Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by STEVEN JAY FRANK and NARAYAN SAHOO.
Connection Strength
1.955
-
A Novel Polymer-Encapsulated Multi-Imaging Modality Fiducial Marker with Positive Signal Contrast for Image-Guided Radiation Therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 31; 16(3).
Score: 0.243
-
Intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer reduces rates of late xerostomia. Radiother Oncol. 2021 07; 160:32-39.
Score: 0.200
-
Proton and photon radiosensitization effects of niraparib, a PARP-1/-2 inhibitor, on human head and neck cancer cells. Head Neck. 2020 09; 42(9):2244-2256.
Score: 0.187
-
Patterns of protein expression in human head and neck cancer cell lines differ after proton vs photon radiotherapy. Head Neck. 2020 02; 42(2):289-301.
Score: 0.181
-
Proton versus photon radiation-induced cell death in head and neck cancer cells. Head Neck. 2019 01; 41(1):46-55.
Score: 0.170
-
Human papillomavirus status and the relative biological effectiveness of proton radiotherapy in head and neck cancer cells. Head Neck. 2017 04; 39(4):708-715.
Score: 0.149
-
Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15; 89(4):846-53.
Score: 0.124
-
Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: a treatment planning comparison. Med Dosim. 2013; 38(4):390-4.
Score: 0.117
-
Intensity modulated proton arc therapy via geometry-based energy selection for ependymoma. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Jul; 24(7):e13954.
Score: 0.057
-
Adaptation and dosimetric commissioning of a synchrotron-based proton beamline for FLASH experiments. Phys Med Biol. 2022 08 05; 67(16).
Score: 0.055
-
Predictive performance of different NTCP techniques for radiation-induced esophagitis in NSCLC patients receiving proton radiotherapy. Sci Rep. 2022 06 02; 12(1):9178.
Score: 0.054
-
Lyman-Kutcher-Burman normal tissue complication probability modeling for radiation-induced esophagitis in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving proton radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2020 05; 146:200-204.
Score: 0.047
-
Evaluation of the high definition field of view option of a large-bore computed tomography scanner for radiation therapy simulation. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan; 13:44-49.
Score: 0.046
-
Transitioning from measurement-based to combined patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Br J Radiol. 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190669.
Score: 0.046
-
Synchrotron-Based Pencil Beam Scanning Nozzle with an Integrated Mini-Ridge Filter: A Dosimetric Study to Optimize Treatment Delivery. Cancers (Basel). 2017 Dec 13; 9(12).
Score: 0.040
-
Robust Optimization for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans with Multi-Isocenter Large Fields. Int J Part Ther. 2016; 3(2):305-311.
Score: 0.037
-
Proton Beam Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Quality-of-Life Trial. Int J Part Ther. 2016; 3(1):27-36.
Score: 0.036
-
Novel Hybrid Scattering- and Scanning-Beam Proton Therapy Approach. Int J Part Ther. 2016; 3(1):37-50.
Score: 0.036
-
Quantitative analysis of treatment process time and throughput capacity for spot scanning proton therapy. Med Phys. 2016 Jul; 43(7):3975.
Score: 0.036
-
Towards effective and efficient patient-specific quality assurance for spot scanning proton therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2015 Apr 10; 7(2):631-47.
Score: 0.033
-
A single-field integrated boost treatment planning technique for spot scanning proton therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2014 Sep 11; 9:202.
Score: 0.032
-
Quality of life and toxicity from passively scattered and spot-scanning proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Dec 01; 87(5):946-53.
Score: 0.030