Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by XIAODONG ZHANG and MICHAEL GILLIN.
Connection Strength
1.141
-
Selective robust optimization: A new intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization strategy. Med Phys. 2015 Aug; 42(8):4840-7.
Score: 0.132
-
Clinical implementation of intensity modulated proton therapy for thoracic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 15; 90(4):809-18.
Score: 0.125
-
Evaluation and mitigation of the interplay effects of intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancer in a clinical setting. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Nov-Dec; 4(6):e259-68.
Score: 0.124
-
On the interplay effects with proton scanning beams in stage III lung cancer. Med Phys. 2014 Feb; 41(2):021721.
Score: 0.119
-
Improving spot-scanning proton therapy patient specific quality assurance with HPlusQA, a second-check dose calculation engine. Med Phys. 2013 Dec; 40(12):121708.
Score: 0.118
-
Parameterization of multiple Bragg curves for scanning proton beams using simultaneous fitting of multiple curves. Phys Med Biol. 2011 Dec 21; 56(24):7725-35.
Score: 0.102
-
Intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning using single-field optimization: the impact of monitor unit constraints on plan quality. Med Phys. 2010 Mar; 37(3):1210-9.
Score: 0.091
-
Effect of anatomic motion on proton therapy dose distributions in prostate cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Feb 01; 67(2):620-9.
Score: 0.073
-
Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2015 Mar; 114(3):367-72.
Score: 0.032
-
A single-field integrated boost treatment planning technique for spot scanning proton therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2014 Sep 11; 9:202.
Score: 0.031
-
Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15; 89(4):846-53.
Score: 0.030
-
Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system. Med Phys. 2013 Apr; 40(4):041723.
Score: 0.028
-
Use of treatment log files in spot scanning proton therapy as part of patient-specific quality assurance. Med Phys. 2013 Feb; 40(2):021703.
Score: 0.028
-
Dynamically accumulated dose and 4D accumulated dose for moving tumors. Med Phys. 2012 Dec; 39(12):7359-67.
Score: 0.028
-
External-beam accelerated partial breast irradiation using multiple proton beam configurations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Aug 01; 80(5):1464-72.
Score: 0.023
-
Incorporating partial shining effects in proton pencil-beam dose calculation. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Feb 07; 53(3):605-16.
Score: 0.020
-
Proton radiotherapy for liver tumors: dosimetric advantages over photon plans. Med Dosim. 2008; 33(4):259-67.
Score: 0.020
-
Effectiveness of noncoplanar IMRT planning using a parallelized multiresolution beam angle optimization method for paranasal sinus carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Oct 01; 63(2):594-601.
Score: 0.017