Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by JEFFREY H LEE and MANOOP BHUTANI.
JEFFREY H LEE
Connection Strength
2.191
MANOOP BHUTANI
  1. Pretest prediction and diagnosis of metastatic lesions to the pancreas by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Oct; 30(10):1552-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  2. Differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from other neoplastic solid pancreatic lesions: a tertiary oncology center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Feb; 81(2):370-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  3. Repeat endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions at a tertiary referral center will alter the initial inconclusive result. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2013 Jun; 22(2):183-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  4. Clinical decision making in the management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May; 7(4):353-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  5. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in evaluation of metastatic lesions to the pancreas: a tertiary cancer center experience. Pancreas. 2013 Apr; 42(3):516-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  6. Use of EUS-FNA in diagnosing pancreatic neoplasm without a definitive mass on CT. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jul; 78(1):73-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  7. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS in differentiating mucosal versus submucosal invasion of superficial esophageal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb; 75(2):242-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  8. Gastric and pancreatic metastases from pleomorphic lung carcinoma. Endoscopy. 2011; 43 Suppl 2 UCTN:E317-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  9. EUS-FNA for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a tertiary cancer center experience. Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Mar; 57(3):791-800.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  10. Endoscopic management of duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis--a single-center experience. Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Mar; 57(3):732-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  11. Is endoscopic ultrasound "sound" for pancreatic cancer screening? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct; 43(9):797-802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  12. Endoscopic esophageal tumor length: a prognostic factor for patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer. 2011 Jan 01; 117(1):63-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  13. Prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma patients with various burdens of peritoneal metastases. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan; 113(1):29-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  14. Geographic distribution of regional metastatic nodes affects the outcome of trimodality-eligible patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Oncology. 2015; 88(6):332-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  15. Importance of surveillance and success of salvage strategies after definitive chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 20; 32(30):3400-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  16. A validated miRNA profile predicts response to therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2014 Dec 01; 120(23):3635-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  17. Post-chemoradiation surgical pathology stage can customize the surveillance strategy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Aug; 12(8):1139-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  18. Distribution and timing of distant metastasis after local therapy in a large cohort of patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer. Oncology. 2014; 86(5-6):336-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  19. Factors associated with local-regional failure after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan; 21(1):306-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  20. ALDH-1 expression levels predict response or resistance to preoperative chemoradiation in resectable esophageal cancer patients. Mol Oncol. 2014 Feb; 8(1):142-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  21. Locoregional failure rate after preoperative chemoradiation of esophageal adenocarcinoma and the outcomes of salvage strategies. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 01; 31(34):4306-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  22. Incidence of brain metastases after trimodality therapy in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer: implications for screening and surveillance. Oncology. 2013; 85(4):204-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  23. Results of the baseline positron emission tomography can customize therapy of localized esophageal adenocarcinoma patients who achieve a clinical complete response after chemoradiation. Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov; 24(11):2854-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  24. A phase II randomized trial of induction chemotherapy versus no induction chemotherapy followed by preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov; 24(11):2844-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  25. Propensity-based matching between esophagogastric cancer patients who had surgery and who declined surgery after preoperative chemoradiation. Oncology. 2013; 85(2):95-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  26. Feasibility study of EUS-NOTES as a novel approach for pancreatic cancer staging and therapy: an international collaborative study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Jan-Feb; 60(121):180-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  27. Association between clinical complete response and pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with gastroesophageal cancer: analysis in a large cohort. Ann Oncol. 2013 May; 24(5):1262-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  28. Outcome of trimodality-eligible esophagogastric cancer patients who declined surgery after preoperative chemoradiation. Oncology. 2012; 83(5):300-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  29. A nomogram associated with high probability of malignant nodes in the surgical specimen after trimodality therapy of patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Dec; 48(18):3396-404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  30. Clinical parameters model for predicting pathologic complete response following preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct; 23(10):2638-2642.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  31. Localized gastric cancer treated with chemoradation without surgery: UTMD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Oncology. 2012; 82(6):347-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  32. Celiac node failure patterns after definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer in the modern era. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jun 01; 83(2):e231-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  33. Nomograms for prognostication of outcome in patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal carcinoma undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy. Oncology. 2012; 82(2):108-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  34. Patients with high body mass index tend to have lower stage of esophageal carcinoma at diagnosis. Dis Esophagus. 2012 Sep-Oct; 25(7):614-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  35. Duplicated muscularis mucosae invasion has similar risk of lymph node metastasis and recurrence-free survival as intramucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011 Jul; 35(7):1045-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  36. Update: modern approaches to the treatment of localized esophageal cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2011 Jun; 13(3):157-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  37. Prognostic significance of baseline positron emission tomography and importance of clinical complete response in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Cancer. 2011 Nov 01; 117(21):4823-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  38. Prognostic biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma identified by analysis of tumor transcriptome. PLoS One. 2010 Nov 30; 5(11):e15074.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  39. The influence of high body mass index on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer after surgery as primary therapy. Cancer. 2010 Dec 15; 116(24):5619-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  40. Combined modality therapy of cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer: the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2011 Mar 01; 117(5):925-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  41. Critical role of surgery in patients with gastroesophageal carcinoma with a poor prognosis after chemoradiation as defined by positron emission tomography. Cancer. 2010 Oct 01; 116(19):4487-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  42. The standardized uptake value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after chemoradiation and clinical outcome in patients with localized gastroesophageal carcinoma. Oncology. 2010; 78(5-6):316-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  43. Genome-wide catalogue of chromosomal aberrations in barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a high-density single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010 Sep; 3(9):1176-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  44. Multimodality approaches to localized gastric cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Apr; 8(4):417-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  45. The higher the decrease in the standardized uptake value of positron emission tomography after chemoradiation, the better the survival of patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2009 Nov 15; 115(22):5184-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  46. Influence of the baseline 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography results on survival and pathologic response in patients with gastroesophageal cancer undergoing chemoradiation. Cancer. 2009 Feb 01; 115(3):624-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  47. Therapy-induced expression of NF-kappaB portends poor prognosis in patients with localized esophageal cancer undergoing preoperative chemoradiation. Dis Esophagus. 2009; 22(2):127-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  48. Influence of induction chemotherapy and class of cytotoxics on pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer. 2008 Sep 15; 113(6):1302-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.