Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by DAVID ROSENTHAL and JAN S LEWIN.
DAVID ROSENTHAL
Connection Strength
2.114
JAN S LEWIN
  1. Outcomes after radiation therapy for T2N0/stage II glottic squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2020 10; 42(10):2791-2800.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  2. Outcomes of carotid-sparing IMRT for T1 glottic cancer: Comparison with conventional radiation. Laryngoscope. 2020 01; 130(1):146-153.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  3. Three-dimensional imaging assessment of anatomic invasion and volumetric considerations for chemo/radiotherapy-based laryngeal preservation in T3 larynx cancer. Oral Oncol. 2018 04; 79:1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  4. Delayed lower cranial neuropathy after oropharyngeal intensity-modulated radiotherapy: A cohort analysis and literature review. Head Neck. 2017 08; 39(8):1516-1523.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  5. Long-term outcomes after multidisciplinary management of T3 laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas: Improved functional outcomes and survival with modern therapeutic approaches. Head Neck. 2016 12; 38(12):1739-1751.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  6. Long-term outcomes after surgical or nonsurgical initial therapy for patients with T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx: A 3-decade survey. Cancer. 2015 May 15; 121(10):1608-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  7. Lymphedema outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb; 152(2):284-291.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  8. Candidate dosimetric predictors of long-term swallowing dysfunction after oropharyngeal intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Dec 01; 78(5):1356-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  9. Simple carotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique and preliminary experience for T1-2 glottic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jun 01; 77(2):455-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  10. The M. D. Anderson symptom inventory-head and neck module, a patient-reported outcome instrument, accurately predicts the severity of radiation-induced mucositis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Dec 01; 72(5):1355-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  11. Swallowing outcomes after radiotherapy for laryngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Feb; 134(2):178-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  12. Measuring head and neck cancer symptom burden: the development and validation of the M. D. Anderson symptom inventory, head and neck module. Head Neck. 2007 Oct; 29(10):923-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  13. Prevention and treatment of dysphagia and aspiration after chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 10; 24(17):2636-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  14. Prospective longitudinal patient-reported outcomes of swallowing following intensity modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2020 07; 148:133-139.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  15. Neurologic sequelae following radiation with and without chemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: Patient reported outcomes study. Head Neck. 2020 08; 42(8):2137-2144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  16. Single-item discrimination of quality-of-life-altering dysphagia among 714 long-term oropharyngeal cancer survivors: Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures of swallowing. Cancer. 2019 05 15; 125(10):1654-1664.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  17. Symptom Burden Associated With Late Lower Cranial Neuropathy in Long-term Oropharyngeal Cancer Survivors. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 11 01; 144(11):1066-1076.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  18. Modeling symptom drivers of oral intake in long-term head and neck cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Apr; 27(4):1405-1415.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  19. Radiotherapy dose-volume parameters predict videofluoroscopy-detected dysphagia per DIGEST after IMRT for oropharyngeal cancer: Results of a prospective registry. Radiother Oncol. 2018 09; 128(3):442-451.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  20. Quantitative pretreatment CT volumetry: Association with oncologic outcomes in patients with T4a squamous carcinoma of the larynx. Head Neck. 2017 08; 39(8):1609-1620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  21. Predicting two-year longitudinal MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory outcomes after intensity modulated radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2017 04; 127(4):842-848.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  22. Long-Term, Prospective Performance of the MD?Anderson Dysphagia Inventory in "Low-Intermediate Risk" Oropharyngeal Carcinoma After Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 03 15; 97(4):700-708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  23. Magnetic resonance imaging of swallowing-related structures in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving IMRT: Longitudinal dose-response characterization of quantitative signal kinetics. Radiother Oncol. 2016 Feb; 118(2):315-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  24. Late radiation-associated dysphagia (late-RAD) with lower cranial neuropathy after oropharyngeal radiotherapy: a preliminary dosimetric comparison. Oral Oncol. 2014 Aug; 50(8):746-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  25. Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15; 89(4):846-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  26. Compliance with quality assurance measures in patients treated for early oral tongue cancer. Cancer. 2010 Jul 15; 116(14):3408-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  27. The role of salvage surgery in patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Cancer. 2009 Dec 15; 115(24):5723-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.