Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by XIAODONG ZHANG and RADHE MOHAN.
Connection Strength
2.191
-
Effect of anatomic motion on proton therapy dose distributions in prostate cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Feb 01; 67(2):620-9.
Score: 0.294
-
A sensitivity-guided algorithm for automated determination of IMRT objective function parameters. Med Phys. 2006 Aug; 33(8):2935-44.
Score: 0.284
-
Speed and convergence properties of gradient algorithms for optimization of IMRT. Med Phys. 2004 May; 31(5):1141-52.
Score: 0.243
-
Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer. Med Phys. 2013 Aug; 40(8):081709.
Score: 0.115
-
Automated volumetric modulated Arc therapy treatment planning for stage III lung cancer: how does it compare with intensity-modulated radio therapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Sep 01; 84(1):e69-76.
Score: 0.108
-
Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy. Med Phys. 2012 Feb; 39(2):1079-91.
Score: 0.104
-
Parameterization of multiple Bragg curves for scanning proton beams using simultaneous fitting of multiple curves. Phys Med Biol. 2011 Dec 21; 56(24):7725-35.
Score: 0.102
-
An efficient dose calculation strategy for intensity modulated proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2011 Feb 21; 56(4):N71-84.
Score: 0.097
-
Intensity-modulated proton therapy reduces the dose to normal tissue compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy or passive scattering proton therapy and enables individualized radical radiotherapy for extensive stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: a virtual clinical study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jun 01; 77(2):357-66.
Score: 0.087
-
Four-dimensional computed tomography-based treatment planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy for distal esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Sep 01; 72(1):278-87.
Score: 0.082
-
Incorporating partial shining effects in proton pencil-beam dose calculation. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Feb 07; 53(3):605-16.
Score: 0.078
-
Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm. Phys Med Biol. 2007 Aug 07; 52(15):4569-84.
Score: 0.076
-
A novel patch-field design using an optimized grid filter for passively scattered proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jun 21; 52(12):N265-75.
Score: 0.075
-
Beam angle optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of non-small-cell lung cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jun 01; 65(2):561-72.
Score: 0.070
-
Effectiveness of noncoplanar IMRT planning using a parallelized multiresolution beam angle optimization method for paranasal sinus carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Oct 01; 63(2):594-601.
Score: 0.067
-
Use of deformed intensity distributions for on-line modification of image-guided IMRT to account for interfractional anatomic changes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Mar 15; 61(4):1258-66.
Score: 0.064
-
Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Nov 15; 60(4):1325-37.
Score: 0.063
-
Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2015 Mar; 114(3):367-72.
Score: 0.032
-
Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15; 89(4):846-53.
Score: 0.030
-
Proton stereotactic body radiation therapy for clinically challenging cases of centrally and superiorly located stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jul 15; 80(4):1015-22.
Score: 0.023
-
Impact of using different four-dimensional computed tomography data sets to design proton treatment plans for distal esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Feb 01; 73(2):601-9.
Score: 0.021
-
Effects of interfractional motion and anatomic changes on proton therapy dose distribution in lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Dec 01; 72(5):1385-95.
Score: 0.020
-
Proton radiotherapy for liver tumors: dosimetric advantages over photon plans. Med Dosim. 2008; 33(4):259-67.
Score: 0.020
-
4D Proton treatment planning strategy for mobile lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 01; 67(3):906-14.
Score: 0.018
-
Significant reduction of normal tissue dose by proton radiotherapy compared with three-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy in Stage I or Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 15; 65(4):1087-96.
Score: 0.017