Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by LAURENCE EDWARD COURT and TINA MARIE BRIERE.
Connection Strength
1.137
-
Automation of radiation treatment planning for rectal cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13712.
Score: 0.213
-
A Novel Methodology using CT Imaging Biomarkers to Quantify Radiation Sensitivity in the Esophagus with Application to Clinical Trials. Sci Rep. 2017 07 20; 7(1):6034.
Score: 0.151
-
Differences in Normal Tissue Response in the Esophagus Between Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using In?Vivo Imaging Biomarkers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 11 15; 99(4):1013-1020.
Score: 0.150
-
(18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Can Quantify and Predict Esophageal Injury During Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 11 01; 96(3):670-8.
Score: 0.141
-
Objectively Quantifying Radiation Esophagitis With Novel Computed Tomography-Based Metrics. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Feb 01; 94(2):385-93.
Score: 0.133
-
Automatic end-to-end VMAT treatment planning for rectal cancers. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Apr; 25(4):e14259.
Score: 0.059
-
Automated field-in-field whole brain radiotherapy planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Feb; 24(2):e13819.
Score: 0.054
-
Automated Brain Metastases Segmentation With a Deep Dive Into False-positive Detection. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023 Jan-Feb; 8(1):101085.
Score: 0.054
-
Clinical implementation of automated treatment planning for whole-brain radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Sep; 22(9):94-102.
Score: 0.050
-
Our Experience Leading a Large Medical Physics Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jul-Aug; 6(4):100683.
Score: 0.049
-
Erratum: "The utility of quantitative CT radiomics features for improved prediction of radiation pneumonitis" [Med. Phys. Vol. 45(11):5317-5324 (2018)]. Med Phys. 2019 Feb; 46(2):1079.
Score: 0.042
-
The utility of quantitative CT radiomics features for improved prediction of radiation pneumonitis. Med Phys. 2018 Nov; 45(11):5317-5324.
Score: 0.041