Connection

REBECCA MAUREEN HOWELL to Radiotherapy Dosage

This is a "connection" page, showing publications REBECCA MAUREEN HOWELL has written about Radiotherapy Dosage.
Connection Strength

1.766
  1. Experimental validation of deterministic Acuros XB algorithm for IMRT and VMAT dose calculations with the Radiological Physics Center's head and neck phantom. Med Phys. 2012 Apr; 39(4):2193-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.240
  2. Calculation of effective dose from measurements of secondary neutron spectra and scattered photon dose from dynamic MLC IMRT for 6 MV, 15 MV, and 18 MV beam energies. Med Phys. 2006 Feb; 33(2):360-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  3. Development and validation of a 3D-printed bolus cap for total scalp irradiation. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Mar; 20(3):89-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  4. Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System. J Vis Exp. 2018 04 11; (134).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  5. Material matters: Analysis of density uncertainty in 3D printing and its consequences for radiation oncology. Med Phys. 2018 Apr; 45(4):1614-1621.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  6. Treatment Planning System Calculation Errors Are Present in Most Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core-Houston Phantom Failures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 08 01; 98(5):1197-1203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  7. Measured Neutron Spectra and Dose Equivalents From a Mevion Single-Room, Passively Scattered Proton System Used for Craniospinal Irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 01; 95(1):249-257.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  8. Standardized treatment planning methodology for passively scattered proton craniospinal irradiation. Radiat Oncol. 2013 Feb 03; 8:32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  9. Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Dec 07; 55(23):6999-7008.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  10. Methodology for determining doses to in-field, out-of-field and partially in-field organs for late effects studies in photon radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Dec 07; 55(23):7009-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  11. Effect of organ size and position on out-of-field dose distributions during radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Dec 07; 55(23):7025-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  12. Investigation of secondary neutron dose for 18 MV dynamic MLC IMRT delivery. Med Phys. 2005 Mar; 32(3):786-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  13. Measurements of secondary neutron dose from 15 MV and 18 MV IMRT. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005; 115(1-4):508-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  14. Deep learning-based dose prediction to improve the plan quality of volumetric modulated arc therapy for gynecologic cancers. Med Phys. 2023 Nov; 50(11):6639-6648.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  15. Characterizing the interplay of treatment parameters and complexity and their impact on performance on an IROC IMRT phantom using machine learning. Radiother Oncol. 2023 05; 182:109577.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  16. Deep Learning-Based Dose Prediction for Automated, Individualized Quality Assurance of Head and Neck Radiation Therapy Plans. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2023 May-Jun; 13(3):e282-e291.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  17. Automating the treatment planning process for 3D-conformal pediatric craniospinal irradiation therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 03; 70(3):e30164.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  18. Photon beam modeling variations predict errors in IMRT dosimetry audits. Radiother Oncol. 2022 01; 166:8-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  19. Report dose-to-medium in clinical trials where available; a consensus from the Global Harmonisation Group to maximize consistency. Radiother Oncol. 2021 06; 159:106-111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  20. Sensitivity of IROC phantom performance to radiotherapy treatment planning system beam modeling parameters based on community-driven data. Med Phys. 2020 Oct; 47(10):5250-5259.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  21. Dose calculation errors as a component of failing IROC lung and spine phantom irradiations. Med Phys. 2020 Sep; 47(9):4502-4508.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  22. Automatic Verification of Beam Apertures for Cervical Cancer Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020 Sep - Oct; 10(5):e415-e424.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  23. Radiation Dose and Volume to the Pancreas and Subsequent Risk of Diabetes Mellitus: A Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 05 01; 112(5):525-532.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  24. Comparison of Radiation Dose Reconstruction Methods to Investigate Late Adverse Effects of Radiotherapy for Childhood Cancer: A Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Radiat Res. 2020 02; 193(2):95-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  25. Automated treatment planning of postmastectomy radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2019 Sep; 46(9):3767-3775.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  26. Fully Automatic Treatment Planning for External-Beam Radiation Therapy of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Tool for Low-Resource Clinics. J Glob Oncol. 2019 01; 5:1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  27. Treatment plan complexity does not predict IROC Houston anthropomorphic head and neck phantom performance. Phys Med Biol. 2018 10 17; 63(20):205015.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  28. Genome-Wide Association Study to Identify Susceptibility Loci That Modify Radiation-Related Risk for Breast Cancer After Childhood Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 11 01; 109(11).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  29. AAPM TG 158: Measurement and calculation of doses outside the treated volume from external-beam radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2017 Oct; 44(10):e391-e429.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  30. Approaches to reducing photon dose calculation errors near metal implants. Med Phys. 2016 Sep; 43(9):5117.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  31. Out-of-field doses and neutron dose equivalents for electron beams from modern Varian and Elekta linear accelerators. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 07 08; 17(4):442-455.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  32. Comparative Risk Predictions of Second Cancers After Carbon-Ion Therapy Versus Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 01; 95(1):279-286.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  33. Development and implementation of a remote audit tool for high dose rate (HDR) Ir-192 brachytherapy using optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry. Med Phys. 2013 Nov; 40(11):112102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  34. Analytical model for out-of-field dose in photon craniospinal irradiation. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Nov 07; 58(21):7463-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  35. Dosimetric impact of Acuros XB deterministic radiation transport algorithm for heterogeneous dose calculation in lung cancer. Med Phys. 2013 May; 40(5):051710.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  36. Radiation dose to the esophagus from breast cancer radiation therapy, 1943-1996: an international population-based study of 414 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jul 15; 86(4):694-701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  37. Risk of radiogenic second cancers following volumetric modulated arc therapy and proton arc therapy for prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2012 Nov 07; 57(21):7117-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  38. The clinical impact of the couch top and rails on IMRT and arc therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2011 Dec 07; 56(23):7435-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  39. Risk of second malignant neoplasm following proton versus intensity-modulated photon radiotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Dec 07; 55(23):7055-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  40. Neutron spectra and dose equivalents calculated in tissue for high-energy radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2009 Apr; 36(4):1244-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  41. Energy spectra, sources, and shielding considerations for neutrons generated by a flattening filter-free Clinac. Med Phys. 2008 May; 35(5):1906-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.