Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by MARK WARREN CLEMENS and CHARLES E BUTLER.
Connection Strength

6.542
  1. Breast Implant Informed Consent Should Include the Risk of Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Apr; 137(4):1117-1122.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.551
  2. Bovine versus porcine acellular dermal matrix for complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan; 131(1):71-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  3. Discussion: the lateral chest wall: a separate aesthetic unit in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec; 128(6):635e-636e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.408
  4. Outcomes of Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with a Bovine versus a Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 10 01; 152(4):872-881.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.222
  5. No Differences in Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes among AlloDerm, SurgiMend, and Dermacell for Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 05 01; 151(5):719e-729e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  6. Surgical Outcomes of Implant versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Previous Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 02 01; 151(2):190e-199e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  7. Master's Degrees Among Academic Plastic Surgeons and Plastic Surgery Residents: What Are the Trends? Ann Plast Surg. 2022 11 01; 89(5):478-486.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.217
  8. Does a Latissimus Dorsi Flap Improve Surgical Outcomes of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction following Infected Device Explantation? Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Aug; 10(8):e4409.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.214
  9. Outcomes of Autologous Free Flap Reconstruction Following Infected Device Explantation. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2023 Jun; 39(5):327-333.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.214
  10. Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction following Infected Device Explantation: Is a Second Attempt Worth It? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 08 01; 150(2):247e-259e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  11. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Autologous versus Implant-Based Reconstruction following Infected Breast Device Explantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 06 01; 149(6):1080e-1089e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  12. Breast Implant-associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: A Prospective Series of 52 Patients. Ann Surg. 2022 01 01; 275(1):e245-e249.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  13. Allograft vs Xenograft Bioprosthetic Mesh in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Blinded Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 11 12; 41(12):NP1931-NP1939.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  14. Management of Symptomatic Patients with Textured Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 01; 147(5S):58S-68S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  15. Oncologic Safety and Surveillance of Autologous Fat Grafting following Breast Conservation Therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 08; 146(2):215-225.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  16. Synthetic Mesh Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix for Oncologic Chest Wall Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug; 27(8):3009-3017.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.181
  17. Reconstruction of massive chest wall defects: A 20-year experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Jun; 73(6):1091-1098.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  18. Validation of a CD30 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbant Assay for the Rapid Detection of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Aesthet Surg J. 2020 01 29; 40(2):149-153.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  19. Differences in Human Leukocyte Antigen Expression Between Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Patients and the General Population. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 09 13; 39(10):1065-1070.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  20. Characteristics and Treatment of Advanced Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 03; 143(3S A Review of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma):41S-50S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  21. Breast Reconstruction Following Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 03; 143(3S A Review of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma):51S-58S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  22. US FDA Breast Implant Postapproval Studies: Long-term Outcomes in 99,993 Patients. Ann Surg. 2019 01; 269(1):30-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  23. Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Tissue Expander/Implant Reconstruction: 2-Year Risks and Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Prospective, Multicenter Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov; 140(5):869-877.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  24. U.S. Epidemiology of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May; 139(5):1042-1050.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  25. Global Adverse Event Reports of Breast Implant-Associated ALCL: An International Review of 40 Government Authority Databases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May; 139(5):1029-1039.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  26. Complete Surgical Excision Is Essential for the Management of Patients With Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 10; 34(2):160-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  27. Critical Evaluation of Risk Factors and Early Complications in 564 Consecutive Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions Using Acellular Dermal Matrix at a Single Center. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul; 136(1):10-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  28. Reply: To PMID 24083910. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May; 218(5):1081-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  29. Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Feb; 133(2):223-233.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  30. Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec; 217(6):999-1009.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  31. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of 694 Two-Stage Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 10 01; 152(4S):43S-54S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  32. Ensuring Safety While Achieving Beauty: An Evidence-Based Approach to Optimizing Mastectomy and Autologous Breast Reconstruction Outcomes in Patients with Obesity. J Am Coll Surg. 2023 09 01; 237(3):441-451.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  33. Subpectoral Implant Placement Is Not Protective against Postmastectomy Radiotherapy-Related Complications Compared to Prepectoral Placement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 01 01; 153(1):24-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  34. Self-Reported Risk Factors for Financial Distress and Attitudes Regarding Cost Discussions in Cancer Care: A Single-Institution Cross-Sectional Pilot Study of Breast Reconstruction Recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 04 01; 147(4):587e-595e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  35. Obesity and Breast Reconstruction: Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 03; 145(3):481e-490e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  36. Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction with Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 02 15; 39(3):279-288.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  37. Salvaging the Infected Breast Tissue Expander: A Standardized Multidisciplinary Approach. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jun; 4(6):e732.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.