Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by STEVEN JAY FRANK and XIAORONG RONALD ZHU.
Connection Strength

3.089
  1. Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15; 89(4):846-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.480
  2. A Novel Polymer-Encapsulated Multi-Imaging Modality Fiducial Marker with Positive Signal Contrast for Image-Guided Radiation Therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 31; 16(3).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.235
  3. Intensity modulated proton arc therapy via geometry-based energy selection for ependymoma. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Jul; 24(7):e13954.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  4. Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A 12-Year, Single-Institution Experience. Int J Part Ther. 2021; 8(1):108-118.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  5. Patterns of protein expression in human head and neck cancer cell lines differ after proton vs photon radiotherapy. Head Neck. 2020 02; 42(2):289-301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  6. Proton versus photon radiation-induced cell death in head and neck cancer cells. Head Neck. 2019 01; 41(1):46-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  7. Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Adaptive Planning for Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer. Int J Part Ther. 2017; 4(2):26-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  8. Synchrotron-Based Pencil Beam Scanning Nozzle with an Integrated Mini-Ridge Filter: A Dosimetric Study to Optimize Treatment Delivery. Cancers (Basel). 2017 Dec 13; 9(12).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  9. Human papillomavirus status and the relative biological effectiveness of proton radiotherapy in head and neck cancer cells. Head Neck. 2017 04; 39(4):708-715.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  10. Clinical Outcomes and Patterns of Disease Recurrence After Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 01; 95(1):360-367.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  11. A Multidisciplinary Orbit-Sparing Treatment Approach That Includes Proton Therapy for Epithelial Tumors of the Orbit and Ocular Adnexa. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 01; 95(1):344-352.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  12. Towards effective and efficient patient-specific quality assurance for spot scanning proton therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2015 Apr 10; 7(2):631-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  13. Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2015 Mar; 114(3):367-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  14. A single-field integrated boost treatment planning technique for spot scanning proton therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2014 Sep 11; 9:202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  15. Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: a treatment planning comparison. Med Dosim. 2013; 38(4):390-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  16. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers. Med Phys. 2013 May; 40(5):051711.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  17. A novel dose-based positioning method for CT image-guided proton therapy. Med Phys. 2013 May; 40(5):051714.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  18. Adaptation and dosimetric commissioning of a synchrotron-based proton beamline for FLASH experiments. Phys Med Biol. 2022 08 05; 67(16).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  19. Transitioning from measurement-based to combined patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Br J Radiol. 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  20. Quantifying the accuracy of deformable image registration for cone-beam computed tomography with a physical phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Oct; 20(10):92-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  21. Characterization of a new physical phantom for testing rigid and deformable image registration. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jan; 20(1):145-153.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  22. Proton therapy for seminoma: Case report describing the technique, efficacy, and advantages of proton-based therapy for seminoma. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 Mar-Apr; 5(2):135-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  23. Quality of life and toxicity from passively scattered and spot-scanning proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Dec 01; 87(5):946-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  24. Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer. Med Phys. 2013 Aug; 40(8):081709.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  25. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization. Med Phys. 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.