Connection

ELIZABETH SHPALL to Neoplasms

This is a "connection" page, showing publications ELIZABETH SHPALL has written about Neoplasms.
Connection Strength

0.638
  1. Engineering Natural Killer Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy. Mol Ther. 2017 08 02; 25(8):1769-1781.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  2. Dendritic cell immunotherapy for the treatment of neoplastic disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006 Feb; 12(2):113-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  3. Stem-cell transplantation for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2004 Nov; 26(1-2):31-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  4. Safety, efficacy and determinants of response of allogeneic CD19-specific CAR-NK cells in CD19+ B cell tumors: a phase 1/2 trial. Nat Med. 2024 Mar; 30(3):772-784.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  5. Feasibility and Safety of Personalized, Multi-Target, Adoptive Cell Therapy (IMA101): First-in-Human Clinical Trial in Patients with Advanced Metastatic Cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2023 07 05; 11(7):925-945.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  6. Diet-derived metabolites and mucus link the gut microbiome to fever after cytotoxic cancer treatment. Sci Transl Med. 2022 11 16; 14(671):eabo3445.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  7. Sleeping beauty generated CD19 CAR T-Cell therapy for advanced B-Cell hematological malignancies. Front Immunol. 2022; 13:1032397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  8. The Unique Symptom Burden of Patients Receiving CAR T-Cell Therapy. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2021 12; 37(6):151216.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  9. Diagnosis, grading and management of toxicities from immunotherapies in children, adolescents and young adults with cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 07; 18(7):435-453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  10. Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy: How Are We Driving in Solid Tumors? Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 10; 26(10):1759-1769.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  11. Autologous stem-cell transplantation for solid tumors in adults. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1999 Oct; 13(5):939-68, vi.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  12. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 09; 16(9):1092-1106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  13. Ex vivo expansion of megakaryocyte progenitors: effect of various growth factor combinations on CD34+ progenitor cells from bone marrow and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood. Exp Hematol. 1997 Oct; 25(11):1125-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  14. Impact of the timing of hepatitis B virus identification and anti-hepatitis B virus therapy initiation on the risk of adverse liver outcomes for patients receiving cancer therapy. Cancer. 2017 Sep 01; 123(17):3367-3376.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  15. Peripheral blood stem cells for autografting. Annu Rev Med. 1997; 48:241-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  16. Hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index predicts inpatient mortality and survival in patients who received allogeneic transplantation admitted to the intensive care unit. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 20; 31(33):4207-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  17. Role of autotransplantation in treatment of other solid tumors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1993 Jun; 7(3):663-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  18. Chimeric antibody receptors (CARs): driving T-cell specificity to enhance anti-tumor immunity. Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2012 01 01; 4(2):520-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  19. Redirecting specificity of T-cell populations for CD19 using the Sleeping Beauty system. Cancer Res. 2008 Apr 15; 68(8):2961-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  20. Update on understanding the causes of cancer. Compr Ther. 1986 Aug; 12(8):9-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  21. Prognostic analysis of pre-transplant peripheral T-cell levels in patients receiving an autologous hematopoietic progenitor-cell transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005 Sep; 36(5):425-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  22. Nonpredictable pharmacokinetic behavior of high-dose cyclophosphamide in combination with cisplatin and 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea. Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Apr; 5(4):747-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  23. Peripheral blood stem cell harvesting and CD34-positive cell selection. Cancer Treat Res. 1997; 77:143-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  24. Brincidofovir (CMX-001) for refractory and resistant CMV and HSV infections in immunocompromised cancer patients: A single-center experience. Antiviral Res. 2016 10; 134:58-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  25. Challenges in Determining Genotypes for Pharmacogenetics in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients. J Mol Diagn. 2016 09; 18(5):638-642.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  26. A phase I/II study of high-dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and thioTEPA followed by autologous bone marrow and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed peripheral-blood progenitor cells in patients with advanced malignancies. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1996; 37(6):561-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  27. High-dose combination cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and melphalan with autologous bone marrow support. A clinical and pharmacologic study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1989; 23(6):377-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  28. Extracorporeal photopheresis for acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease: does it work? Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006 Jan; 12(1 Suppl 2):37-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  29. Acute encephalopathy: a new toxicity associated with high-dose paclitaxel. Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Mar; 5(3):501-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  30. Safeguarding the administration of high-dose chemotherapy: a national practice survey by the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 1997 Dec; 3(6):331-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.