  40. Gene expression profiling of localized esophageal carcinomas: association with pathologic response to preoperative chemoradiation. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 10; 24(2):259-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  41. Value of baseline positron emission tomography for predicting overall survival in patient with nonmetastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. Cancer. 2005 Oct 15; 104(8):1620-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  42. A validated miRNA profile predicts response to therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2014 Dec 01; 120(23):3635-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  43. Clinical staging of patients with early esophageal adenocarcinoma: does FDG-PET/CT have a role? J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Aug; 9(8):1202-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  44. Hippo coactivator YAP1 upregulates SOX9 and endows esophageal cancer cells with stem-like properties. Cancer Res. 2014 Aug 01; 74(15):4170-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  45. Factors associated with local-regional failure after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan; 21(1):306-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  46. Salvage esophagectomy after failed definitive chemoradiation for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Oct; 94(4):1126-32; discussion 1132-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  47. Celiac node failure patterns after definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer in the modern era. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jun 01; 83(2):e231-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  48. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS in differentiating mucosal versus submucosal invasion of superficial esophageal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb; 75(2):242-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  49. Duplicated muscularis mucosae invasion has similar risk of lymph node metastasis and recurrence-free survival as intramucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011 Jul; 35(7):1045-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  50. Prognostic biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma identified by analysis of tumor transcriptome. PLoS One. 2010 Nov 30; 5(11):e15074.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  51. Pathologic T0N1 esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery: an orphan status. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep; 90(3):884-90; discussion 890-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  52. Genome-wide catalogue of chromosomal aberrations in barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a high-density single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010 Sep; 3(9):1176-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  53. Evolving role of self-expanding metal stents in the treatment of malignant dysphagia and fistulas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jan; 65(1):70-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  54. Preoperative chemo-radiation-induced ulceration in patients with esophageal cancer: a confounding factor in tumor response assessment in integrated computed tomographic-positron emission tomographic imaging. J Thorac Oncol. 2006 Jun; 1(5):478-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  55. Endoscopic ultrasonography-identified celiac adenopathy remains a poor prognostic factor despite preoperative chemoradiotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Jan; 131(1):65-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.