Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by JESSE CREED SELBER and MARK WARREN CLEMENS.
JESSE CREED SELBER
Connection Strength
4.363
MARK WARREN CLEMENS
  1. Robotic-assisted latissimus dorsi harvest in delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2014 Feb; 28(1):20-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.473
  2. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of 694 Two-Stage Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 10 01; 152(4S):43S-54S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  3. Long-term Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes Comparing Skin-Preserving, Staged Versus Delayed Microvascular Breast Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep; 30(9):5711-5722.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  4. Simultaneous Scalp, Skull, Kidney, and Pancreas Transplant from a Single Donor: Insights from a 5-Year Follow-Up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 06 01; 151(6):1318-1321.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.225
  5. Ensuring Safety While Achieving Beauty: An Evidence-Based Approach to Optimizing Mastectomy and Autologous Breast Reconstruction Outcomes in Patients with Obesity. J Am Coll Surg. 2023 09 01; 237(3):441-451.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  6. Subpectoral Implant Placement Is Not Protective against Postmastectomy Radiotherapy-Related Complications Compared to Prepectoral Placement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 01 01; 153(1):24-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  7. Prospective Pilot Study of Robotic-Assisted Harvest of the Latissimus Dorsi Muscle: A 510(k) Approval Study with U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 06 01; 149(6):1287-1295.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  8. Robotic Harvest of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction: A Case Series. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 05 01; 149(5):1073-1077.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.207
  9. Allograft vs Xenograft Bioprosthetic Mesh in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Blinded Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 11 12; 41(12):NP1931-NP1939.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  10. Comparing Outcomes of Robotically Assisted Latissimus Dorsi Harvest to the Traditional Open Approach in Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 12; 146(6):1221-1225.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
  11. Safety and Efficacy of Smooth Surface Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J. 2020 01 01; 40(1):53-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  12. US FDA Breast Implant Postapproval Studies: Long-term Outcomes in 99,993 Patients. Ann Surg. 2019 01; 269(1):30-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  13. U.S. Epidemiology of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May; 139(5):1042-1050.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  14. Simultaneous Scalp, Skull, Kidney, and Pancreas Transplant from a Single Donor. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jun; 137(6):1851-1861.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  15. Critical Evaluation of Risk Factors and Early Complications in 564 Consecutive Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions Using Acellular Dermal Matrix at a Single Center. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul; 136(1):10-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  16. Autoderm: an alternative bioprosthetic for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May; 131(5):985-987.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  17. A prospective study of transit-time flow volume measurement for intraoperative evaluation and optimization of free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Feb; 131(2):270-281.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  18. Bovine versus porcine acellular dermal matrix for complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan; 131(1):71-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  19. Composite extremity and trunk reconstruction with vascularized fibula flap in postoncologic bone defects: a 10-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan; 129(1):170-178.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  20. Outcomes of Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with a Bovine versus a Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 10 01; 152(4):872-881.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  21. Association between cumulative surgeon experience and long-term outcomes in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Hernia. 2023 06; 27(3):583-592.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  22. No Differences in Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes among AlloDerm, SurgiMend, and Dermacell for Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 05 01; 151(5):719e-729e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  23. Surgical Outcomes of Implant versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Previous Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 02 01; 151(2):190e-199e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  24. Master's Degrees Among Academic Plastic Surgeons and Plastic Surgery Residents: What Are the Trends? Ann Plast Surg. 2022 11 01; 89(5):478-486.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  25. Does a Latissimus Dorsi Flap Improve Surgical Outcomes of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction following Infected Device Explantation? Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Aug; 10(8):e4409.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  26. Outcomes of Autologous Free Flap Reconstruction Following Infected Device Explantation. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2023 Jun; 39(5):327-333.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  27. Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction following Infected Device Explantation: Is a Second Attempt Worth It? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 08 01; 150(2):247e-259e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  28. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Autologous versus Implant-Based Reconstruction following Infected Breast Device Explantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 06 01; 149(6):1080e-1089e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  29. Self-Reported Risk Factors for Financial Distress and Attitudes Regarding Cost Discussions in Cancer Care: A Single-Institution Cross-Sectional Pilot Study of Breast Reconstruction Recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 04 01; 147(4):587e-595e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  30. Synthetic Mesh Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix for Oncologic Chest Wall Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug; 27(8):3009-3017.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  31. Evaluation of Current Perioperative Antimicrobial Regimens for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Breast Implant-based Reconstructive Surgeries. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Jul; 7(7):e2342.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  32. Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction with Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 02 15; 39(3):279-288.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  33. Salvaging the Infected Breast Tissue Expander: A Standardized Multidisciplinary Approach. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jun; 4(6):e732.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  34. Reply: To PMID 24083910. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May; 218(5):1081-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  35. Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec; 217(6):999-1009.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.